Reading Break - Worms & Spiders
Featured Art:
MotaArt: (above)
Rick Leonardi & Al Williamson:Ā Spider-man 2099 #1
Mark Bagley & Art Thibert:Ā Ultimate Spider-man #11
Patrick Olliffe: Amazing Spider-man Family #3
Itās been longer since I last posted here than I'd hoped it would be.Ā Unfortunately, Iāve had to prioritize work for the time being, and itāll probably be a little while longer before I have the opportunity to post my next episode review [TNG ep. 123 will be next in line, when I do finally get to it].Ā In lieu of writing, Iāve been trying to be at least bit more mindful with my downtime, avoiding the various social media timewasters, and taking more time to read.
For my "serious" reading, Iāve been slowly picking away at āGod Emperor of Duneā, which is pretty fucking trippy.Ā Seriously, If you thought the first book was weird, then Iām here to tell you that whatever "spice" Frank Herbert was using, he upped the dose exponentially for each subsequent entry.Ā Iāve read a lot of disparaging reviews and comments online about āGod Emperorā that led me to believe it might be pompous and dull, but Iāve honestly found it to be thoroughly engaging, though admittedly subject-at-times to some ignorant world views.
For my "fun" reading, my recent reviews of āSpider-man: TASā have inspired me to peruse through my old Spidey comics, which have been a real trip down memory lane (and very on-brand for this blog). The two series Iāve been bouncing between are the original āUltimate Spider-manā from the early 00ās, and āSpider-man 2099ā (early 90ās).Ā I remember when each respective series was first being released, and how cutting edge each of them seemed.Ā Overall, Iād say they hold up decently well, although clearly products of their time.
āSpider-man 2099ā is unsurprisingly the more noticeably dated of the two, and a lot of that comes down to the now-unmistakeable 90ās aesthetic, along with the somewhat clunky āfuture slangā, which seems to predominantly consist of substituting profanity with vaguely techno-sounding-words. Ā If you donāt know what the Shock Iām talking about you can go look it up for yourself. But Itās Rick Leonardiās artwork where the book really stands out to me, though.Ā I always thought he was an underappreciated artist, and deserved a proper run on ASM, but 2099 probably gave him a better opportunity to flex his talents.
I feel like a lot of people forget today (as I suppose they inevitably tend to) that Ultimate Spider-man was once THE hottest Spider book on the market, and while reboots-featuring-a-teenage-peter-parker may be a dime a dozen today, it was a breath of fresh air in the year 2000.Ā Itās easy to see why too, Bendis and Bagley work great together, and it didnāt hurt that Marvel spared no expense on the physical presentation of the book.Ā Simply put, each issue looks sharp, from the digitally painted cardstock covers, to the glossy pages; this was a book with high production values, featuring top tier talent. No expense was spared in making sure the artists were featured in the best possible light.
One thing Iāve canāt help but notice is the differences in attitudes and ideals between the two books. I know a lot of people like to pretend that comics were less political āback in the dayā but thatās never been true.Ā I do think that politics have sometimes been easier to ignore during times of less civil unrest, but clearly the writers have always had opinions and ideals that were being expressed whether they knew it or not.Ā For instance, Peter Davidās work on 2099 seems to lean more politically left, and is notably quite critical of nationalist, corporate, and capitalist interests, depicting a world that feels (in some ways) more relevant now than it was back when the series was being released.
Comparatively, Bendisā writing seems to play it a bit safer.Ā He appears largely progressive in his social views, but also less willing to criticize institutions like the military or government beyond anything on a surface level.Ā I canāt say itās too surprising, since āUltimate Spider-manā only began itās run shortly before the 9/11 attacks, and I can imagine that even if he were inclined to do so, Bendis would have likely received pushback from anything deemed too politically controversial. But some of his writing leads me to suspect he falls towards a more politically centrist stance, resulting in a book that, while being LOADS of fun, has perhaps less to say on certain social issues. Some people might argue itās for the best, but I kinda like it when writers are willing to get a bit messy, as I think it makes for more interesting discourse.Ā But then again, maybe Iāll find myself eating these words as I continue my read through.
I think thatās enough musing from me.Ā The fact remains that each of the artists Iāve discussed in this post are far more accomplished than I will likely ever be.Ā Ā At any rate these criticisms are really more just meandering observations, about which I could easily change my mind later on.Ā Hopefully Iāll have more time to focus on my proper episode reviews in the coming months.
But if youāve made it this far, thanks for hanging out.