the fact that on both Buffy and Angel the idea of “sex” is so intrinsically linked to impurity whilst the idea of “unconsummated love” is held as some kind of ideal …yeah that’s always rubbed me the wrong way. the pattern is that almost every significant or “soulmate” relationship is never allowed to actually consummate through sex DESPITE the active reciprocation and desire of each involved. or if it IS consummated - nuclear level fallout. when Buffy and Angel do it, he LITERALLY turns evil. we are subliminally and overtly hit over the head with the idea that sex = bad or sin. no sex = good and pure. ok great.
aside from the huge elephant in the room that is Angel’s curse and Bangel, Angel and Cordelia can never consummate either due to plot fuckery. she dies before their relationship gets off the ground. same with Wesley and Fred. same with Giles and Jenny. this pattern is starting to get suspicious…
and when we ask ourselves what couple DID we see actually and constantly get it on throughout the show? Spuffy - whose relationship dynamic was intended to symbolise the destruction of Buffy’s psyche. sex becomes an act of shame and a catalyst of ultimate sin. we see this dynamic play out with Wesley and Lilah. people only fuck who they don’t really care about and for self-harming reasons. but when you’re actually in love? it’s off the table, OR there are catastrophic consequences.
I’m sure this has been talked about to death and analysed with infinitely more elegance but i just needed to talk about thissss. weird puritan ideals of the 90s, i guess? and this is not even me necessarily wanting to SEE characters fuck for the sake of it, I just want to know Why it was treated with such taboo.

















