Do you support bi aspecs and labels under the bi umbrella or are you a battleaxe bi?
yeah, i do!! i apologize, maybe you read some of my older posts when i was a BAB. i tried to delete as many as i could the other day, but i'm sure some of them from april or so still linger.
i still think pan and other mspec microlabels have suspicious or straight-up malicious origins, as far as i'm aware in my research (i could be wrong. feel free to correct me respectfully!), but i don't think that defines the labels themselves today or their community. in all honesty i just don't have a strong opinion on the discourse anymore, it is what it is. that's part of the reason why i stopped posting about it. you're absolutely welcome here if you fall under the bi umbrella, but just keep in mind that i discuss/tag things as bi and that inherently includes other mspec labels without specifically naming them.
also, i'm demiromantic, or more accurately, probably cupio and/or really close to just being straight-up aro (as well as maybe gray-acespec somewhere). i've talked about that before!! why wouldn't i support others like me lol lmao??
DISCOURSERS, please just... don't interact. don't think about it (unless you wish to talk about pan history). i don't care what side you're on, this is not the post for it and i'm not interested. i won't argue with anyone. bye.
