Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
blake kathryn
⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
ellievsbear
Product Placement
art blog(derogatory)
Monterey Bay Aquarium
if i look back, i am lost
NASA
â
đ
Keni
noise dept.
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
h
official daine visual archive
romaâ
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
@thelastmotel
I HAVE TO RANT ABOUT THIS ALRIGHT.
I Saw a reel the premise was whenever hinduism was in trouble someone or the other saved it. The list was chandragupta, Shankaracharya, Chattrapathi Shivaji Maharaj and then NARENDRA MODI. SIR IN WHAT WORLD HAS NARENDRA MODI CONTRIBUTED MORE TO HINDUISM THAN SHANKARA AND Shivaji, ONE MAN WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE CREATION OF MODERN DAY HINDUISM AND THEN THE MAN WHO BUILT THE MARATHA EMPIRE, HES A Politician NOTHING MIRE NOTHING LESS, ANDHBHAKTS PISS ME OFf
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Anyone ever feel guilty about promising Mr Krishna something and failing, for context he was supposed to get mango Payasam and poori, I couldn't make it and now I'm crying about not giving it to him
Sorry Da
I am sitting here wondering alright, let's see if this is controversial.
How does Krishna deal with so much constant love and admiration. Doesn't it gets difficult for him, whoever u are doesn't it gets difficult to process so much love and care, just how.
Annamayya has no right being this cute, ANGAJUNNIGANNA MAYANNA IRU RA RA is such a cute statement. Father of cupid, my son, come here there's milk in a gold bowl for u.
Idk why I'm putting this here someone has to know
Go chalant or go home bish.
be non
be chalant
and hence
be non chalant
thank u for coming to my ted talk
ahhn Hi Non I'm Chalant
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I absolutely hate how much traction the entire tulabhram story gets. like it's not even from any text, it's a folk tale. a folk tale which doesn't enhance the og text, but just pits two characters against one another. satyabhama being materialistic doesn't even make any sense, she is BHUDEVI. shouldn't she be, idk, grounded? i personally see rukmini as more of a jewelry girl but that's just my own opinion-
what i mean to say is, the story is practically rukmini vs satyabhama. oh look how haughty and arrogant satyabhama is, she is so materialistic, of course rukmini's love won against that. boy, they are equally important. they are literally THE SAME PERSON? both of them are forms of lakshmi only. shridevi and bhudevi, two aspects of the same goddess. that story is just full on satyabhama slander, and this is coming from someone who is a huge rukmini lover. can we just stop paying attention to that story and pitting these two baddies against eo?
EXACTLY
And they use that singular story as basis for entirety of satyabhamas character. THE WOMAN WAS A WARRIOR.
WHO KILLED AN ASURA FAMED FOR HIS STRENGTH AND PROWESS. SHE IS THE OG WARRIOR QUEEN (one of atleast) PEOPLE. Secondly the tulabharam tale as such is the stuff of folklore so essentially could be a way to try to convey don't get overly materialistic, where they would have found Satyabhama a convenient instrument. Even then, it makes exactly zero sense to slander her to praise rukmini, who mind you has her own set of unique virtues that make her GOATED AF. And dude they are two sides of the same coin, so the materialism argument loses its validity then and there. Because like even in an allegorical sense, they can be used to represent love for God by perceiving him beyond the materialistic world, renunciation that is, and by perceiving him as imbued in everything around us, hence through a certain worldly indulgence (for the lack of a better word) where we love everything as if it was God itself. Both of these are equally valid and prevalent. So pitting one against the other is equivalent to slamming down another's mode of Bhakti in favour of uplifting ur own.
Secondly dude. U have one outspoken baddie and u have one silent killer baddie. Both of them are baddies, nonetheless, with different personalities and habits for god's sake (when did that become a problem). As long as they weren't actively malicious or canonically problematic, u have no grounds to slander either of them.
And yes rukmini does give off jewelery gurl vibes. After all she's the youngest of six and the only girl in the family. It's a given, considering she's our pretty and badass pwincess turned pretty and badass queen.
don't ask a man his height, a woman her age, and a 12th grader "so what plans next?"
And if I'm meant to be alone, please take away my desire to be loved.
k.b. // unknown
me everyday. Oh to feel too much
Everything I was afraid of losing, I always lost.
i hate when apps know that iâm screenshotting something. when i screenshot something, thatâs me acting outside your realm of understanding, app. i am beyond what you consider the observable universe. youâre not supposed to perceive me. we donât know when god screenshots the earth. we donât know when heâs like, âokay iâm just gonna take a pic in case i ever want to add dinosaurs back to something later and donât remember how.â and if we did, we wouldnât act all smug about it like, âhey, you wanna share that post? you could just click here to share it.â no, man. you didnât catch me. i screenshotted this for my own reasons. whatâs next? i canât take a photo of my computer screen with my phone out of laziness without being shamed by the printer i donât own?
with How old God is, I have a feeling him trying to take that screenshot ended up clicking the power button and the dinosaurs went off. Why am I posting this here God only knows
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Only Hindus try to show how "scientific" their customs are . They try to show the scientific reasoning behind each ritual .
Literally no one from any other religion does that . Why are we doing it ?
Just say gand marao . This is what the ritual is , my ancestors told me to do this hence I'm doing .
Its simple, the people they are justifying it to aren't outsiders, or rather not just outsiders is it. Its part of a larger struggle to take Hinduism to the younger generations , other religion doesn't do it because they don't have the problem of youth leaving.
Not to the extent hinduism does
I need yall to understand something.
Asuras. And Devas. Are the same. They're the SAME class of celestial beings. Only difference is that they don't have the same mother, one of them have a bad reputation and the other.... Got the amrit.
Treating Asuras like Rakshasas is very misdirected. They are NOT synonymous at all. Rakshasas are NOT celestial. They are terrestrial. Asuras ARE celestial, their half-siblings being the Devas.
ALSO, GUYS ASURA DOESNT MEAN EVIL, PRAHLADA CASE IN POINT ASURS OS JUST A-SURA , as in Devas and not devas (Suras being devas), they were enemies of equal calibre, Rakshasas are sort of zombies cannon fodder kind of people.
Istg Krishna has some beef against headwear
I have an idol of Ladoo gopal(baby Krishna in case you didn't know) at my home,and we dress him up in different clothes every month.
Almost everytime I come back home and see the idol,the crown or turban we had made him wear had fallen off.
The headwear we buy fits perfectly on his head in a way that doesn't seem like it can fall off,but every single day,it doesđ
Baby Krishna hates any sort of headwear.
cant blame him, It does get heavy, besides it hides his gorgeous hair
It hurts
Khushi toh aakar tata bye bye bolkar vaise ke vaise chal gayi. Hamare toh aise problem hi nahi
last Khushi I saw was my classmate
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Rama (रञऎ) during his exile
In the Ramayana,Rama is described as having a more toned physique,so i imagine that the features of his face would be softer in contrast to that.
The eye design is actually inspired by Kathakali makeup,lol
His hair is very matted during his time in exile.
He also had a beard btw
seeing a group of people thinking they are being the first ones to think of this grand idea of seeing kali/hindu goddesses as the divine supreme. they feel that theyve done such a progressive thing, how it's an achievement. like they feel that she is a shamed and vilified goddess and how they are the first one to get this oh so great epiphany that yes, she too, is worth worshipping.
girl, there is a certain region of this country which has been doing this for centuries, till the point that devi being the supreme has been engrained into the very culture, the festivals of this region. i'm talking about east india, ofc. yes, while ppl do associate shaktism with bengal, it is equally prominent in mithila and assam.
like...im not saying only WE do this. others also do. im saying this is not a new idea, because some of us have been doing this for generations. for us, she is our maa and beti (depending on errr the circumstances). and we really love and cherish her. plus we love all sorts of devis. we are just kinda underrated and under represented, sadly.
another point to be noted is that the theology of shaivism and vaishnavism seeing shiva/vishnu as the supreme respectively has nothing to do with sexism. neither of them are anti-devi or anti women, for that matter. wo alag baat hai certain followers really go around shaming the entire sect and spewing hate. shaivism and vaishnavism treats devi with the utmost respect, and she is exalted here too. so it's...not a crime if someone doesn't see devi as the supreme...unless the said person is going around saying she cannot be the supreme because she is a female.
WE ARENT ABRAHAMIC TO SAY ONLY ONE FORM IS SUPREME.
It's their own business right who they worship how they worship is personal. You aren't allowed to pass judgements on that unless they ask u to and allow you to
