#stone lifting

Stone lifting is such a perfect modality for this lesson. Each and every stone acts as a teacher and a guide.

The main reason for this is that you can’t fake stone lifting.

Either you can get it off the ground, or you can’t.

The stone doesn't actively resist you, but it can't assist you in your attempt. You either have enough base strength to even start the pull, or you don’t.

And once you do have that strength, you enter a new world where the margin of error shrinks.

You’re now capable of moving objects heavy enough to tear skin, pull muscles, strain tendons, or ruin your day if you’re even slightly off in the process.

But the difference between "slightly off" and a successful stone lift is almost nonexistent from a “did you, didn't you” perspective.

You won't know until you try and the risk won't be known fully until the moment its over.

Maybe not even then.

That margin of error I referenced is only as broad as it needs to be and not a fraction greater.

It reminds me of something I heard many years ago about taking on a seemingly insurmountable challenge, in that to successfully complete it:

"Anything more is not necessary. Anything less is not acceptable."

Stone lifting exists in that exact space. You find yourself not interested in the stones you know you can lift, or in the stones you have already lifted. You are always going to seek out the stone that stops you, or makes you pay a toll to hoist.

It's in that recognition that you realize how much strength asks of you because strong people will push and pull until something gives.

Strength invites heavier loads, higher intensities, and riskier thresholds because being strong is only as satisfying as it is useful.

Weak people, by comparison, often break before they start.

Not because they’ve pushed too far too soon, but because their baseline wasn’t high enough to withstand the demands of the attempt in the first place.

It's not a moral failing, but it is a failure. It's limiting in clear, definable terms that can leave one feeling somewhat diminished. It can be demoralizing.

To be clear, weak or strong doesn't mean better or worse; as in, a person’s worth is based on who is stronger or weaker. It can, however, raise a question of utility.

However, how useful one is based on how strong one might be is very much context-dependent. But it's better to have it in reserve and not need it than to need it and not have it, no?

Strength comes from many places and takes many forms, but I also think that the root of all strength is a matter of how willing one is to test oneself against seemingly immovable objects.

And in that testing, one might get hurt.

Or not.

There's only one way to find out.