#ebtc

➤ Echo Protocol's Monad deployment was exploited for $76 million due to a compromised admin key, leading to unauthorized eBTC minting. ➤ The attacker laundered a portion of the funds through Tornado Cash, while Echo Protocol has since regained control of its keys and burnt the remaining unauthorized eBTC. ➤ The incident highlights the risks associated with centralized off-chain components in DeFi, prompting Echo Protocol to pause cross-chain functionality and enhance security measures.

➤ Echo Protocol, a DeFi platform on the Monad blockchain, lost $76.7 million in synthetic Bitcoin (eBTC) due to an admin key compromise, not a smart contract flaw. ➤ The attacker minted unauthorized eBTC, laundered funds through Curvance and Tornado Cash, and still holds a significant amount of the stolen assets. ➤ This incident highlights ongoing DeFi vulnerabilities in 2026, emphasizing the critical need for robust operational security measures like multi-signature protection and minting limits.

➤ Echo Protocol suffered a $76M exploit due to an admin key compromise, allowing unauthorized minting of eBTC. ➤ The attacker used the unbacked eBTC to borrow assets, bridge them across networks, and launder them through privacy tools like Tornado Cash. ➤ The exploit led to a sharp plunge in the ECHO token price, DeFi panic, and the protocol halting operations for an investigation.

➤ Echo Protocol has paused cross-chain activity after an attacker minted approximately $76.7 million in unauthorized eBTC on its Monad deployment. ➤ The attacker used the fake eBTC as collateral on Curvance to borrow real Bitcoin-backed assets before routing funds through Tornado Cash, with an estimated $816,000 in actual value stolen. ➤ The incident is suspected to be due to a compromised admin private key, highlighting risks associated with newly launched lending markets and single-signature admin roles.

➤ Echo Protocol experienced an exploit where an attacker minted 1,000 unauthorized eBTC tokens on its Monad deployment, valued at approximately $76.7 million. ➤ The attack was attributed to compromised admin credentials and weak access controls, allowing the attacker to gain minting privileges rather than a smart contract flaw. ➤ While the paper value of the exploit was high, realized losses were significantly lower due to limited liquidity on Monad, preventing the attacker from liquidating most of the minted tokens.