Someone please explain to me how psychogenic seizures are not just 'fake seizures'
Patients with psychogenic seizures (non-epileptic seizures) canât control their seizures and really think they are having an epileptic seizure, so accusing them of faking it would be cruel and counterproductive. Psychogenic seizures can sometimes be a somatic manifestation of an underlying psychiatric condition. The patient is not faking it, although the seizures are not due to abnormal cortical activity, they are a manifestation of another psych pathology and the patient may not necessarily have control over it. And because I canât stretch how real these can be; people have died due to car accidents caused by nonepileptic seizures.Â
Psychogenic seizures are âfake seizuresâ, but the word âfakingâ implies âintentionally deceiving.â Fake seizures would be considered malingering. If the underlying motivation is some sort of secondary gain (ie: a homeless person doesnât want to be discharged so they fake seizures to stay longer) these would not be considered psychogenic, but malingering.
Psychogenic seizures/seizure like activity could also be due to: Catatonia, Delirium, Conversion disorder (functional neurological symptom disorder), Factitious Disorder, Malingering. Only in the latter two is the person intentionally producing the symptoms.Â
There are other diagnoses, and complexities such as psychological factors that can influence medical illnesses in those seizures, where people with epilepsy also have pseudoseizures. Â Also, I cannot tell you how many neurologists have also been wrong about seizures being pseudoseizures. For many neurologists, psychiatric history + seizures = pseudoseizures.