#unsealed documents

That's actually why I made this blog, as I also couldn't find other blogs doing so, and actually I'm afraid that's also likely why this blog doesn't get more traction.

You see, people are more likely to spread reactionary content, as it's just more interesting. They like to see information that already confirms their biases because it's satisfying to see something and be like "See! I KNEW I was right!"

When the truth actually lies somewhere in the middle, it's not quite as satisfying, and people are less likely to share it around as it just isn't going to appear as interesting or scratch that bias itch.

As for the content that does clear up information in favor of one side or another, I believe it's because people just don't want to sit and read something that's longer, and that would likely be my fault for the way I've presented it. I understand it can be boring to most.

I've been trying to think of a way to present the information in a way that's both factual and interesting, but I'm not sure how to do it without having to resort to giving it that reactionary spin, which is what I was trying to avoid with this blog for the sole reason that, regardless of if something is true and backed up with sources, if you present it in a reactionary way (especially if it swings more in favor of one side than the other) the supporters of the opposition just will not hear it because it's presented in a way that's attacking them, and that's what I want to avoid because it doesn't help anyone.

I agree with you that most people aren't understanding the legal documents, but more so because most every article is cherry-picking and piecemealing together information that they've taken from other articles over and over, all without having anyone actually read those documents before publishing their articles.

So, both sides (though admittedly I've mostly seen it coming from one at the moment) are going to latch onto whatever they can that supports their beliefs and claim it evidence that the other is in the wrong all without actually understanding the source or context.

And thank you. It's nice to know all my research is being appreciated even if it's just by a few at the moment lol.

Made this blog to help clear up misinformation related to the outcome of the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard Trial. I enjoy research, as lame as that might sound, and so I thought this blog might be a way to put that to good use.

More info in the FAQ.

I really appreciate your blog, and I'm so glad I found it, I hope to make my opinion on the evidence instead of the hearsay (lol) which is so difficult with the case but you've made it much more palatable, so thank you! ❤️

I do have the link, and it's also been added to the Case Timeline for anyone who wanted to see them before I got around to them, but thank you anyway! (If you're referring to asks where I've said if they have the link/dates to send them, that's just if they want me to get to that specific topic sooner, because otherwise I'll just be going through in order until I come across them, which could take a bit.)

Honestly I'm not sure. I know there's a lot I could cover, but I'm just currently working through getting old drafts finished and posted first and putting together that reference timeline I mentioned.