"When early settlers found an Aboriginal tool that looked like a hoe, it was dismissed because they had convinced themselves that there was no agriculture in Australia. If you're not looking at these tools with an open mind, they are considered aberrations. Alter your perspective by a few degrees, and the view is different. Robert Etheridge was palaeontologist to the geological survey of New South Wales and the Australian Museum in Sydney. In 1894, he speculated on the use of these 'hoes', and concluded that the myth that Aboriginal people had no knowledge of husbandry was a mistake based on prejudice. These implements have received very little study since that time, falling as they do outside Australian assumptions of Aboriginal achievement. Some commentators decided they were items of penis worship: the researchers assumed Aboriginal people were too backward to have cultivated the land, so the stones had to have a phallic significance. Australian scholarship has a variety of routes towards demeaning the first possessors of the soil."
Page 40-41 of "Dark Emu" by Bruce Pascoe (Australian Aboriginal author)
Emphasis added by me.













