seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from Yemen
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Kyrgyzstan
seen from Canada
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
:t (Just 2) <*> (Just 3) (Just 2) <*> (Just 3) :: (Num (a -> b), Num a) => Maybe b
"It's a thing where there's a numerical function from a thing that's a number to that thing, maybe."
*puffs weed* *flails arms wildly in front of imaginary whiteboard*
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The problem with talking about simplicity is that it becomes one of those things like “good art” that’s defined as “I know it when I see it.” This provides no guidance. We need more precision. In this blog post I want to discuss complexity from three different angles and give concrete recommendations for creating simple Scala code.
Miles Sabin: The Swiss Army Knife of Generic Programming: Shapeless’s Type Class Derivation in Action
typeclasses in Scala, explained very well
"Hands-on Unfiltered, Dispatch and Scalaz' Validation monad with the ReadWriteWeb project" by Alexandre Bertails
"Typeclass pattern" by Seth Tisue
This sounds cool.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
