1. Gojo is going to find the rest of the gang and it will be funny because rn they all think they killed him accidentally so the kids must be freaking out.

2. They’ll think of a plan to save Megumi.

3. Kenny’s deal with Sukuna must have something to do with him being able to create cursed objects so, (this is just an idea! 🧸 with me… ) I think Kenny wants Sukuna to create a cursed object with all the cursed energy collected during the games so he can somehow give it to Yuji to eat. Kenny knows he’s going to die and he is going to turn on Sukuna by feeding Yuji with said object and they both know it. Kenny’s goal besides the chaos he’s generated is to see his masterpiece, our boy Yuji becoming a demon god and fighting the King of curses. Idk if he’ll be alive to see it though

4. Kenny will die by Gojo’s or Sukuna’s hand and then Gojo vrs Meguna will happen

5. Gojo will die saving Megumi and the final battle will be Yuji against Sukuna inside his original body

I know Gojo said “I’ll win” but I don’t necessarily thinks he means it as “me with my own hands” but more like all the students he’s been preparing to take over

That's actually why I made this blog, as I also couldn't find other blogs doing so, and actually I'm afraid that's also likely why this blog doesn't get more traction.

You see, people are more likely to spread reactionary content, as it's just more interesting. They like to see information that already confirms their biases because it's satisfying to see something and be like "See! I KNEW I was right!"

When the truth actually lies somewhere in the middle, it's not quite as satisfying, and people are less likely to share it around as it just isn't going to appear as interesting or scratch that bias itch.

As for the content that does clear up information in favor of one side or another, I believe it's because people just don't want to sit and read something that's longer, and that would likely be my fault for the way I've presented it. I understand it can be boring to most.

I've been trying to think of a way to present the information in a way that's both factual and interesting, but I'm not sure how to do it without having to resort to giving it that reactionary spin, which is what I was trying to avoid with this blog for the sole reason that, regardless of if something is true and backed up with sources, if you present it in a reactionary way (especially if it swings more in favor of one side than the other) the supporters of the opposition just will not hear it because it's presented in a way that's attacking them, and that's what I want to avoid because it doesn't help anyone.

I agree with you that most people aren't understanding the legal documents, but more so because most every article is cherry-picking and piecemealing together information that they've taken from other articles over and over, all without having anyone actually read those documents before publishing their articles.

So, both sides (though admittedly I've mostly seen it coming from one at the moment) are going to latch onto whatever they can that supports their beliefs and claim it evidence that the other is in the wrong all without actually understanding the source or context.

And thank you. It's nice to know all my research is being appreciated even if it's just by a few at the moment lol.