#transabusive

"If you dont accept cisharmfuls bc they're harming people, but accept transharmful bc they haven't yet than you don't see that being as their ID! That means you dont see trans people as their gender either" is the idea I've heard thrown around, basically. So here's my hot take I suppose.

There's a big difference between types of transID.

Transharmful identities aren't just social identities like genders are but action-based identities. The fact is you can identify as harmful all you want, and you are your ID, to an extent. But because harm is an action that you must act onto another person I personally will never see a transharmful person as truly harmful unless they have/are transitioning.

Unlike harm, gender (and other things like race) are purely social and cultural, which means you are your gender 100% even without transitioning.

So yes, you can see certain transIDs differently than their corresponding cisIDs bc not everything is merely a social pr cultural construct like gender is.

Reminder that you CANNOT be a system choosing to undergo final fusion and be anti-radqueer. Final fusion is inherently transsinglet which is a transid aka a RADQUEER IDENTITY.

forgive you? hmmm...i dunno! you shouldn't have done it in the first place. maybe i'll feel better if you let me wrap my hands around your neck for a while, or test my new knife. i thought you want me to feel better? what am i supposed to do with this anger then, suffer through it cause of you? it's your own fault. you hurt me. i get to hurt you now. stop being so fucking selfish for once in your life. can you do that? you think you can fucking do that?