#disablement

They were networking a mental hospital chemical into the lives of their victims living in society. He was now regularly experiencing this method of coercive control. They had implemented it to keep people disabled. They were choosing to keep people disabled to prevent their victims gaining accomplishment. The management of the network had incrementally achieved stopping thought through a method of induced chemical application. The formula was used as and when the employers of the method saw a need for disablement to take place. He had decided to share his notes about it when he realised he was becoming retarded through continued exposure to their system. He didn't know how much time he had left as an able bodied man and wanted people to know. He had recently thought of the word vagina. Thinking it had caused his guards to begin their now usual practice of retardation. The severity of this particular incident compelled him to share his experience with whoever would read about it. He hoped his readers weren't all employed by the same regime. He feared the function of such a society gaining complete control, of surroundings, of our ability to feel, of our ability for love, of the entirety of creative thought. He feared what they did and knew his life was the evidence of what their hatred made manifest.

Development Across a Lifespan

Did Cronus eat his own child?

Yes, he did - multiple children in fact. In Greek mythology, Kronos, the leader of the Titans, swallowed each of his children at birth. Why? Because he was terrified of a prophecy that one of them would overthrow him - as he had overthrown his own father, Uranus.

Good old omphalos Dressed in swaddling clothes You helped give birth To what is earth-born

* * *

The Saturn story is the same as the Kronos story.

* * *

These are habit energies And must be acknowledged to find resolve With mindful understanding we achieve this

* * * Are habit energies considered a Buddhist conception?

He hadn’t known they had moved him to the address he was now at to physically disable him. If he had been permitted to realise they had planned to have his spinal column crushed he would have never agreed to live here. The acceptance of its disablement into his living was instant. If transparency had been involved in the initial negotiation would his life still be physically able? He believed so. His now having to appreciate this unavoidable acceptance of disablement was a fate he hadn't planned on the welcome of. He would attempt cycling again even although he knew it would be short lived. Jogging and running were off the cards. His greatest source of exercise was now going to and from the supermarket for replenishments with the aid of a walking stick. It wasn't enough. He needed 300 to 500 calories of exercise each day. A man of his age a temperament was expected to be capable of this amount. A once a day shopping trip was only 100 there and back and it wasn't enough. He would need to renegotiate and redress his activities. He would discover a new way of maintaining his health now that his physical good health had been prematurely taken from him. He would survive and he would adapt to this alternative mode of living.

The one thing he was absolutely certain of was that their system of tethering biological matter, matter that they then gathered round to feed from, was funded and managed to create pockets of sustenance for a visiting organic type.

to disable peaceful processes of creativity is to disable processes leading towards good health. a few managed economies have a monopolising reliance upon such strategizing. a health service is one of these industrial economies. to hold the effects of good health in disablement encourages a reliance upon those catering for ill health in networked health economies. to further this monopolising with a collaboration between funded health provision and church services equates to the creation of both a spiritual and physical management of good health. it does, when its intended effect is to disable, create an illegal process for a focused upon life to be held by. it maintains a refusing persuasion upon the healthy routes a person can choose for their path of living and it ultimately, if sustained over longer periods of time, leads to family' demises.

such involvements are not peaceful.

such involvements are passive aggression.

Q) are we in the company of puppet making saboteurs?

A) 'the shoe is most certainly on the other boot round these places'

The greed of commerce has blinded you. Those you are focusing upon are becoming disabled because of your focus upon them. You are making social networks and communities bias and disabled. I am saying this to you because I am experiencing my present and future life becoming part of the disablement you assist in creating. Your importance is most certainly based upon disabling society and those you deem as befitting a life within a disabled surrounding. This greed to control others is blinding you.

A good question to ask yourself is: How can I generate - how can I create - the energy of peace, understanding, and love?