#weird logic

Gabara is a toad...

Hey kusnilive, I tried to ask you this but there was too much text so here it is

Weird thing today, on FB I encountered someone in a BB group who made the claim that Blake had been stabbed by Adam 3 times, once before Beacon, and that was why her scar is crisscrossed, now of course there is no evidence for this, its not shown or said to have happened in the show, and I and others pointed this out, to which the person responded that we we’re missing things that only she was apparently seeing, that because at Argus Adam stabbed Blake in the same spot as Beacon that means he had done it before beacon (what?), and that Blake wouldn't be so scared of Adam if he wasn't physically abusive,

Now of course I don’t think it should need to be explained that you can fear someone very much without them being physically abusive, that’s the threat of violence or implying that violence would be used,

There’s also a bigger issue here, if Blake had been stabbed before Beacon by Adam, then why not bring it up as her reason for leaving the White Fang?  Why tell everyone that you left because of rising extremism?  Why would Blake still believe at the time that Adam ultimately had noble intentions if she had been stabbed by him?  Also stabbing someone isn’t abuse, that’s straight up attempted murder

This all resulted in the person who made the original post, shall we say, flipping out?  She said that I was unable to realize facts, and that it didn’t matter because I am a male and because a male’s ego is huge, therefore I didn’t realize what she did and I was just disagreeing out of ignorance (discounting my opinion while attempting to elevate her own), none of which is a refute, evidence for her point, or a counterargument against mine, merely attacking me a discounting my opinion (ad hominem), she then said she was in several other RWBY groups and made the same post, and that an admin had agreed with her so it had to be true, now I don’t understand how that makes her point valid (its a clear case of appeal to false authority), as admin on fan groups do not decide what is canon in a series, though she did say immediately after that the fact that an admin agreed with her was all that mattered to her, I doubt this is self-awareness but it does show that all she cared about was people agreeing with her

I think her problem with me was that I was using facts and evidence to take apart her argument while also asking that she provide proof to show that Blake already had a scar before beacon and that Adam was the one who gave it to her

"This character is great! They were just written poorly."

Points for creative insult???