saw something on Twitter the other day that really rubbed me the wrong way
I stumbled across an artist on Twitter and was scrolling through their page and noticed they post art memes of âtomboy phenotypesâ
some of these âtomboy phenotypesâ quite literally boiled down to âwoman who plays video gamesâ or âwoman who wears hoodies and forgets to shower sometimesâ and it struck me as so odd.
a woman can play video games and wear hoodies and forget to shower sometimes and still be super feminine? if she wants to be? those things donât necessarily make someone a tomboy?
the line of logic that playing video games and sometimes faltering on your hygiene are âmasculineâ enough to classify someone as a tomboy is kind of stupid and also begs the question â if you consider a woman a tomboy if she does something so innocuous and common as playing video games, then what are feminine qualities? would you therefore only grant the title of âfeminine womanâ to like, I donât know, a barefoot tradwife whose only hobbies are cooking and baking?
it just kind of seems like a slippery slope, and very similar semantically to how people try to rob trans woman and woman of color of their femininity for what are otherwise nothingburger traits like âwas angry onceâ or âhas a deep voiceâ
I guess the point of this post being that gendering traits/hobbies/clothing are stupid and we should stop doing that, and instead focus on the unique experience of each individual and how they feel that their gender presents itself (and yes this includes letting people trans their gender, TERFs donât even touch this post)