#again why?

If you're referring to the post I reblogged from questions-for-christians, please use a little reading comprehension and realize that I wasn't actually the one who replied to it, @sorekbekarmi was. I reblogged it because his view was very interesting and well-articulated.

That said, even if I had replied to it, (a) the question was about a shared text (not NT) and (b) the Jewish view is very similar to views I held as a xtian even before I had the language of Judaism to explain it. Presumably there are xtians that might find that perspective interesting for a similar reason. And (c) it really sounds like you're angling for a "this isn't for you/appropriation or adjacent" criticism, which is hilarious. Xtians arguably appropriated the entire Tanakh, and have spent the last two thousand years trying to "replace" Judaism, often violently. Even now, far too many xtians appropriate rabbinic Jewish practices which is ridiculous because those didn't even exist at the time Jesus lived.

Until y'all stop holding xtian "seders," celebrating Chanukah, and collecting sifrei Torah as if they were simply expensive artifacts, I have zero (0) patience for that argument. And that's not even getting into the whole hot garbage tire fire that is the J4J crew lmao.

Why did you even bother sending this to me, especially on anon? 🤔🤔🤔