When I read, "a truly competent public-school system...does not assess the intellectual potential of lower-class children with evaluation tools created for those whose class conditioning gives them an undeniable advantage over the former"(36) it made me more confident of my thinking about the need to have a community based curriculum that finds its roots in the history and culture of the people for whom I teach. I firmly believe that I can get any student, any class, ready for state mandated tests so long as I can start with what they know and foster that in my classroom. However, it's hard to do that when the pressure of the tests weighs on me through the quad sheet, the meetings, and the need for a cannon. Granted, I believe in the cannon and also believe the cannon is flexible. However, it's hard to pull kids into a democratic and actualized curriculum when they've been conditioned to answer the test using texts that facilitate the test. I want them to answer the test using texts that they pulled from grandmother, pulled from the stories their uncles told at funerals, collected from their friends in the park.Â
 If the Freire had his way, then there would be a lot more community involvement in the day to day workings of the school. There would be more interviews with parents in terms of curriculum and what students needed to know. Granted, this might fly in the face of tests and what have you, but it would be real and it would come from the parents, the community, and from the source of our constituents. The things they learned would be directly related to who they are and where they are in time and place, and not necessarily in the time and place of the government that was generalizing knowledge and content.Â