I saw your post on why you're lutheran just now, it hits so much of what I love about the church on the head! I am Pennsylvania Dutch and raised ELCA, and I find that the denomination is plain and practical, just like us. We did really learn about the politics of the age of the Bible and Martin Luther's kidney stones. I find too that a lot of the people in my community are more religious than spiritual. Both sets of my grandparents went (when they were still living) or currently go to church frequently, but it was less about their personal connection with God and more about the connection to the community and ritual.
I became muslim almost nine years ago, and admittedly, sometimes I miss being lutheran. It still feels like home in a way that mosques don't. I somehow went to a high school in Pennsylvania Dutchland where all the muslims were gay, but as soon as I graduated I learned that outside of my bubble that just wasn't true. I'm rambling, but I credit a lot to lutheranism for giving me a balanced approach to life, and I think it's one of the most balanced branches of christianity when it comes to tradition and ritual/ progressive ideals.
Hi anon this ask is very old and I donāt know if you even come round these parts anymore but Iāve thought of it often.
I too think we tend to bring balance to place and time, though sometimes I think the church structure does flirt with maintaining respectability above the radical acts of change that our neighbors need. But I suppose that is a risk that comes inherent to institution.
I think Lutherans of generations past fall easily into more religious than spiritual, and I see this changing. In a chaotic world that has little social capital afforded to religion, I am seeing more people come to the church in search of a personal relationship with God. It is a beautiful thing. Then again, I think community is also a manifestation of God and ritual can be a vessel for that. Thereās always a home for you here, even if itās closer to going back to your parents during college, instead of the place you want to raise your own family (if that makes sense).
As for your second ask on pacifism, for me it is thus: I am a pacifist, and I will never tell anyone else they need to be one. I donāt necessarily even think it is a viable outlook on a national defense scale, though if we dreamt big enough, maybe it could be. I will always place the blame at the feet of the systems that ultimately cause violenceā empire, state, rulers, oppressors, and not the people desperately trying to get free of oppressions grasp. That being said, I think even reactionary violence must be carefully used, lest it runs away with itself. I, personally, never, ever want to be a part of the cycle of violence. Even if it is in defense, I donāt want to feed it I want to break it. I spent a night in jail once and saw the way the sheriffs officers treated a woman detoxing from something, and thought about how the way she was being treated there would only and could only make her life after release worse. I never want to be a part of that on any side, I never want to provoke a hand that might hit someone else or tempt an angry man to be angrier. Does this make sense?