I ordered this bookcase solely because it is blue (I like things that are blue), and it's damn near 7 feet tall! It's perfect and now I need 10 more!

Product Placement
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Love Begins

tannertan36
★
🪼
Cosmic Funnies
Monterey Bay Aquarium


roma★
ojovivo

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
official daine visual archive
Mike Driver
NASA
RMH
Color Me Curious
Keni

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from Türkiye
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Morocco

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Greece
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Argentina
@deadpresidents
I ordered this bookcase solely because it is blue (I like things that are blue), and it's damn near 7 feet tall! It's perfect and now I need 10 more!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Recently I read somewhere that president John Quincy Adams served 9 terms in congress sometime after his presidency. Compared to modern times, do you think it would be practical/possible/likely for future presidents to serve in different offices(like the senate or a cabinet position, etc) after their terms?
That's a great question.
Yes, former President John Quincy Adams spent the last 17 years of his life in the U.S. House of Representatives. In fact, he collapsed at his desk in the House while casting a vote and actually died in the U.S. Capitol building. The only other Presidents who held a different office after leaving the White House were Andrew Johnson, who briefly served in the U.S. Senate until his death, and William Howard Taft, who was appointed to the Supreme Court eight years after leaving the Presidency and was Chief Justice of the United States from 1921-1930. (I guess you could also include former President John Tyler, who served in the Confederate Congress shortly before his death after Virginia seceded from the Union.)
I can't imagine a modern President doing what Adams, Johnson, or Taft did. It's technically possible, but I just think it would be much more difficult now. It seems like it would feel like a demotion or a step backwards and, after exercising the vast powers of the modern Presidency, holding a legislative position or a Cabinet office would be frustrating. Instead of being an executive -- and not just any executive, but the chief executive of all chief executives -- a former President in the House would be one of 435 or one of 100 in the Senate. I feel like a former President would feel handcuffed by the lack of executive power in Congress or as a member of the Cabinet. It would also be risky for a a President to appoint a former President to their Cabinet, because there would always be questions about potential power struggles or competing loyalties -- kind of like the debates when there were two Popes living in the Vatican following Pope Benedict XVI's resignation and Pope Francis's election.
There was also some reasoning behind the post-Presidential political careers of John Quincy Adams, Andrew Johnson, and William Howard Taft. In Taft's case, he would have preferred a career entirely spent in the judiciary, rather than in political office. He had long hoped for an appointment to the Supreme Court, but the timing had never been right for him. When President Harding appointed him to the Supreme Court as Chief Justice, Taft was ecstatic. It was his dream job. Andrew Johnson's election to the Senate after his Presidency was seen as redemption for him after his disastrous time in the White House. Johnson was the first President to be impeached and had only survived removal of office by the narrowest of margins. To be elected to the Senate after all of that -- the same body where his impeachment trial had been held -- gave him a sense of vindication.
For John Quincy Adams, there were several reasons that made serving in Congress after his Presidency appealing to him. First and foremost was the fact that he had been in public service since he was a child. Adams went to Europe with his father during the diplomatic missions that John Adams held during the American Revolution, and was so brilliant and useful that he was private secretary to the U.S Minister to Russia when JQA was 14 years old! So, John Quincy Adams felt rudderless when he was not in public service. Getting elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1830 allowed JQA to be a voice in opposition to President Andrew Jackson, who had defeated Adams's bid for reelection to the White House in 1828. After facing off in bitter campaigns in 1824 and 1828, there was no love lost between Adams and President Jackson, and a seat in Congress ensured that Adams remained a potent political figure. In many ways, his 17 post-Presidential years in Congress were much more influential than JQA's single, four-year term in the White House. As perhaps the most outspoken supporter of the abolition of slavery of any elected official in the United States at the time, Adams was a one-man antislavery movement in the House at a moment when most of the nation wasn't ready to have that debate yet. Congressman Adams was also a major critic of the Mexican-American War and President Polk's actions in triggering the conflict. The post-Presidential Congressional service of John Quincy Adams helped shape his legacy as one of the most influential and accomplished public servants in American history.
If a modern President were to hold office after leaving the White House, I think it would have to be because they had a reason, like John Quincy Adams (continued service), Andrew Johnson (vindication), or William Howard Taft (achieving what he saw as his professional destiny). Holding what would undoubtedly feel like a lesser position after having the massive power of the Presidency would likely be unfulfilling without a specific purpose. I could see a former President accepting a role like Secretary-General of the United Nations or Secretary-General of NATO because that would allow them to play a significant role in foreign policy (although it's highly unlikely that an American would be elected to one of those jobs -- especially the UN gig considering the veto powers of Russia and China), but I can't envision a modern President spending their post-Presidency in Congress or the Cabinet.
Do you think J. D. Vance is the front runner to win the 2028 election right now?
So much can happen between now and 2028 that it's almost silly to guess, but I'll answer the question anyway.
I don't think Vice President Vance is the frontrunner for the GOP nomination. First of all, I just don't think people like him. I think a lot of voters -- even Republicans -- have a preference for other candidates, and the 2028 election will probably be one of those wide-open races since Trump can't run again. In my opinion, Marco Rubio has been vastly more influential in the second Trump Administration. Now, that isn't necessarily a good thing considering the foreign policy debacle that has been the Iran War, but with Rubio in the Kissinger role of Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, I think he's established himself more than Vance.
With Trump out of the picture in 2028, I think there are a lot of Republicans who will be looking to run for President, so it's no guarantee that anyone from the Administration will even be the frontrunner. I'm guessing that Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley will almost certainly take a shot at the White House, along with a number of Governors. And, of course, Democrats are already lining up and testing the waters for 2028.
When it comes to Vance, there's also an important fact to remember: Only four sitting Vice Presidents have been elected President directly from the Vice Presidency. The last time it happened was when George H.W. Bush was elected to succeed Ronald Reagan in 1988. But other than that, the last time an incumbent Vice President was elected to the Presidency was nearly 200 years ago (Martin Van Buren in 1836). The other two times were the first two VPs -- John Adams in 1796 and Thomas Jefferson in 1800. So, being the incumbent Vice President isn't necessarily an advantage when running for the Presidency; it is actually something that has rarely happened in American history.
I'm in the middle of reorganizing, cleaning, and trying to find some sort of order for my books. This is part of what I'm currently working with:
By the way, this is only about half of my books. The other half is in a storage unit because I literally don't have enough space in my apartment for them
is it true that george w. bush is the only president who never lost an election at any level?
No, that's not true. There have been a number of Presidents who never lost an election at any level, especially if you're only focused on general elections and not including primary elections or unsuccessful party nominations.
Plus, George W. Bush did lose an election (and Al Gore would probably argue that Bush also lost the 2000 Presidential election until the Supreme Court got involved!). But, like Barack Obama, Bush lost an often-overlooked election for Congress early in his political career. In Bush's case, he was unsuccessful in a bid for the U.S. House of Representatives from Texas in the general election of 1978.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
What president do you think had the most net positive effect on the world/country
If we're talking about positive impacts stemming directly from their Presidency, I think the answer is probably FDR.
If we look at the impact from the entire lives and careers of Presidents (not specifically limited to their time in the White House), there are two candidates that people might not think of. Jimmy Carter famously spent his long post-Presidency doing incredible work around the world that directly affected a vast number of people around the globe. And Herbert Hoover organized and led relief groups during and after World War I that helped feed tens of millions of starving people throughout war-torn Europe. As Secretary of Commerce under Presidents Harding and Coolidge, Hoover also help direct famine relief efforts in the Soviet Union that saved millions of lives. Before he even ran for President in 1928, Hoover was one of the most widely-admired people in the world and nicknamed "The Great Humanitarian". The failures of his four years in the White House overshadowed many of those accomplishments. Hoover's global relief projects were so remarkable and successful that he probably would be remembered as one of the great heroes of American history had he never ran for the Presidency.
Has anyone else ever ordered a huge, multi-section bookcase, taken one look at the instructions and vast amount of parts required for assembly, and then immediately taped the box shut and initiated a return?
Yeah...me neither. I definitely didn't do that this afternoon.
The only real question about Buchanan is and should always be: "Did America have a secret traitor President or was he just so dumb that he didn't see his Secretary of War committing treason?"
I don't think Buchanan was a traitor or dumb. I think he underestimated the lengths that secessionists were ready to go towards the end of his term, particularly after Lincoln's election, and he was paralyzed by either fear or resignation that he was powerless to do anything to stop secession. It doesn't excuse him, though. Buchanan didn't want to start the war by making it look like he was taking action that could trigger hostilities. But his inaction allowed the embryonic Confederacy to build up early advantages that the South never should have been able to have once the war did start.
It is crazy to me that Buchanan's Secretary of War that you referenced -- John B. Floyd -- isn't as well-known as Benedict Arnold because Floyd was arguably an even bigger traitor. All of the Confederate soldiers were traitors, but Floyd should be remembered as one of America's biggest villains. He committed Treason (with a capital 'T') while he was a still not only a member of Buchanan's Cabinet, but the civilian leader second in command authority of the U.S. military behind only the President.
Ulysses S. Grant made sure to remind everybody of Floyd's treachery several times throughout his Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant (BOOK | KINDLE), suggesting in his section about the Battle of Fort Donelson where Floyd commanded the opposing Confederate forces, that Floyd was particularly anxious about being captured by Union troops when the Confederates were about to surrender (Floyd gave up command before the formal surrender and fled):
"General Floyd, the commanding officer, who was a man of talent enough for any civil position, was no soldier and, possibly, did not possess the elements of one. He was further unfitted for command, for the reason that his conscience must have troubled him and made him afraid. As Secretary of War he had taken a solemn oath to maintain the Constitution of the United States and to uphold the same against all its enemies. He had betrayed that trust.
As Secretary of War he was reported through the northern press to have scattered the little army the country had so that the most of it could be picked up in detail when secession occurred. About a year before leaving the Cabinet he had removed arms from northern to southern arsenals. He continued in the Cabinet of President Buchanan until about the 1st of January, 1861, while he was working vigilantly for the establishment of a confederacy made out of United States territory. Well may he have been afraid to fall into the hands of National troops. He would no doubt have been tried for misappropriating public property, if not for treason, had he been captured."
El problema de no conocer la historia verdadera, es causa de la ignorancia de los jóvenes que están siendo adiestrados por los enemigos del progreso y los derechos humanos.
Sí es cierto.
As a history fan are you enjoying the new Larry David show about America?
It's hit-or-miss, but I appreciate the idea. The sketch where Larry David plays James Buchanan hosting a state dinner but he's only serving passed appetizers because he doesn't want to sit down and talk with people who linger at the table was pretty fun. Jefferson Davis getting hungry and pissed off ("It's just these bullshit trays...I'm almost certain I had a pig's dick wrapped in bacon") before Buchanan taunts him to go secede if he wants to live in a country that "lingers" is the type of thing that makes me wonder if it was specifically written for my sense of humor. Larry's famously a history buff -- and a Presidential history buff -- so you can tell this is something he did partly to entertain himself.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hi there!
Quick question - who was the tallest of FDR's VPs?
I think Henry Wallace was slightly taller than Truman, who I believe was 5'9". It definitely wasn't Cactus Jack Garner, who was only like 5'6".
It's hard to tell in photos where they are together. Here's Speaker Sam Rayburn, former President Harry S. Truman, former Vice President John Nance Garner, and Senate Majority Leader LBJ celebrating Garner's 90th birthday in 1958:
And here's a photo of James F. Byrnes (who would become Secretary of State a few weeks later), President Truman, and former Vice President Wallace at FDR's funeral in April 1945:
Interestingly, that photo of Byrnes, Truman, and Wallace captures the three main contenders (along with Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas) to be FDR's running mate in 1944. Wallace was being pushed out, but Byrnes, Truman, and Douglas (not pictured) were who FDR was considering to replace Wallace on the ticket. Any of them could have ended up succeeding Roosevelt as President on the day that this photo was taken if they had been the VP nominee.
Do you have sisters or nieces?
-- Madison C.
Am I crazy for being uncomfortable with someone with that username who hasn't made any posts to their blog asking me that specific question?
What do you think of John Kerry X George Bush Jr as a couple 🤔
I don't.
I completely forgot that I went on a little shopping spree recently on the LBJ LIbrary store's website, so it was a fun reminder when I checked my mail today. Note the badass original LBJ "Cinderella" stamps from 1964! I also love the plaid McGovern/Shriver button. Hubert H. Humphrey's "HHH" button is a good one, too.
Visit the @lbjlibrary! Or just go buy a bunch of stuff from their store online!
We truly live in the dumbest country on the planet.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Other than Robert Kaplan's Balkan Ghosts and a few biographies of Tito, I haven't read a ton of history about the Balkans, the former Yugoslavia, or its breakup in the Yugoslav Wars of Independence in the 1990s. But I recently picked up Julian Borger's 2016 book, The Butcher's Trail: How the Search for Balkan War Criminals Became the World's Most Successful Manhunt (BOOK | KINDLE | AUDIO), and I haven't put it down yet.
It's riveting! And shows what international allies can do (or were able to do at one point in the past three decades) to bring justice to horrific war criminals once leaders actually gain the courage to act.
Some of the operations to capture the suspected war criminals are wild, too. The first indicted war criminal ever captured by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), Slavko Dokmanović, was a former Serbian mayor accused of massacring hundreds of Croatian prisoners. The team charged with arresting him was lead by an American attorney, a British detective from Shakespeare's hometown of Stratford-on-Avon, and a Czech homicide detective. The tactical unit that planned and executed the arrest of Dokmanović were actually elite Polish commandos who staged a car accident and smoothly rushed the vehicle to seize Dokmanović.
There's actually video of it! The first capture of an indicted war criminal in the former Yugoslavia:
Later on, American Navy SEALs and British SAS were also used to capture Balkan war criminals and they'd disable a vehicle with an electromagnetic pulse and then use a sledgehammer to smash the windows and pull the suspect out of the car, simply shooting bodyguards if they tried to resist.
Imagine being so starved for attention (despite already being the most famous/infamous person in the world) that you refuse to cede the stage to the World Cup champions during the trophy presentation even though this EXACT same thing happened last year at the Club World Cup final. I wonder how many White House employees won money with inside information by betting that the President would refuse to leave the stage when the trophy was raised. The only thing that Trump didn't think belonged to him was the chorus of boos from the stadium full of people when he made he made an appearance -- I'm sure he thought those were for Spain or Argentina.
I can't even be shocked by how big of an embarrassing asshole our President is because I'd only have been surprised if this cringeworthy shit hadn't happened. We already know what kind of person he is. Donald Trump never threw a birthday party for his kids where he didn't also get to unwrap a gift.