REGENT: Whoo-, yeahp, that is a longer one. Iāve said it before and Iāll say it again; never apologize for these longer ones. With Titles being so intrinsically tied to our personalities, more information is always good information.
REGENT Iāll say from the get-go, youāve got the Aspect pretty good down, even with much more complex traits. Hope is the Aspect of personal beliefs, and as far as Aspects go, I reckon it might be one of the most corruptive and potentially damaging. And I say that having damn-near mastered the Void.
REGENT: Those bound to Hope often conjure this ideal image of themselves;Ā āIām an adventurerā,Ā āIām the only light against the darknessā,Ā āIām a suave-ass greaserā,Ā āI am the embodiment of a Kingās measureā. These conceptions can be extremely difficult to shake, even when they wind up souring and poisoning the Hope-Boundās existence.
REGENT: And yet, just as dangerous as these ideals can be to them, a Hope player can find immeasurable power in them. Just as much as the Hope player shapes these ideals that they hold to be true, so too do the ideals shape the person who made them to accurately reflect their beliefs.
REGENT: The adventurer picks up the moxxy and intuition, the bastion of hope finds the spark of power, the King emanates virtuous authority......We will not talk about the results of the greaser.
REGENT: And this duality of both boon and danger, the ideal becoming reality, and what that means - I think, is the crux of a Hope playerās evolution. Which is, ultimately, a long-winded way of sayingĀ āyouāre right on the money, hereās some additional thoughts to support itā.
REGENT: Moving onto Class, itās a bit of a tossup; my gut instinct is telling me that itās likely an Active Class, since a lot of the traits line up to be self-centric - the singleminded pursuit of their ideal, the supposition that theyāre being held back...
REGENT: But, with the knowledge of that latter point, part of me wants to lean towards Bard, due to their greater strength often being inhibited in some way. However, a similar trait rings true with the Knight, which is an Active Class.
REGENT: If I had to say, Iād give my gut the benefit of the doubt and say Bard. Though Passive, a Bard can command worldshaking power - but are often inhibited by the natures of their Aspects. It is worthwhile to note that most of the Bardās shortcomings come from a lack of conviction or adherence to their conviction - fucking dammit I just said I wasnāt going to talk about Cronus...
REGENT: Whatever. From my observations, Gamzeeās convictions - those of his dread harlequin god, his rulership over others and the subjugation of lower blood castes, were inhibited by his idiocy and willing consumption of what basically amounts to fuckloads of sleep medication and emotional suppressants.
REGENT: Whereas Cronusā convictions, if one could call them that, are constantly undermined by his own scummy nature. His desire to buddy up to people - or more specifically, have them fawn over him - is always undercut by his own tendency to abuse and harass others, interjecting where he isnāt appreciated.
REGENT: And I will say, as much as I loathe talking about Cronus, I will find it interesting to note that here, we have a similar case - a Hope-Bound Bard being the biggest thing holding themselves back.
REGENT: So, long-and-short of it, judging from the extant personality traits and issues this Achilles have to face, I would most confidently say that their Title would be the Bard of Hope. While little is known about Bards, it does have - at least to me - a satisfying closeness to Achillesā growth, and as I stated before, you were exceptionally keen to begin with to pen him as a Hope player.
REGENT: Hopefully this helps, and that you find it to be accurate. And hey- my response was pretty fuckinā long as well, so, donāt ever be shy about sending in long asks. Iād be quite the hypocrite to turn them away. .P














