now might be a good time to direct people to hatnote, the ambient music player that makes sounds based off of Wikipedia edits. absolutely popping off in the past hour
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from Canada

seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Belgium
seen from China

seen from Canada
now might be a good time to direct people to hatnote, the ambient music player that makes sounds based off of Wikipedia edits. absolutely popping off in the past hour

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
For all you top.hatnote.com readers out there, we just added some shortcuts to do a web search (🔍) and news search (🗞️) for each article. Hope this saves you a click or two!
Ok guys, if you’re the type that focuses better with background noise, but full-on music is too distracting, I’ve found the website for you
It’s listen.hatnote.com, which makes music out of real-time wikipedia edits. There’s different tones for whether info was added or removed, and when a new user is registered.
It’s mostly soft strings and bells, so it’s calming. And since there’s no lyrics or even pattern to it, you can’t get distracted trying to mentally follow along to it. Just pure, unobtrusive background noise
I’d recommend having it play on a different tab though, since there are visuals to the sounds and that can distract you. And a bonus: if you truly do want to fuck around for a while, it’s really fun to watch what’s getting edited, and it’ll even link to that article so you can go read about it
Enjoy!
If you ever need some random and pleasant background noise, might I suggest listening to the sounds of wikipedia being edited?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I have eaten nothing but pizza and donuts for the last 55 hours. I live in a pixely video game and am trying to refill my health bar.
Unlocking the human potential of Wikidata
Wikidata is amazing. Thanks to the amazing Wikidata evangelists out there, I feel confident that, given at least five minutes, I can convince anyone that Wikidata offers a critical service necessary for Wikipedia, other wiki projects, and generally the future of knowledge. Challengers welcome. :)
But Wikidata has a problem. Right now it's optimized to ingest and grow. We've written about how it's not ideal for maintenance of the datasets, but automated ingestion of datasets is what Wikidata does best.
All this automated growth doesn't necessarily connect well with the organic growth of Wikipedia and other projects. And we can see that Wikidata hasn't truly captured the positive attentions of existing editor communities.
For that human touch Wikidata needs ever so much, it must reach out to the projects that gave rise to it.
One idea for doing this would be to make human editing of Wikidata easier. Make editing Wikidata as easy as adding a citation to Wikipedia. Literally.
Highlight a statement, click a button like "Structure this statement" and grow Wikidata, all without leaving your home wiki.
What it might look like to edit Wikidata from Wikipedia.
While Wikitext will always have its place for me, I've quite warmed up to the visual editor, and prefer its interface for adding citations. While it's only an idea for an experiment at the moment, how might an inline Wikidata editor following the same pattern could be change the game for Wikidata?
A lot of data is already citing back to home wikis, but a powerful enough editor could pull the citation on a statement through to the Wikidata entry, along with the import source.
So much data is already coming from Wikipedia, but humans can do even better.
I have always thought it would be great to see Wikidata's support for multi-valued properties leveraged more fully. A language-agnostic knowledgebase will be a new space to compare and resolve facts. A meeting of the many minds across different languages of Wikipedia could spell better information for all.
An advanced enough system could encourage contributions on the basis of coverage, highlighting cited statements which have not yet been structured.
And of course, at the very least, we speed up building an intermediary representation of knowledge, not tied to a specific language. People sharing knowledge across wikis, helping to further bootstrap a Wikidata community with close ties to its older siblings.