#speedtest

My TP-Link Archer T2U Nano AC600 USB Wifi Dongle Internet Speed Test - Part 4 (Final) in 2.4GHz [Sept 14, 2020]

Here’s my final part of my internet speed test in 2.4GHz with my new USB Wifi Dongle - TP-Link Archer T2U Nano AC600. 😁📶💻

If you haven’t seen my Part 3, then please [CLICK ME!].

IMPORTANT NOTE: *But before that, I want YOU… Yes you, which you’re reading my description. I want you to watch my recorded video first 📹📲 (as a observation) before you read the rest of my reaction experience. Hope you’re watching… And also please keep in mind; that my country (The Philippines 🇵🇭) was still one of the slowest internet connections in the world, so I would like to apologize for saying that but it is true nonetheless...😟

Now without further ado, let’s get started:

•(Now as you already done watching video.) Now once again with the same steps as before with google’s internet speed test. And much like the 5GHz wifi connection it had a different story to explain, with 33.6 Mbps download rate and (exact) 79.0 Mbps upload rate respectively seems okay. 🙂 You know, Google needs to do better in internet speed test results, it’s nothing compare to Ookla or others - but you know just saying.

•Anyways, I decided to re-install and re-plugged in my old Wireless N (TL-WN725N) once again after I uninstalled the new one (Archer T2U AC600). Because I want to tested out one more time with Google internet speed test before I unplug and uninstall the driver of the old one and revert to my new one, since the Wireless N does not have my final speedtest with google. So, here are the results.↓

Once again compare between the Wireless N (TL-WN725N) and the Archer T2U Nano’s download and upload speed rate was completely difference and still ‘okay’ as their results.👍

•Now I actually re-tested again with the new one (Archer T2U Nano) after I uninstall the old one (Wireless N) and putting back to the tech shelves, here are results.↓

The results are still reach 2.4GHz rate standards with slightly higher on the Ookla speedtest and Google internet speed test’s download rates.🙂

Now with my experience was done, now it’s time for my final overall thoughts.↓

◘ Overall ◘ • I have to say that it’s “Official”! My new Archer T2U Nano AC600 was my BIG upgrade to my old Wireless N (TL-WN725N), despite the Archer T2U Nano has far more better when it comes internet speed rates than the Wireless N (TL-WN725N); thanks to Archer T2U Nano’s superior features like, supporting 256 QAM technology which increases 2.4GHz data rate from 150 to 200 Mbps and it handles 33% performance according to the box. Plus there’s another detail about the Archer T2U Nano AC600, if I connect the 2.4GHz wifi hotspot it only suited for surfing web 🏄‍♂️ and social media sites 🗣️ (e.g. facebook, twitter), while the 5GHz wifi hotspot it only suited for HD streaming videos 🎦 (e.g. Disney+, Netflix) and lag-free gaming (e.g. online multiplayer) 🎮. Though not sure which of these GHz wifi could use for online video chat / online class, but I guess 5GHz wifi should do the job. 😉

•And as I said on the ‘IMPORTANT NOTE’ before, it doesn’t compare to other internet speed from other continent countries including southeast Asia which is the home of my country (Philippines 🇵🇭). But hey a 100+Mbps was good enough for me, and we’re hoping to find a better fiber broadband that has far more better speed rate and a fair monthly paid than our current fiber broadband someday in the near future.🙂

• Bottom-line, I think that my new USB Wifi Dongle is the REAL DEAL and thank goodness I picked (or redeemed as I assume because I redeem it at Lazada) an awesome upgrade USB Wifi Dongle. So if you want to get it and planning it to earn in case that you’re on the tight budget then please [CLICK ME!], but if you’re lived in the different continent go Amazon or Gear Best. You won’t regret with TP-Link Archer T2U Nano AC600 (or any other TP-Link brands that has far better than Archer T2U Nano). 😊

Well that’s the end of my topic. And if you want to see my recorded video as well as my review about my old TP-Link USB wifi dongle, then I’ll provide some links down below.↓

TP-Link Archer T2U Nano AC600: • Recorded Video [Sept 8, 2020] • Part 1 [Sept 9, 2020] • Part 2 [Sept 9, 2020] • Internet Speed Test in 5GHz - Part 1 (Recorded video) [Sept 11, 2020] • Internet Speed Test in 5GHz - Part 2 (Recorded video) [Sept 11, 2020] • Internet Speed Test in 2.4GHz - Part 3 (Recorded video) [Sept 14, 2020]

TP-Link Wireless N Nano USB Adapter TL-WN725N • Part 1 [Jun 22, 2019] • Part 2 [Jun 23, 2019] • Internet Speed Test [Jun 25, 2019]

Amazon ist nicht gleich Amazon

Seit 2014 benutzen wir einen kleinen Stick am Fernseher, um ihn smarter zu machen. Der Stick kann im Gegensatz zu unserem Fernseher streamen und direkt per HDMI-Anschluss in den Fernseher speisen. Diese 40 € waren sehr gut investiertes Geld, weil wir seit 6 Jahren einen technisch überholten Fernseher ohne WLAN-Funktionalität weiterbenutzen können, ohne Komfort einzubüßen.

Seit Beginn der Pandemie hat Amazon Prime Video massive Probleme beim Streaming zur besten Sendezeit abends nach 20 Uhr. Das Bild stockt ständig oder wird auf grobe Klötzchen minimiert.

An unserer Internetverbindung liegt das nicht. Laut Speedtest haben wir regelmäßig Datenraten über 30 Mbit/s, das sollte für mehrere parallele Streams dicke reichen. Aber nicht nur der Speedtest findet, dass das reicht. Amazon selbst findet das auch: Wenn wir über die Website am Laptop streamen, ist das Bild flüssig und hochaufgelöst. Nur ist das Bild eben viel kleiner, weshalb wir ja überhaupt den Stick gekauft haben.

Möglicherweise ist das ein Fall von geplanter Obsoleszenz, bei dem Amazon versucht, uns einen neuen Stick schmackhaft zu machen. Zumindest haben sie technisch die Möglichkeit, neuere Modelle zu erkennen und ihnen Priorität einzuräumen.

Vielleicht sollten wir einen neuen Stick kaufen – aber nicht heute! Wir schließen den Laptop mit einem ungenutzten HDMI-Kabel an den Fernseher an und müssen nur dran denken, dass wir die Fernbedienung des Sticks nicht zum Anhalten nutzen können.

Speedtest’in 2019 yılının ilk altı aylık dönemini kapsayan raporuna göre dünya genelindeki ortalama indirme ve yükleme hızları güncellendi. Hazırlanan yeni listeye göre Türkiye oldukça kritik bir konumda yer alıyor.

“OpenSpeedTest is written in Vanilla JavaScript. No Third-Party frameworks or libraries were used. The unexpected side effect of using Vanilla JavaScript is High Performance. OpenSpeedTest contains only STATIC Files like HTML, CSS & JS, so you don’t need to worry about Security Updates or Hidden Exploits that may compromise your secure environments.”

You may want to use something like this if:

You have employees working from home, and they want to do a basic speed test to the office to check their connection is OK.

You want to stress test or benchmark your home network from various devices to a server, a media machine, etc.

Or to test between two client devices across your LAN.

By doing the test from various locations around the home, you can see how your Wi-Fi speed varies from different places.

Also test from a private browser window to see if extensions are slowing your browser down.

Do tests before and after network changes to see what impact it has e.g. when adding a LAGG interface between the server and the router.

Host it on a public web server for users to check their connection speed.

The server side stores no data so it is just a question of spinning up a docker container, and connecting with any browser to run the test (nothing to install on the client device). My docker container used 0% CPU while not doing a test, and used about 45 MB of RAM. It jumped to 17% CPU during the test.

You can optionally save speed test results to a database, but it points to an external database that you have running somewhere.