Years earlier, critical damage to an oxygen tank and unseen wiring failures had passed through inspections unnoticed. Even though nothing looked wrong on the surface, Apollo 13 was already fundamentally compromised.

Two days into the mission, a routine command exposed what had been long hidden. An explosion tore through the spacecraft, instantly turning confidence into crisis. What was meant to be a straightforward journey became a desperate fight for survival. Apollo 13 was not undone by a sudden mistake. The defect existed long before it was finally revealed.

When Appearances Deceive: Sin Beneath the Surface

Scripture describes a similar unseen reality in the human condition. Sin is not merely something we drift into later in life. It is a condition we are born into. Just as unseen damage existed in Apollo 13 long before launch, that fall introduced a brokenness that affects every person born into the world.

“All have sinned and fall short of the glory of GOD.” Romans 3:23 (BSB)

As with all illustrations, this comparison has its limits. The failures aboard Apollo 13 were tragic accidents of engineering. The biblical narrative, however, describes sin as a conscious and willful turning away from GOD, as seen in Isaiah 53:6. The cause is different, but the condition is similar.

Something deadly can exist long before it is recognized.

Like those hidden defects in the spacecraft, this spiritual brokenness is often ignored as life moves forward: Plans succeed, families grow. On the surface, everything looks stable—yet beneath that exterior, humanity remains compromised & separated from a Holy GOD, in need of a redemption it cannot provide for itself.

Scripture goes even further, describing our condition not merely as flawed, but as spiritually dead. Yet it also proclaims GOD’s mercy and initiative, declaring that HE makes us alive in CHRIST (Ephesians 2:1–5). If this is truly our condition, then rescue cannot come from within us, but from beyond us.

Rescue, Not Self-Repair: Why the Gospel Begins With GOD

The survival of Apollo 13 could not be achieved through optimism or trying harder. Stranded in space with failing life support, the crew’s survival required help from beyond the spacecraft itself.

Mission Control in Houston worked relentlessly to design solutions that had never been tested then guided the astronauts through carrying them out. What followed was a remarkable partnership. The work took place aboard the ship, but the plan, authority, and means of rescue came entirely from the ground.

That distinction is essential for understanding the gospel. Scripture does not deny the importance of human response or obedience, but it insists that salvation begins with GOD’s initiative. Through JESUS CHRIST, GOD provides what we could never accomplish on our own. Forgiveness replaces guilt. Reconciliation replaces separation.

GOD does not merely offer advice for self-improvement. HE acts decisively as the Author of Salvation, bringing those who trust in HIM safely home. And as Scripture reminds us, genuine faith is never idle. It bears fruit in a changed life (James 2:17).

Before We Knew We Needed It: God’s Plan of Salvation

Apollo 13 eventually returned safely to Earth. What should have ended in tragedy became one of history’s greatest rescue stories, not because the problem was small, but because the response was extraordinary. The Bible tells an even greater rescue story: Sin is real, and separation from GOD is serious—yet GOD did not leave humanity stranded, HE acted decisively & at great cost to bring us home, as declared in John 3:16. For many, their perilous state remains hidden for a time. But GOD’s saving work does not wait for us to recognize the danger. It was already accomplished through CHRIST. Even our awareness of that danger is itself a work of GOD’s grace. This is the heart of the gospel and the reason it remains good news: our hope rests not in our awareness, but in a SAVIOUR WHO has already secured the way home.

NASA Lewis Aided Apollo 13 Investigation

At 1:07PM on Friday April 17, 1970, the Apollo 13 capsule splashed down into the Pacific Ocean less than a mile from the waiting rescue crews. A combination of relief and joy swept over a small team of engineers at NASA’s Lewis Research Center (now Glenn) listening in on direct audio feed between the crew & Houston, as well as the clusters of other employees gathered around transistor radios. Astronauts James Lovell, John Swigert and Fred Haise (a former Lewis research pilot) were safe after a harrowing four-day ordeal. NASA immediately set out to determine the cause of the accident. On April 12, 1970 Apollo 13 was one day into its journey to the Moon, when at 9:08 p.m. the crew felt a jolt. One of the service module’s oxygen tanks exploded.

The explosion crippled the module, leaving it without its oxygen supply, power, water and propulsion. The astronauts crammed into the attached Lunar Module as NASA engineers devised a series of unique measures to maneuver it back to Earth.

Edgar Cortright, a former Lewis engineer, led the Apollo 13 investigation. He summoned Lewis safety expert Irving Pinkel to serve as an official observer. Pinkel had spearheaded the center’s Crash Fire Program in the 1940s & 1950s and was a key investigator for the Apollo 1 fire. Other Lewis contributors included Seymour Himmel, Edward Baehr and William Brown.

The investigators speculated a short circuit caused the coated wires inside the oxygen tank to burn, which resulted in an explosion.  NASA engineers had previously believed the coating, with its 620.6 F melting point, would not combust in the vacuum of space.

In mid-May Lewis’ Space Environment Branch carried out a series of drop tests at the Zero Gravity Facility to explore this theory. A combustion chamber was installed in the test capsule to replicate pressurized oxygen environment in Apollo oxygen tanks.  

The researchers performed eight drops using three different types of wire bundles, with & without conduit. They compared combustion in ambient conditions to that in microgravity and found the wire coating did burn in a space environment, although at a lesser rate than in Earth atmosphere.

On May 28, 1970, Pinkel submitted his recommendations to the investigation board. These included separating the wires so the flame from one would not ignite others, placing ceramic washers around the wire would stop flame travel, bundling the wires in conduit with flame retardant fittings at the ends & the testing of the systems in worst-case scenario conditions.

The investigation board released its 914-page report on June 15, 1970 and appeared before Congress two weeks later. The inquiry led to more than a dozen modifications to the Apollo spacecraft, including replacing the insulation with steel conduits. Cortright thanked Pinkel afterwards, “Your dedicated participation was instrumental in bringing our work to a satisfactory conclusion in a relatively brief time span.”