Some of you need to learn that experiencing different flavors of transphobia doesn't constitute privilege. I'm sorry, but the framework of "This group doesn't experience trans[x]ism therefore they are privileged." Is flawed.
I never want to hear the words "transfems don't experience anti-transmasculinity, which is a privilege" in the same way the words "transmascs don't experience transmisogyny, which is a privilege."
You sound fucking goofy and this isn't how "privileged" vs "oppressed" dynamics work. Falling more within experiencing one axis of oppression, especially one that has so much overlap with the other under general transphobic oppression isn't a privilege.
What is a privilege is being a part of majority, or non-marginalized groups; E.I. white, goyim, perisex, abled, neurotypical, etc.
If you are a white trans person, you hold privilege over trans people of color. If you are white, you do not experience the intersection of racism with transphobia, which is an axis of privilege. If you are perisex and trans, you hold privilege over intersex trans people because you do not experience the intersection of intersexism with transphobia.
This is not the same as experiencing different flavors of transphobia based on your gender identity, sorry. Neither transfems or transmascs hold any sort of power over the other based on their identities as trans people and their gender alone.
No, I don't want to hear the "socialized male" or "men/males no matter what have access to the patriarchy" bullshit, so save it. You'll just get blocked for being a TERF and for being ignorant to how racialized masculinity is treated.
This also doesn't account for transneutral, transandrogynous, etc. individuals who may experience a mixture of both or exorsexism. It doesn't account for people who are transfemmasc, or intersex trans people who may experience both transmasculinization alongside transfeminization.
