#dc comics#batman#bruce wayne#dc#dick grayson#dc universe#tim drake#batfamily#batfam#dc fanart
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from New Zealand
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from Australia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from TĆ¼rkiye
seen from Russia
seen from Canada
seen from Albania
Cos Edward eating sandich under a bench. Growing stronger
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ā¢ No registration required ā¢ HD streaming
LoC Training VideoĀ 17 Video 17 explains each Hero Ability you can gain in League of Confessors.
Gaining Abilities
Your hero can gain an ability by:
Constructing a building (castle, church, or armory) by using the Build ability.
Moving into an unclaimed territory (where no friendly or opposing soldier is present).
Performing a successful attack (at least 1 enemy unit is defeated) by using of the Battle ability.
Performing a successful defenseā¦
View On WordPress
If I have a creature with Lignify on it and a +1/+1 counter, and an Abzan Falconer, does my creature have flying? It seems like a timestamp issue, but I'm confused if the time the counter was added makes a difference too.
Counters donāt have timestamps. When the counter was added doesnāt matter at all here.
The only thing that matters here is whether Abzan Falconer has been on the battlefield longer than Lignify or vice versa. Whichever is the newer permanent wins here.
If Abzan Falconer has the more recent timestamp, then the Lignified creature gains flying after Lignify removes its abilities.
If Lignify has the more recent timestamp, the Lignified creature gains flying from Abzan Falconer before Lignify removes its abilities, including the Falconer-granted flying.
Maro recently answered a question about past attempts to make unblockable a keyword, and then mention that they changed it to "cannot be blocked" to make people stop thinking it was a keyword. Does an ability being a keyword have an mechanical significance (outside of things like flying that need to be keyworded)?
Yes.
The biggest interaction is with cards that remove abilities after effects are applied to creatures. When a card gains a keyword, it actually gains an ability, whereas something likeĀ ācanāt be blocked this turnā actually changes the game rules while the effect is active.
For example, I target Elvish Visionary with both Slip Through Space and Coat with Venom, let them both resolve, then target it with Gift of Tusks. Elvish Visionary wonāt have deathtouch, but it still wonāt be able to be blocked sinceĀ ācanāt be blockedā is just something thatās true about it this turn rather than an ability that was actually given to the card.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ā¢ No registration required ā¢ HD streaming
In regards to the interaction between Seeker of the Way and Gift of Tusks...why would Seeker lose lifelink? Doesn't gaining lifelink until end of turn work like +N/+N effects? What if a different spell gave the Seeker trample or first strike?
Gaining and losing abilities is purely handled in timestamp order. You apply the effects in the order they happened.Ā
So first Seeker gains lifelink from its triggered ability, then it loses it when Gift of Tusks resolves. If Seeker was then equipped with Loxodon Warhammer, it would have lifelink and trample since equipment gets a new timestamp when it becomes attached to a creature.
If I have a creature on the battlefield that has the static ability that provides to it all activated abilities of all creature cards in graveyards, and someone has a Vampire Hexmage (or similarly worded activated ability) in their yard, does my creature have "Sacrifice Vampire Hexmage: [do a thing]" or "Sacrifice [this ceature]: ..."?
When a creature gains an ability from another card, any self-referential mentions of that card are changed to the name of the card that now has the ability.
Being dependent on vs being limited by
This isn't quite the right concept but... these things are different:
being dependent on something
being unpleasantly or destructively limited by something
Being dependent on something can be really good. It can make things possible that weren't before it. We're all dependent on technology in one way or another (for instance, heating and air conditioning. Shoes. Large-scale agriculture.).
Sometimes people object to dependence because they think it will impose an unpleasant limitation. Even when it would actually make more things possible.Ā
Like, someone thinks they (or someone in their care) shouldn't use a wheelchair because then they'll only be able to go where a wheelchair can go. They won't be able to use stairs and such anymore. And sometimes this is true.
But often, this can mean that someone can only go as far as they can walk, and can only stay out for as long as they can stand. So they have trouble leaving the house, or going places for long periods of time. And are much more limited than they otherwise would be. Dependence isn't bad, if it makes you able to do more things.Ā
AAC can be like this, too. Verbal speech is more flexible, in principle, all things being equal. But all things aren't equal, even for people who have some verbal speech. The important thing is for someone to have as much communication as possible. For people who get more communication from relying on things other than speech, dependence isn't a bad thing. It's good. It makes life better.
Getting more ability to do stuff you care about should be the goal. Not a particular way of doing it. Not judged against a theoretical ideal. Judged against what actually works best for you (or your child).
