Hey everyone, Abby here! This is something Iâve been exploring for a while now, but Iâve decided to start offering proofreading and line-editing commissions! To clarify, hereâs the difference between proofreading and line-editing:
Proofreading is going through each sentence and making sure that itâs linguistically sound in terms of grammar and spelling.
Line-editing is an examination of syntax and rhythm, and while proofreading can be considered a large part, line-editingâs focus is on the type of language used to make sentences stronger.
Check below the cut for my portfolio and pricing:
My Portfolio
To Light a Match
Blizzard Blue
Fade
Pricing - limit of 20 pages at a time
Proofreading - $.50 per page
Line-editing - $.75 per page
I take all payments through PayPal.
If youâre interested or have any questions, please donât hesitate to DM me!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
How Line Editing Can Make Your Story Stronger -- From a Line Editor
Hi everyone! If you follow this blog and read our book reviews then you know a lot of times one of our big complaints is the story could use a better editor. We donât often state what kind of editing is needed (unless itâs a proofreader/copy editor), but a lot of the time whatâs needed is a line edit.
So what is a line edit?
A line edit is where an editor (or an author if they arenât too close to the writing) goes through the text with a fine tooth comb looking for things that bog the text down. Things like repetitive phrasing, weak verbs/words, similar sentence structure. Line edits look for overused words, cliches, and telling vs. showing.
A line edit is not a content edit. It is not a developmental edit. It is not a sensitivity edit. Itâs not a proofread/copy edit.
Its purpose is to make your prose stronger. More interesting. While leaving the core plots, words, and ideas.
So how does it work?
Well... Iâm going to show you using a U.S.A. Today Bestselling authorâs opening 300 words. This is not my writing. I am using a very small sample as an example for educational purposes.Â
Now that the fair use jargon is out of the way. Here we go.
----
I happened across this while trying to find something to read. I didnât like the opening, and I couldnât figure out why. So I took off my readerâs hat, put on my editorâs hat, fired up google docs, and got to work.
When I was done, I had a document that looked something like this:
Letâs break this down. (You also get to see my fandom name, which I am very open about so if you like reading Hunger Games AUs or Soulmates stuff or a diary fic where Tom Riddle gives Ginny Weasley the facts of life you can hunt me down!)
First Paragraph:
The opening starts in the wrong place and doesnât flow smoothly. And I noticed pretty early on that this author (assuming it isnât a ghostwriter which is possible considering the authorâs release schedule of 10+ books a year) has very repetitive phrasing.Â
Now onto the second paragraph of my edit.
One of the first things I noticed were the weak verbs. The repeated âWalkâ permutations. And, of course, the similar sentence structure. I also wanted to break it up. Add some drama. Heighten the tension. And you can do that with short paragraphs and even one sentence paragraphs. Here are my edits and rationales.
All of that I parsed from the original first paragraph. The words are still mostly Croixâs (or her ghostwriterâs), I just moved a few around, tightened a few verbs, and got rid of what looked like unintentional repetition.
Now weâre onto the original second paragraph which has a lot going on with it. Like the original first paragraph, the second needs a lot of work to make it flow nicely. (It also needed a proofreader, but weâll get to that.)
It may not look like I changed much, but I what I did change mattered.
the last two edits are technically a sensitivity edit, but itâs a very minor one. Itâs more about making Harper a little more real.
The last tells me this wasnât proofread. Thereâs more wrong tenses in this.
And thereâs two more grammar errors and another mistake that tells me that the person writing this wasnât British and didnât use a Brit-picker. When editing, any editor worth their salt will ask you what vernacular youâre going for. While technically not part of a line edit, most line editors will point this kind of thing out. And this is where I get annoyed -- if fanfic authors (particularly in the Harry Potter fandom) who write for fun are expected to have Brit-pickers (and vice versa) the same should be expected for published works. *gets off the soapbox*
On to the why I stopped for a grammar lesson about commas... Basically if there is only one of something be it a book, a brother, or a fiancee as is the case here, commas need to be used to set them off because it is considered non-essential information. Thereâs a really good guide HERE that explains why - just jump to rule 6.
Continuing with this paragraph.
I want to point out, the way this author did the flashback wasnât bad. It just needed to be set off more and put in the right tense. People do have flashbacks. This is how you do them.
To finish up we have this.
Thatâs the first 300 words of J.H. Croixâs Big Win.
So what does the finished line edit look like?
I think itâs tighter. More dramatic and a better hook. The words are still mostly Croixâs (or her ghostwriter, Iâm not judging) but theyâre now stronger. I took out the unintentional repetition. I hit a few grammar problem spots (right now this book would be heading toward losing a star for the grammar errors alone).
It may look like I rewrote the thing, but I didnât. I used what was there. These arenât my words. Sure I added a sentence here and there, but mostly for clarification or to combine two clunky sentences into one.
Also with line edits, most of the suggestions are just that -- suggestions. Itâs an opinion. If the author decided that they liked the wall of text and subject-verb-direct object sentence structure, then thatâs okay. They donât have to take the changes. However, what is important is that the author looks at them. Thinks about them. In many cases a line edit can help pinpoint what I call âcrutches.â Every writer, EVERY SINGLE WRITER, has a go-to sentence structure. Every single writer has a favorite rule they like to break. Every single writer has words they default to or use as filler. And most writers donât have the distance to see these things.
Thatâs why you need a line editor. Itâs a huge eye-opener. Even I, a line editor, still get line edits done for my work.
Also a few final notes: youâll notice I did some proofreading and sensitivity editing in my line edit. Thatâs because I tend to see them as going hand-in-hand. They donât always, and it can vary from editor to editor. Line editing is also more in-depth than proofreading for most editors so will take longer. A good rule of thumb is that a professional editor can edit approximately 5-9 pages an hour for copy editing or 1500 words/hour. Content editing tends to be 1-5 pages an hour or about 750 words/hour. This will also vary from editor to editor. Hereâs a good guide... no matter what do not expect someone to be able to turn around 50,000 word manuscript in a week that may be approximately 34 hours of work, but most editors have other jobs, other clients, and may need to pause to research something... especially if your editor is fact-checking for rooting out anachronisms (which we do in the line edit phase).
No matter what, you should always have another set of eyes do one last proofread/copy edit after you do a line edit. And it shouldnât be your line editor. Theyâre too close to the text, and itâs not their job to go that granular.
I hope that helps!Â
If you like more posts like this, consider buying us a coffee. If you want to look into hiring us to edit your work, you can visit our website.
Later!
--Lark/FanficAllergy/One Half of Christina Rose Andrews
Weâve just finished our third... or is it fourth draft. During this readthrough, we discovered multiple words we tend to overuse - and, to make it worse, when we toss one, we often replace it with another!
Obviously, as authors weâre going to have word repetition when weâre writing, and thatâs okay.  The first draft is only a draft, not the finished product. First drafts are not publication ready. One thing weâve noticed is that while our dialogue is strong, our linking actions are not. All authors have their crutches, but sometimes those writing tics are repetitive and unnecessary.Â
On top of that, we ourselves have certain verbal/physical tics. Â Our characters may or may not have the same ones as we do - and we definitely donât want every character to have exactly the same tics! Â So those are also things weâre looking out for.
So we thought weâd share the list of words weâre trying to watch out for and why weâre looking for them. The list entered life with of only a few words on it and has grown to be about a page long.
Words to watch out for
(assume weâre looking for multiple tenses of all words):
Very/Really/Pretty - These are weak. Most of these you can just cut or replace with a stronger verb.
See/Hear - In the context of our POV character seeing or hearing someone doing something - weâre trying to just show the actions instead of filtering them.
Feel/Think - Filtering words. Just have the character do the action.
Seem - Filtering word, especially in the context of our POV character watching others. Â (Yes, weâre not getting other peopleâs POVs, but we need to watch out for our main character thinking that someone seems to notice or seems to understand or seems to feel.)
Look/Glance - Fall back phrase/words. (When we canât figure out an action for someone, we tend to have them look at or glance at someone.)  Also, look can be filtering - it looks like someone else understands, for example.
Just - Unnecessary word, especially in exposition. People use it in dialogue all the time. Unfortunately it can slip out of dialogue with ease. The trick is to read out loud both with and without the word. Also be aware of characterization. Some people will use the word as a verbal pause while others avoid it.
Realize/Note/Notice - Filtering words. Just show the action.
Well - Verbal tic from both of us. In Real Life, we tend to start our sentences with âwell,â - itâs fine for some characters, not all.
Actually - Weak word. Most can be cut.
Towards/downwards/forwards/upwards/backwards - the proper spelling of these is without the âSâ. Most can be changed to to/down/up/back and remove the âwardâ entirely.
Fuck/Shit/Damn - Wwearing has its place. Itâs important to not alienate readers with an overabundance. Leave it to dialogue if possible.
Start - Weak verb.  âStarts toâ is a common crutch. Just show the action.
Fact - Verbal tic, especially âthe fact thatâ - cut.
Back - Not always necessary, cut where possible.
Take - Weak verb, find stronger ones and cut others.
Sigh/Shrug/Breath - Fall back action. Find something else. Watch out for an overuse of sighing, deep breaths.
Nod/Shake - Bobblehead syndrome. A few instances are fine but there are other ways to show agreement/disagreement.  Especially unnecessary if a character shakes her head and then immediately says ânoâ. As a note, if you use nod you do not need to have the words âmy headâ, âher headâ, âhis headâ, etc. Itâs unnecessary. Itâs assumed when nodding itâs the head unless otherwise specified.Â
Clearly - Filler word - omit.
Make - Weak verb - try to find stronger.
Lean - Overused action.
Roll (rolling eyes) - I read a story where a character rolled their eyes every other piece of dialogue; not only was it repetitive, but I started getting concerned about eyestrain. Itâs an overused action used to show annoyance, disbelief, or disrespect.
Grin/Smile/Smiling - Overused actions. People smile all the time in real life to put others at ease, however in writing it gets repetitive. Find other action tags.Â
That - Unnecessary word, omit where possible. Read the sentence aloud both with and without the word. Many times it can be cut. Also âthatâ can often be switched out with âwhichâ and âitâ.
As weâre sure you can tell, these are not words/actions we can toss wholesale. Sometimes your character needs to take a deep breath or glance up at someone.  People nod all the time.  Very can be a useful descriptive word, especially in dialogue.  Thereâs no way in hell anyone can ever toss the word âthatâ completely.
However as authors, we must be aware of our overused words and phrases and take steps to make sure they havenât taken over our writing.Â
What words are problematic for you? Â Do you have words/actions you tend to overuse? Â