Really interesting pair of posts:
Georgette Heyer, on the other hand, was much more interested in peers, especially in her Regency novels. 43% of Heyer books have duke, marquess, or earl (or their issue) as heroes; and if you consider all peerage ranks (down to baron), 68% of Heyerâs heroes are peers or their issue. According to Laura Vivanco, the bestselling authors who shaped the modern standard of Regencyâincluding Stephanie Laurens, Mary Balogh, and Mary Jo Putneyâcite Heyer as their inspiration. Everyone claims to love Austen still, but do we love a Heyer-istic or chronotope remake of what we expect Austen to be, possibly based on our film and television adaptations of her work?
...
Letâs stop talking about syphilis. Letâs be historically selective for the purposes of a happily-ever-after, character-driven story: this is âescapism.â One blogger called this chronotope a âNever-Neverland mash-up thatâs been dubbed âThe Recencyâ or âAlmackistan.ââ I have also heard it called a âwallpaper historical,â a âcostume drama,â or a âDisney Regency.â It is a cleaner, safer, prettier, better-smelling, and happier world than the real Regency ever was.
...
And do not be fooled: people are getting their history from the genre. Bobbi Dumas wrote an article for NPR entitled âDonât Know Much About History? Read A Romance.â She quoted Sabrina Jeffries as saying, âEverything I know about the personal cost of Waterloo, I learned from Regency-set historical romances.â Dumas also claimed that âGeorgette Heyer wrote such a fine treatment of [Waterloo] in An Infamous Army that it ended up on a reading list for students at Sandhurst, the British military academy.â African American author Beverly Jenkins calls her books âedutainment: entertainment and education,â which may be the most accurate way of putting it. âThereâs no test on Friday,â she says, âso [the readers just] drink up the history. They just inhale it.â















