I hear dogs inside of me / some are good and some are wrong / I keep feeding the wrong dogs
Melissa Broder, "Consecration," Superdoom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Jordan
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Lithuania

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Maldives
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela
seen from Lithuania
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from United States
I hear dogs inside of me / some are good and some are wrong / I keep feeding the wrong dogs
Melissa Broder, "Consecration," Superdoom

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Honestly if My Adventures With Superman is going to be doing an adaptation of "Death of Superman" next season since they're adding Superboy and already had versions of Eradicator, Steel and Hank Henshaw... I kinda want them to swap out Doomsday for someone else, to keep things a little fresh. Specifically, they can use Superboy (and maybe Bizarro??) to set up LexCorp trying to clone Superman, and then Eradicator and Henshaw as efforts to control alien tech, and then combine the methods together to introduce the single best/worst Superman villain introduced during the New 52:
Superdoom, the Last Knight of Tomorrow: a version of Superman from an alternate universe where Clark, Lois and Jimmy invented the sentient idea Superman while in college (Grant Morrison wrote this, can you tell?), only to be forced to sell it to a corporation that turned it into something extremely marketable. Not a lot of villains have an in-universe line of underpants, but Superdoom certainly does!
Anyway, I'm only half kidding about this: switching the antagonists from rogue government agencies to an amoral conglomerate gives the show a chance to critique the corporate desire to flatten human creativity into something easily packaged and boring, and Superdoom fits that bill much better than a stock-standard Doomsday appearance. His design would likely mesh well with MAWS's love of angular armored costumes, and it'd fit into Lex's obsession with having a Superman that he can control. This could also admittedly be done just by fleshing out Hank Henshaw as the superior "human" Superman and Connor Kent as a hybrid of both worlds (sidenote: he kinda looks like Lois, right?)... but also it'd be nice to pull somebody absolutely ridiculous into the show.
Which origin of Doomsday is your favorite and what do you think about 52 Superdoom?
I actually don't like Doomsday as a character. I think he's fine but way too overused and overrated. He's just a plot device of "he's there to kill superman and he's unstoppable". I'm sorry for any Doomsday fan out there.
As for 52 Superdooms? I'm conflicted over it for the same reasons. It's fine. But not noteworthy.
SEHAT - SUPERDOOM
Roland - Phase II AF-2 enclosure cast
cred: facebook.com/sehat effectors,

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Doomsday once asked superdoom to explain who the hell he thinks he is
Superdoom replied
“I’m you…but better written”
any thoughts on SuperDoomsday and how he could be utilized as a recurring villain past the Action Comics run?
Morrison took the proverbial gloves off and savagely (metaphorically) beat the shit out of WB and DC over their handling of Superman with this guy.
Metatextuality he's a criticism of the direction Morrison saw DC and WB wanting to take Superman in, a "troubled anti-hero" whose goal is selling merchandise and destroying the competition. Powers that be in the executive suites have long viewed Superman as a "problem" and made many attempts at "fixing" him in a way that would increase his appeal. Superman was invented on Earth 45 by three youngsters (that world's versions of Clark, Lois, and Jimmy). Originally he was a beautiful idea that they built as an expression of their desire to save the world, but they couldn't give him permanence on their own. So they sold him to Overcorp, which promptly cut off their control over the concept and turned him into Superdoom, a corporate mascot. Parallels to Siegel and Shuster's treatment at the hands of DC are obvious and I'm sure intentional.
Fascinating how Superdoom predates the multiple evil Supermen takes of the 2010s, but manages to criticize and deconstruct the mindset that gave rise to them nonetheless. He's Superman revamped, given a new tacticool outfit that's crafted for mass market appeal, and no boring character traits, just the iconography and the power. Built for those who insist the Injustice Superman is the best because "that's what Superman would REALLY be like", or the DCEU fans who worship a Superman who has nothing but the power levels and iconography, this is their Superman's final form. For those familiar with Morrison's obsession regarding The Bomb, Superdoom is a showcase in how even Superman can be corrupted by the same self-destructive human nature that gave rise to atomic warfare, taking ideas and converting them into weapons. Once he was meant to save everyone, now he's a Bomb (literally turning into a bomb and detonating in his final Action Comics appearance under Morrison) used to oppress, exploit, and kill.
Most interesting to me personally is the way Morrison used Superdoom to criticize the way corporations employ superheroes to expand their control over the population. Total about face from how Morrison used to view superheroes as ideas capable of uplifting and liberating us, here Morrison shows a population essentially enslaved to Overcorp after allowing this corporate character and his logo to define their lives. Surely I don't need to point out how companies such as Disney and WB are striving to do just that with their real world monopoly over superheroes? Look at how our current status quo is utterly obsessed with superheroes, they dominate all aspects and mediums of pop culture, yet the values superheroes profess certainly haven't translated into a better world have they? Instead we only watch the corporations that own them reap greater and greater rewards, while frequently the writers and artists who toiled to elevate them get either scraps or nothing at all.
As for how he could be used as a reoccurring villain, if there's ever another attempt at a "Superverse" team up after Tomasi botched the first attempt, then I think he should be the co-Big Bad with Mandrakk. Multiple variations of Supermen teaming up to take down the one evil Superman who threatens them all, the Superdoom poised to ruin the very idea of Superman, corrupting and killing every rival counterpart he encounters. Pairing up him and Mandrakk makes the most sense to me, with Mandrakk filling the evil mastermind role that Vyndktvx did in Morrison's Action Comics run. Mandrakk is the embodiment of entropy and how stories can rot, Superdoom is that concept applied specifically to Superman.
u g l i e crying