Jun 19
a true parksborn fan should never speak ill of mj
Loading...
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Chile
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Canada
seen from United States
a true parksborn fan should never speak ill of mj
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
people say that tobey maguire is constantly being a bitch about his characters, wanting certain aspects changed to fit how he views them, and i like how you don't even need someone to tell you that because of how obvious it is sometimes
nick carraway is, despite being judgmental, more inward with his comments, and he's always calm and collected even when some bullshit is happening around him. despite this, we see only in the baz adaptation of gatsby, nick carraway having at least three crashouts. tobey, a very angry person, definitely did NOT influence this whatsoever.
despite the many inaccuracies with tobey's nick, which, I'm sure is not all of his decision, at least he's better than paul rudd's. maybe not better than sam waterston's, but better than paul rudd's.
i'm aware this is an unpopular take, but i like the inclusion of nick becoming an alcoholic after new york within the baz adaptation. yes, he makes it a whole thing wtihin the book about how he doesn't drink with this holier-than-thou attitude, but he is also unreliable and tends to try to twist the story to make himself look better. it also just strengthens the idea of how much gatsby really meant to him and how much new york fucked him up.
besides, that's not the worst thing about the movie, like people like to claim. I think the worst part is not having the proper funeral scene. "yes, let's remove the funeral scene. oh yes, let's also add a scene where catherine—who shows remotely zero interest in nick within the books unlike all adaptations like to portray—drugs and sexually assults nick!"
harry survives n peter feels sick everytime he looks at harry's scars. not because he thinks theyre gross or anything like that, but because he can't handle the guilt
ive been thinking a lot lately abut the parallels in the raimi movies regarding how peter and harry react to grief
especially how peter acts like it's unforgivable for harry to go after him based on a misunderstanding when peter quite literally does the exact same thing. i know that they retconned it in the third movie and revealed the real killer was sandman, but peter still killed a guy based off a misunderstanding based on what he saw
i know this is surface-level analysis but it just makes me sad
i can't draw kissing for the life of me but I think it All Worked Out because i mainly like angst and unrequited relationships Anyway
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I hate it because the 2000s Gatsby adaptation is so fucking awful and overly fast paced but the ending is so gut wrenching. But like... not in the context of this movie. Nick and Gatsby's relationship isn't believable, which I understand is kind of the point, it wasn't really a sincere relationship, Gatsby was just using him, but Nick thought it WAS something, and this adaptation doesn't show that. Nick is shown to dislike or almost genuinely hate Gatsby the entire movie up until the very last scene, whereas in 1974 and 2013 it follows the book more, with Nick's initial skepticism for Gatsby and then eventual desire for a bond and then devastation at his death. If the final scene with Nick throwing the cufflinks into the lake was in the other two adaptations I mentioned earlier, it'd be way more sad.
did the people who say raimi mj was only in love with spider-man rather than peter watch the movie with their eyes closed cuz i'd argue the opposite actually
I really wished they went more in depth with Mary Jane's backstory in the Raimi movies and maybe the sweaty basement dwelling armpit lickers wouldn't hate on her as bad. I can understand disliking her but holy shit at what point is it just blatant misogyny. Even only knowing the context of the movies and ignoring the comics, people are so loud and vitriolic when, once again, in strictly the context of the movie, Peter is way worse. He's a horrible friend and not a good boyfriend. I don't know how she was able to hold it together at the dinner scene because if it were me I would've lost my shit the second I walked in. And people will use the excuse that Peter's going through a lot but then turn around and act like MJ wasn't abused her entire life. No, I don't really love MJ and I don't agree with all of her actions, but people need to calm tf down, and if the damn movie would've treated her as more than a love interest and actually went in depth with her home life I feel as though it would've been better. But then again, it's just misogyny. It doesn't go the furthest in depth for Harry either, not as much as it could, regarding his father's abuse, yet he gets more of a pass than she does (though I do believe he is justified in a lot of his anger, people don't give the same passes to MJ).