"I've always thought that if you do two jobs with an actor then it's the second one that will confirm a friendship. I did two films with Rupert Graves- we did Maurice together and then, a few years later, we did Handful of Dust.
"We got on terribly well doing Maurice and then we didn't see each other for a while, but after Handful of Dust, it really cemented a great friendship and he's now one of my closest friends." - James Wilby (2003)
.Maurice (1987)
.Handful of Dust (1989)
.Clapham Junction (2007)
.The Nightmare Worlds of H.G. Wells: The Moth (2016)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hi, so I just found out that some blessed soul uploaded Clapham Junction on Youtube with portuguese subtitles and I'm gonna re-watch it but since the curiosity speaks louder is that true that Robin's character has AIDS? I read it in some blog but since when I first watched it was without subtitles (and all the english and portuguese subtitles that I tried to download were totally desynchronized) there may be some hints that I missed during the movie.
Hello! Thanks for your question! I think I’ve read the same claim somewhere on Tumblr, and I had the same reaction you did: I was surprised that the blogger sounded so certain about a detail that, IMO, is more ambiguous. I watched Clapham Junction again last night to check, and I still think the same.
First, and important, I’m sure that Rupert’s character Robin Cape doesn’t have full-blown AIDS. ‘HIV/AIDS’ indicates a spectrum of immune-system deficiency, and Robin isn’t presented as being seriously ill (let alone terminally ill).
The detail that’s left more open to viewers’ interpretation is that Robin might, possibly, be HIV positive, with related health issues that are successfully controlled by medication. As viewers, we may infer this (from the dialogue, and from other cues such as the tone of voice used by the other characters). BUT it is never stated directly – and, interestingly, nor is it ever confirmed by Robin himself.
Despite all that, ‘hints’ are dropped about Robin’s health. But what do they consist of? To be precise, three other characters make insinuations about Robin’s health – which Robin either ignores or subtly resists. The question of his ‘well’ness is raised three times – three people all comment (gratuitously, and pointedly) that Robin looks ‘well’:
1) The TV drama producer Frank (Neil Pearson), who refuses to commission Robin’s gay-drama script – and whom (Robin’s parting questions suggest) may also be gay (or bisexual) but is now (hetero) married.
2) Belinda (Rachael Blake), the dinner-party hostess, and the wife of Robin’s old friend Roger (Tom Beard).
3) Crudest of the three, dinner-party guest Natasha (Phoebe Nicholls). Natasha is the only one who pushes this further to strongly insinuate (but still not state directly) that Robin has HIV. She comments ominously that Robin looks well ‘considering’, and that his illness means he can no longer go (gay) clubbing. Robin responds that none of them at the dinner party (gay or straight) go clubbing any more because they’re too old – but, as we know, Robin has just been cruising.
This pattern is (I think) open to more than one interpretation. (Either Robin is living with drug-controlled HIV. Or, actually, he isn’t, but the heteronormative characters assume, stereotypically, that if a gay man has been ill he must have AIDS.) Within CJ, Robin’s HIV status is never confirmed. But whether or not Robin actually has HIV, the bigger point is that he encounters a series of supposedly ‘enlightened, liberal’ middle-class characters who voice heteronormative assumptions about gay men which are actually prejudices – which Robin (subtly) resists or challenges. (My theory is that Robin functions as a kind of avatar for CJ’s writer Kevin Elyot himself – making the role a really interesting and important one for Rupert.)
All the characters who comment on Robin ‘looking well’ are either heterosexual or (the ironically named Frank!) possibly closeted. And the unfolding Theo (Luke Treadaway)–Tim (Joseph Mawle) plotline eventually shows us that the character who is most outspoken about Robin’s health – Natasha – is a person who over-dramatises, overreacts, and jumps to conclusions. She uncritically accepts local rumours that Tim is a dangerous paedophile, and rushes to ‘save’ her ‘baby’, Theo, from Tim – even though CJ makes it 100% clear to viewers that Theo actively seeks, and instigates, sex with Tim (to the extent that under-age Theo tops the older man).
In short, the character who most strongly insinuates that Robin might be ill due to HIV is shown to have unreliable judgement (and to easily believe rumours) – while Robin’s non-responses, and other conflicting evidence (Robin’s casual sex with Julian), leave open the possibility that Robin’s illness was something else and that he isn’t even HIV positive.
So my friend bought me some Robin underwear and Robin socks. The briefs are tight as shit, and I can't walk around in them without something falling out. TMI? No such thing. Mwahaha! And I can't pull the socks up all the way because my legs are too big. I bike more than you breathe. Maybe that's why. The socks and the briefs have capes. So, in the bottom picture, you can see 4 different capes, including the one tied around my neck. And the tie I just threw on for shits. "Holy Barbecued Jesus, Batman!"