"...she loves freebies." (Suits Crew Member 2018)
'Sticky Fingers' is just a Case of Royal Protocol š
MESSY makes matters worse with ROYAL protocol excuses! In her demented mind, Royal Protocol requires that Meghan Markle:
walk off every photoshoot with all the items she wore to prevent wardrobe assistants from re-selling the (touched by royalty) garments on ebay. (we know she re-sells the clothes on ebay & that she borrowed and returned garments while in the brf)
archive her attire. "A different source pushed back on the regal tale by telling us no one was ever told of this rule. āItās a fib!ā insisted our source."
"In 2024, journalist Vanessa Grigoriadis claimed on Andrew GoldāsĀ āHereticsā podcastĀ that the former royal took āa lot of stuffā after she āwore it in a very high-profile photo shoot.ā Whatās shocking about hearing these kinds of alleged stories is that somebody who is living in a $15 million plus mansion in Montecito, whoās just had $100 million deals, would care enough to take home some jewelry and clothes from a photoshoot that she can clearly afford,ā Grigoriadis, a contributing writer at the New York Times Magazine and Vanity Fair, said on the podcast."
Wardrobeā¦ miscommunication? A source tells Page Six that Meghan MarkleĀ allegedly walked away from a 2022 Variety cover shootĀ with a $1,695 green gown because it was all part of āarchivingā her clothes as a royal. Others are crying fashion foul.Ā Markle had viewers doing double takes over the weekendĀ when a trailer for herĀ show, āWith Love, Meghan Holiday Celebration,ā showed her in a dressĀ allegedly kept from a 2022 Variety cover shoot.Ā A fashion source tells Page Six that Markle, ātook the dress from the shoot without asking,ā confirming rumblings that the pricey one-shoulder, emerald green Galvan āUshuaiaā gown had disappeared from the photo shoot. A second source confirmed to Page Six that Markle ended up with the dress. However, a third source told us that everyoneās getting their knickers in a twist over nada, claiming that MarkleĀ mustĀ take the clothes as a royal ā and that the whole hubbub is likely āa misunderstanding.ā A spokesperson for the Sussexes commented after our piece published: āThe insinuation that any items were taken without the full knowledge and agreement of the on-set stylists or their respective teamsā was ācategorically false.ā The rep also told us that, āAny items kept, were done so in total transparency and in accordance with contractual arrangements.ā
Aquazzara Shoe Thief
Ugly in Chanel with & without shoes
