As promised, here is why I am angry at Yale University.
On December 7, 2020, Yale released a research article, where they detailed a study done on autistic 2-year-olds. I don't even think they had actually turned two yet. They did this study to find out if autistics feel fear, and how they express it. That already sounds ridiculous, right? Of course autistic people feel fear. We are human beings. In fact, we often feel fear even more intensely than neurotypical people. Why did they need this study? It's already known that autistics feel fear, and often express it differently. Any autistic person can tell you that.
But wait - that's not all. In this study, they took these autistic toddlers and put them in a room with someone who was not allowed to speak to them. They repeatedly terrified these babies with mechanical spiders, robots, and grotesque masks, giving them between 30 and 70 seconds to respond. Autistic people do not process emotional information this quickly, so they absolutely were not given adequate time to recover.
They scared them over and over, to the point that parents were begging to have their children taken out. This part I can't verify for sure, as it is something I heard from multiple other people and haven't read elsewhere, so take that with a grain of salt.
What the hell? How is this okay? How did this study even happen? Things like this have long been considered unethical. It's 2020. Not 1820. This is abuse. It is so wrong on so many levels.
Even that isn't all. Yale University has social media pages, of course. And, of course, autistic people are understandably angry at them. Many people have been asking them to speak on this. To explain why they did this. To admit they were wrong to do this. Yale has been blocking these people. I've seen multiple screenshots proving this.
As of today, I saw their Instagram has been replying to comments, giving them a link to a statement they finally made, after being battered by comments that I guess they couldn't keep up with. In this response, which I read, they reiterate the study and what was done in it, and say that the children were only experiencing mild distress. But, with breaks that short in-between scares, and the nature of the study in the first place, this still seems wrong to me. It sounds like an excuse.
Just because children would "encounter these in everyday life" doesn't mean they should have those things repeatedly thrown in their faces in the name of "science". They didn't have to use babies, who don't have any understanding of what's happening to them. And why block so many people, who are all asking valid questions? Why ignore them, only until you can't handle the criticism anymore? There are much better ways to study fear in autistic people. Especially when this information is already known.
Here is the link to the study: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aur.2448
Here is the link to their statement: https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/29344/
Unfortunately, you have to pay to read the study. But you can read the description, and if you are in a college or university that has it in their databases, you can read it for free.
If you have Instagram, @actuallyautistictiktoks has a story highlight with videos from different people in the autistic community talking about this. At least one video shows screenshots of the paper.
As you can probably tell, I and many others are very upset about this whole situation. I don't think their response way okay or enough. They shouldn't have started with blocking people. They should have been upfront. Everything they say about it sounds like excuses to me.
Read it and interpret it however you want. You are allowed to have your opinion, and take the evidence however you want.
However, I feel strongly that this is not okay and was not handled well at all. We are allowed to be angry about it.














