#is silly

So, let me get this straight. Transmisogyny, as a term, describes the intersection of misogyny and transphobia. Trans people who were AFAB experience both misogyny and transphobia, so they also experience transmisogyny then, right? No? They're "transmisogyny exempt" and benefit from it? Oh! Transmisogyny is just the word for the unique form of oppression that transfems face? Okay, so transmascs have made their own word for the unique form of oppression they face, they're calling it transandrophobia. What do you mean that's bad? "Transandrophobia doesn't exist because androphobia doesn't exist"? But we've already established that this is just the word that transmascs are using to describe their unique form of oppression, just like transmisogyny. "Transmisogyny describes the intersection of transphobia and misogyny"? ...I feel like we're going around in circles here.

I actually think it'd be rlly funny if Pomni focused on Gumigoo a lot during the adventures and just rlly wants her friend back and Ragatha thinks its Pomni being in love with Gumigoo and gets jealous, so Ragatha thinks she's in a love triangle, Pomni's sad about her friend not knowing who she is and Gumigoo doesn't know that any of this is even happening.

i think at least some of the semantic discourse about 'non-sexual kink' stems from a difference between viewing 'kink' as referring to an umbrella of predetermined activities assumed to have a sexual element by default, or as as a looser signifier that can be applied to any activity as long as it has a sexual element