meta
can't really argue with them on-site because i'm too petty + can't really get my thoughts in an unemotional way but arghhhhhhhhhhhhhh this question is so iffy to me. like...yes...i know i'm a convergent prism. it's not because i don't have the cognitive capacity to make up new thoughts on the fly, but because i literally do not have much crystallized intelligence and any crystallized intelligence that i do have seems to phenomenlogically "erode", thus forcing me to emulate depth with whatever scraps of information are crawling to me at the moment. (OP's flavor of "originality" is translating information from one field onto another field to gain new insight, IIRC.) there's also the fact that i don't have much life experience at all to construct entirely new insight either? lots of my reblogs/retweets are written confirmations of my suspicions/inklings/hunches, with the exception that it's written by someone else















