I don't understand WHY Bardugo wrote Alina's ending the way she did. Did she think it would make for a bittersweet, satisfactory ending? (It did not.) Did she think it would be sharp and realistic? (It unfortunately was a bit.) Did she think she'd be subverting expectations?? Did she love Mal so much she went insane?? I just don't get it. I just don't get it. If by the end of the series she forgot to add in more love interest for Alina (because she obviously didn't want to consider the other two despite being fascinated with Aleksander) she could just have. Let poor Alina be alone. Why condemn her to such a fate? I think everyone I've talked about this has unanimously agreed they'd cease to exist if they were in her place. It's so. So strange
Itās all a consequence of the underlying conservatism and misogyny of the series. This is best illustrated through the fact that even in Alinaās āhappily ever afterā she is still regarded as a weird outsider while Mal is beloved by their new community. It isolates Alina in a way that the Darkling never could, itās representative of Alinaās permanent dependence on Mal as a consequence of their marriage. Mal is allowed to have a life outside of his marriage, while Alina has to depend on him for emotional connection. She can only find fulfillment in her husband while Mal is afforded the freedom (and means) to seek fulfillment from other places.
What I imagine Bardugo thought, was that it would be heartwarming and pleasant for the āboy and the girlā to return to simplicity and live happily ever after. Hence the line: āThey had an ordinary life, full of ordinary thingsāif love can ever be called that.ā In isolation, itās certainly a sweet sentiment that one might smile at in a different story. However, in this story, itās a clear attempt to romanticize the dire (and downright depressing) circumstances of Alinaās so-called āhappily ever afterā. It looks like a happily ever after, but readers with a critical eye can see it for what it truly is. They are able to see the way Alina is disempowered at nearly every level, that she had been relegated to this role because she dared to want more out of life.
This gestures towards the fundamental reason why Malina is far more disturbing than the likes of Darklina. Itās disturbing because it reflects the ways women are pushed to settle down and sacrifice themselves for their man and glorifies that sacrifice as the healthy alternative to āgreedā. Sure, the Darkling is villainous, but his actions are so beyond the normal scope of everyday relationships that they fail to land the same impact as Malās mundane assholery. Alina is considered greedy for wanting to excercise her power and influence for a noble cause, but somehow Mal isnāt greedy for wanting Alinaās full undivided attention despite her many other responsibilities? The narrative validates his unreasonable requests by presenting the ending as something wholesome and heartwarming. Malās selfishness and greed is validated by the text because it is societally acceptable and encouraged men to have those traits. He has to be the more powerful one in the relationship for this traditional happy ending to work.
Bardugo condemned Alina to a depressing fate because she was so fixated on the image of a fairy tale happily ever after that she ignored how Alina would be impacted by it. I think this reveals Bardugoās strange affection for Mal, but it also shows how she failed to see how the realistic mundanity of Malina would not work in her favour. Becauseā¦yeah itās realistic all right, realistically misogynistic that is.