What is the difference about RQG compared to CR? What do you recommend about it because im considering listening to their game.
So I made a post about what I loved about it (although I could probably go on for ages about it...)
In terms of the differences between RQG and CR, let me see:
Whereas CR is straight-up high fantasy, RQG is steampunk-alternative universe-science fantasy. Both have elves, dragons, DnD magic, etc., but RQG places those features of fantasy in a steampunk version of the 19th century where magic and science mix.Ā
Like Matt, the DM Alex has put just so much thought into the campaign setting, and the worlds feel extremely tangible and a source of intrigue in themselves.Ā
Like CR, RQG is very character-driven, with an emphasis on the growth of the characters built into the plot and plenty of really meaningful relationships between the PCs (and between some PCs and NPCs). The characters are all (except one) thoughtful and multi-dimensional.Ā
I would say CR generally gives the characters moreĀ ābreathing roomā ā time to discuss more explicitly how theyāre feeling. Which is not to say RQG doesnāt have that, but the plot definitely has more of a sense of urgency to it, meaning that they have a little less reflection time.
If I had to compare the overarching plot of RQG to anything in CR, I think it would be the Chroma Conclave arc ā both have the general sense ofĀ āyou have a time limit to race around the world and do X.āĀ
However, like campaign 2, RQG is essentially built on a couple of central mysteries that the characters are seeking to unravel, although with aĀ greater focus on those mysteries than anything in CR. Like c2, itās also a fairly politics-driven plot at times, with several competing factions whose true motivations the characters are trying to understand.Ā
RQG has a smaller party (4 PCs) than CR, meaning that fights are generally shorter; Iām not 100% sure, but I feel like RQG has more roleplay (vs combat) than CR, though by a fairly small margin. I rarely tune out during fights in RQG the way I sometimes do with CR.Ā
However, although the encounters are short, the DM is very fond of sequences where he sends the characters into encounter after encounter with very little rest, to the point of completely depleting their spells/abilities even at higher levels. Again, this isnāt to the detriment of roleplay, because those combat-after-combat sequences happen only once or twice per season and thereās plenty of roleplay between each short encounter ā itās just a DM style thing.Ā
The RQG party loves splitting up. There are whole 4-5 episode chunks where two plots are running simultaneously and the DM jumps back and forth between them every few minutes, sometimes with hilarious whiplash, and sometimes just to keep the pace moving. It sounds weird, but trust me that it really, really works.Ā
Oh yeah, and RQG is Pathfinder, not 5E, but it doesnāt affect things as much as you might think. Like CR, there are some players who are very experienced at the game and one top of the mechanics, and some who arenāt, and they balance each other well.Ā
This is really hard, because I think RQG has more extremes than CR. On one hand, itās absolutely hilarious, and the players joke around with each other a whole lot, even during some fairly serious moments. On the other hand, the overall plot of the campaign is far darker than anything than CR, and the DM doesnāt pull any punches, and in fact, often pummels them.Ā
Itās really hard to quantify the pain that different pieces of fiction give you, particularly without spoilers, but by any measure, RQG has more:Ā
PCās loved ones being put in serious danger and/or killedĀ
Serious and permanent physical harm to the PCs in a way that affects them both mechanically and emotionally
But again, it can also be super funny, as well as very heartwarming! There are cuddles and found family! But thereās also just a whole lot of pain.Ā
Uh wow, sorry for how long that got. I hope it helps!!