
seen from China
seen from Canada
seen from Austria

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from China
seen from China
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Finland

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
There is only evolution.
Medieval animals really were that fucked up they just evolved without us realizing

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Why The Bible Part 2 evolution
Why The Bible Part 2Â evolution
I felt it was necessary to write about evolution and science separately this is part two in my series of why I chose the Bible. If you want part one go here http://justbeyondthebend.com/why-the-bible/. I wanted to address this because there are some out there who feel as though Christians reject science. There are some who would feel as though I am uneducated or weak minded and am unable to thinkâŠ
View On WordPress
I've never understood how someone could read the Bible (especially the creation account) and come away with "God used evolution to create the world." It says how He did it and that it took 6 days! How do you get theistic evolution from that?
Lots of people try to reinterpret the original word translated as âdayâ to mean something longer than a 24 hour period, calling it a more poetic translation which allows for a longer amount of time to pass and therefore claiming God used evolution to create the world.
This comes mostly from the fact that children in schools are taught one form of science growing up: evolution. Although macro evolution has never been conclusively proven, it is not taught as a theory but as scientific fact.
Kids who grow up in church are shown from a young age this disconnect between science and faith and just accept it. Faith is for the spiritual aspects of life, science explains the practical, and evolution is the true science. Kids who are raised outside of church and come to faith later on also already have preconceived notions about the beginning of the world and many donât ever stop to question it. Theyâve been pretty much brainwashed to believing the religion of evolution and since itâs been taught to them by the education system for years and years, they have no reason to question. Most Christian parents will tell their children âoh we donât believe in evolution because the Bible says God createdâ but the conversation doesnât go further, and it needs to. Let your family and your friends know that this is not a blind faith, but a faith by which all other things can be explained.
What we need to be able to teach our children is that there is no disconnect between science and God.
Could God have used macro evolution to create the universe? I mean, heâs God, so arguably yes. Did he? No.
It doesnât line up with any provable science
it does not line up with his revealed word
it doesnât match up with the doctrine of Original Sin - how eons of death and decay could occur before sin entered the picture
it forces you to have to explain how/why God decided Adam and Eve were sufficiently developed to be considered the first man and woman
it attacks the truth of God saying we are made in His image
it is a belief system completely based on random chance instead of divine ordination
it reinforces a wrong belief that the Bible is filled with just âreally good moral storiesâ instead of the historical account of Godâs working with humanity.
If you doubt the creation accountâs truthfulness or reliability it calls into question the entire foundation of your faith. But thereâs no reason to doubt. Science through a creation worldview makes sense. What we see in the natural world is entropy and things continuing to fall apart as a result of the Fall, not evolution as things supposedly continue to get better and more complex.
But God and science are not at odds. You donât have to try to fit God into a box of evolution where He doesnât belong. He created science and the laws of nature, and in the creation event they are not contradicted as evolution consistently contradicts other known and proven scientific laws.
Who are we going to believe? Man, who, as Christians, we believe is fallen and fallible? Or the one who made us, who has never failed?
The trouble always comes when we put more faith in the words and mind of man than we do in the Creator who formed, quickened, and purposed man.
Evolution Destroyed in 3 minutes
In the video above, a Christian Brother tries his best to refute evolution, I guess after a heated exchange with an atheist online. This video has gone viral. Many Christians are declaring, âYeah he told them!â Except he didnât.
He gets a lot wrong. So have I in the past and certainly in the future. (Heck maybe in this blog but I donât think so.) As disciples of Christ, we are supposed to be getting better together. I share some corrections below not to âdog" my brother, but to prevent my friends from quoting or reposting this well-intended but flawed video.
New readers should understand my worldview.
My beliefs are as follows:
- I believe the Scriptures are infallible.
- I donât believe in the macro-evolution of humans from a lower life form.
- I believe that Jesus is both Christ and God in the flesh.
So these corrections are not coming from a âhater.â I make these corrections because I care about how we, the Body of Christ present ourselves. In particular, I am concerned with our college students.
1). Assertion: Evolution is not observable and therefore not science.
Answers:
A). Science has observed the Atlantic tomcod develop a resistance to lethal PCBâs.
Here is the research:
Wirgin, I., Roy, N. K., Loftus, M., Chambers, R. C., Franks, D. G., and Hahn, M. E. (2011). Mechanistic basis of resistance to PCBs in Atlantic tomcod from the Hudson River. Sciencexpress.
B). In addition, many fields of science do not observe the actual event.
Example: Astrologers donât have stars under their laboratory coats.
2). Assertion: Evolution is just a theory.
Answer: If you are witnessing to someone who has a S.T.E.M. degree, and you say evolution is just a theory, you MIGHT look like an idiot. The term âTheoryâ in the scientific community means a well thought out and well tested explanation for an event or phenomena. In the scientific community, a theory is past the âHunchâ phase.
3). Assertion: Evolution conflicts with the Second law of thermodynamics. Order can not come from chaos.
Answer: His assertion is true within a closed system. The universe as a whole is getting colder, and it is decaying. The Earth as an example is not a closed system, it is constantly receiving energy from the sun. Therefore, order can increase on the Earth.
4). Assertion: The brother says toward the end, âYou believe in the Big Bang, but my bible says âLet there beâ! (Paraphrase)
Answer: The vast preponderance of Christians with backgrounds in cosmology and astrophysics believe:
A). The Big Bang Theory is settled science.
B). The cosmology of the Christian Scriptures aligns with Big Bang cosmology.
If interested in learning more about these topics, please check out Dr Stephen Myers book âDarwinâs Doubtâ or the ministry of Dr Hugh Ross at Reasons.org. (Books by both gentlemen can be found to the right.).
Contest Rules: