The two problems i have with calling images generated by machine learning "art".
Art is expression through a medium, and by that definition, machine learning cannot generate art. There is no cognitive, psychological or emotional difference between Midjourney and Control Panel. It's all manipulation of numbers, incapable of emotion or expression.
Machine learning will reference existing art. If those artists haven't consented to their art being used, that's not right. Collaging is a form of art because it uses human creativity to combine many different pieces into one. However, machine learning is basically just another form of tracing. It has no creativity.
So everyone that makes digital art and hasn't heard, there are two tools developed by the University of Chicago called Glaze and Nightshade.
Glaze is a tool to defend against neural networks mimicking art styles. It causes the neural networks to output weird and mangled versions of what would be generated otherwise: https://glaze.cs.uchicago.edu/downloads.html
Nightshade is a tool to 'poison' datasets and confuse neural networks into generating incorrect images. It turns hats into cakes: https://nightshade.cs.uchicago.edu/downloads.html
Use these to defend against models that steal art. Remember, they are taking your art without asking for permission, and it's their fault if it screws up their models. It's like Mark Rober's glitter bomb. It's not his fault the package was trapped, why should it be your fault when your Nightshaded art poisons a dataset?