OBJECT REMARKS (DOMESTIC TEST)
A small side avenue branching from SUBSTRATE.HOST.
Same underlying structure: object ā tap ā response boundary ā contact ā output
But redirected into something quieter, more domestic, and deliberately less doctrinal.
Object Remarks are NFC-linked labels for ordinary things.
Peel, place, tap. Receive one line.
Not a conversation. Just a remark.
Each object carries a different temperament:
kettle: dutiful, mildly burdened, aware of ritual
fridge: procedural, withholding, faintly judgemental
mirror: direct, observant, occasionally tired
door: (in progress ā threshold logic still unresolved)
Phrase banks sit behind each object (ā20 lines to start), served one at a time, rotating across visits.
The physical layer remains fixed. The digital layer expands.
The aim isnāt to simulate intelligence.
Itās to formalise something that already happens:
the quiet anthropomorphisation of household objects, the sense that things are already āhalf-speakingā through repetition, use, and proximity.
This just makes the remark explicit.
Built the core structure overnight:
NFC endpoints live
object routes resolving to single-line outputs
initial phrase banks in place
tone/temperament guides per object
first tags assigned and fixed to actual objects for testing
First line is stable. Subsequent taps pull from the bank.
Next step is weighting, variation, and light contextual drift ā so responses feel less random and more āin tuneā with the objectās role.
It sits adjacent to SUBSTRATE:
less about inaccessible interiors, more about familiar surfaces behaving slightly differently.
Still boundary-driven. Justā¦ domestic.
