consider two beings of your own imaginative invention
consider two beings of your own imaginative invention. imagine them as different from any beings you normally consider as possible, with difference meaning nothing-at-all like inverse but instead something like 'of an altogether dissimilar style'. now choose one of these two beings as your favorite, and say outloud why did you choose the one over the other one, without referring in any descriptive way to the styles, force, attributes or modes or other kind of thing that characterized their difference.
consider further two beings, themselves 'of an altogether dissimilar style' to the first two, to all other beings your might normally consider, and to each other, however they share whatever style, force, mode or attribute or other kind of thing that composed the difference you described in the previous case. now, having considered them, choose from these which is your favorite and say out loud why did you choose the one over the other one, without referring in a descriptive way to either.
consider a final two beings, these beings again 'of an altogether dissimilar style' to the first two, the second two, to all other beings, and to each other, consider the two of them for a moment, and then decide which of them you hate, a ferocious hate, an irreparable chasm, apoplectic, you spit and scream unworded sound at the one of them, you stomp your two feet into the ground to make more noise and you feel loosed from your normal body, a limberness like the power in you runs on their ending. in considering so violent a hatred for a being of your own composition, in the infinite innocence of the abstract, did you add something to your own description of that being to make it worth your hatred, and if you did, did you add it after you chose to hate it, marking it, then deforming for your purpose, or did you alter it and let the alteration carry your hate through it, like it was filled up and occupied by your malice?
