#bs math

Hello!

Prior to studying Accountancy, I am a graduate of an accounting-related degree (BS Accounting Technology). For those graduates of accounting related degrees: Accounting Technology, Management Accounting, Internal Auditing to name a few - there's a bridging program 1-2 years to complete BS Accountancy. You may check out my post regarding this here.

I have no specific knowledge on how a BS Math graduate can pursue Accountancy as a 2nd degree. Maybe the universities/colleges can credit some of your subject. I don't know the extent of what can be credited. I think you can still refer to my old post.

When I was studying Accountancy, I have a classmate who is a Political Science graduate. If my memory serves me right - I believe her 1st year subjects were credited.

1st Dhyana

Is to place An Intermediary

Between What Is Compulsive or Compelling One Towards No-Thought or the Absence Thereof (?)

the first Noble Truth or Noble Wisdom In Long Form                                             Is A. Life is Suffering                                                                                               There is Ignorance in this world however the mode of inference is that what comes of it would be the Absence of it being the matter.                                            We Don’t Know What By Any Means Possible Has Come Upon The Earth Ever Before Our Polluted Environment Was Filthed By These EverConsumingPeoples Of Us & Acquisition Of Energy

“She” Gives Us A Hint As To Where To Go Yet Hasn’t Any Idea As To Why This Polluted Earth Is This Way

The Noosphere                                                                                                       It is Probably A Fact That The Atmosphere Is An Elevated Ring Of A Wanton Side Of An Unoffensive Nature That Holds (as do the ice caps) A hidden sequence of Availability To A Higher Answer. We’d Think That The Polluted Drift Of This Place Is In This Coded Sequence because let’s face it the dirt & grume of our spectacle never goes away 

not only that, the noosphere & any proof that there may be an existent cellular consciousness we’d think was creative or was produced at the same time as the cognitive/creative process or function of the brain as we developed As a race was indicative of a simple Atmosphere that indicates a higher proportion of propensity for an environmental awareness to have been developmental and nigh rejuvenative and ultimate in its effect upon the evolution of the species

not only does the noosphere exist

the noosphere came into existence at a certain Time & Place

So...

A. is Universal Consciousness Possible.

B. Would Any Indication Of (cellular consciousness) be requitable as a feasible hope that cells not only must be divided in order to survive that they indicate a deeper signification on the level of 1) language 2) memory 3) growth                   Is it Possible for this Earth to have remitted any form of conscious cellular memory or application due to the fact that what the Earth Was Expanding Outward would A. become its imminent destruction                                             B. not wish to encompass a. who b. what c. when d. where e. why  f. How ???                 

The Plants On Earth Are Avoiding the answer by becoming What they are           This Means Macro & Micro Biology are more & more necessities & significant     due to the overwhelming difficulty in recreating a similar environment for when such conclusive details & causal conditions would allow for A simple new plant to emerge that was not in its classification                                                             It would denote conditions are not sufficient for new growth                                                                         All classes would be indicative of such A balance into an inharmonious constraint which would not allow itself to be applicable in such conditions

Do not be misdirected into believing that we have no chance to replicate such conditions’ responses or the imitative becoming clarified or its signification dominant                                                                                                                 what we perceive as the ultimate reality in life becomes a great value too important to effectively A. Describe and/or  B. Decry                                                   Descriptive Analysis Leads One To A Further Assumption One We Make As IF Absent-mindedly Which Will Ultimately Aid In Its Value More Than Decrease In Its Adjudication & Assistance

This Is True Health & Its Somatic Tenor 

* A healthy Earth indicates a healthy mind

* A Healthy Environment Indicates A Vast Cultivation Of Proclivities Perhaps Engendering Awareness

* A Healthy Body is the same as its healthy mind

Back 2 it Again (!!!!)      etymology/psychosomatics

in an offhand manner one is always merely asked if they would prefer the            A. sedative or B. Amphetamine                                                                                       nobody has attuned a frequency high enough to be able to naturally attain the symbiosis or chemicals necessary to Avoid This Concept Entirely                              

set the rules into displacement before dysphasia

Negaholism & the sum of our parts Do, in fact, Not A Body make

No trigger has a methodology   or  a clean hospitable world to rely upon             there is no functional apprehension or grace when a trigger or pressure point or cap is allowed or suggested as a worthwhile predicament                                         There are states of mind and a transigent sensibility which would only functionally allow an energetic diffusion rather than diffusion and its differentiation 

The hidden function of semantics is relatable merely in suggestive harmony when the issuance of said words are applied as one

So to ask 

the preferred comment is (for today)   where will be if not absent-mindedly in a year’s time from this very moment?  Will it make all the sense to have proclaimed *we haven;t the slightest *we haven’t the foggiest * we haven’t the clue          until it is so (??)

most of like in this knowing will have just been repeated the same lines as if it had been pre disposed not only do we include a heightened connection where the stressors are indicative of a bigger function or further natality                             where the reasoning for this will come of its utility and for this being so, the “terminus” is Allocatable yet                                                                                   1) not invasive                                                                                                        2) not inclined                                                                                                         3) not voiced due to the suggestive hiatus made by its counterpart in its previous “voicing” as to the whereabouts of why it was seldom voiced or why it remains as unobstrusive as its previous unvoicing 

the thought of it may not be that much to be made of as often as its voicing       the true thought of is merely suggestive & evocative yet the dynamics of voicing it are disturbing at best                                                                                           Thought Is Dangerous yet: to have not been allowed its thought would be absurd

say this sure is an interesting video

...

oh hey look at that, at 0:09 that first chord he makes causes a standing wave.

hmm well let's see, the chord is d major so...

the string with the standing wave would be the root note, D of the third octave: 146.83 Hz.

normally this note would have a wavelength of 242 cm, but it's obviously compressed here (due to the rolling shutter of the iphone).

let's get some approximations going...

So the standing wave has a perceived wavelength of 3.9 cm. (I used my own thumb at that angle for reference here.) 

let's say the frame rate = n Hz 

keeping the ratio, you end up with an equation like this:

3.9 cm / 242 cm = n Hz / 146.83 Hz

this comes out to about n = 2.305 Hz

....which seems really strange, but if you assume I've misplaced my decimal point, you get a number that makes sense: 23.05 Hz

In other words, the camera was capturing video at 23 fps, according to the math.

24fps is a pretty common frame rate. a bit of googling and it seems that the iPhone 4 (as used in the video) records at 30fps ideally but drops to 24fps in low light. 

there is low light inside of a guitar.

this checks out.

THIS HAS BEEN ANOTHER EPISODE OF BS MATHTM

remember the last episode of BS MATHTM, where I attempted to calculate the height of a conical flask that I ordered based on a single picture of said flask?

It's a fun post so I encourage you to read it! but more importantly for here, this is the result I came up with:

a height somewhere between 10 and 11 centimeters. 

well, the flask came in today.

here is the result:

CLICK THAT IMAGE AND EMBRACE ITS BEAUTY 

RIGHT ON THE DOT

...except not really. including the unmarked bit at the bottom of the ruler, the height is, in fact, 11cm.

RIGHT ON THE MARGIN OF ERROR

MATH! FUCK YEAH!

oh and what's that weird dusty thing, you may have asked.

well that'd be some granular aerogel. 

it's pretty sweet, though sadly it's nearly impossible to take pictures of it.

so have some pictures:

1/2

BS MATHTM

so apparently the 9cm tall, 50mL flask that I want is no longer manufactured.

so I'll have to go with this 125mL flask I found, instead. BUT I have no idea how tall that is. 

however, I do have a picture of it:

which I can use to sort-of-guess the ratio of various things.

so the angle looks about like...72º I guess.

and the known volume stops before the end of the container. I'm just going to make a very scientific guess of "the 125mL mark is at 50% of the height"

that seems to be about what I was getting anyway. whatever.

-----

so.

what can we do with that?

well, we all know that the volume of a cone can be derived by rotating a linear function around an axis and taking the integral of that:

..and we have enough data to set that up. so let's go!

first we need to get all of our terms in relation to height (h), so the radius (r) becomes h/tan(72)

and since we're only measuring part of the cone, we need to start at the bottom (h). So, setting up the integral:

applying integral...

getting rid of the x and moving stuff around...

and there you go. all that's left is to solve for h.

blam.

the container is PROBABLY about 11cm tall. 

MAYBE