« This is a very me thing to say: It’s very 19th century. This is how politics used to be. You know, a guy like Abraham Lincoln impressed people not because he was erudite, but because he was 6-foot-4. He was a giant, strange-looking man, who also happened to be an erudite, interesting guy.
But the importance of presence, of rhetorical skill, of attention grabbing — these are classic, old-fashioned political skills, and I actually think it’s a good thing that it’s coming back. People are recognizing the importance of being able to perform politics as much as being able to be a good legislator. You need to be able to do both, but I think Democrats in particular have lost, or forgotten, the importance of political performance. »
— Jamelle Bouie at the New York Times The Opinions podcast.
Transcript. Archived transcript.
Many pundits and analysts get bogged down in policy and ideology. They are puzzled by phenomena like "Obama-Trump voters".
Quite frankly. a majority of voters DON'T think in terms of ideology. This is particularly annoying to some people on the left who spend a disproportionate amount of time splitting hairs over policy and dogma.
The overhyped factionalism in the Democratic Party between alleged centrists and progressives has less to do with ideology than things like conventionalism vs. innovation or diplomatic vs. outspoken or structuralist vs. activist.
Voters today want politicians who are more willing to publicly go to bat for them – regardless of ideology. And if those politicians are more distinctive, like Barack Obama (or Abe Lincoln in the 19th century), then all the better.
Democrats should seriously avoid decaf for the foreseeable future. There's nothing wrong with performative politics as long as there is substance behind it.