Haruki MurakamiāsĀ āThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicleā (pt.2)
This post includes some minor spoilers for the novel.
After writing the last post onĀ āThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicleā, I feel like thereās still some unfinished business with this book, for when I looked at the magical realism in the novel, it seemed like Murakami is painting an indifferent world, in which humans are merely thrown into. But when I think about it, the book isnāt really that bleak, and the protagonist, Okada Toru, sort of proves that.
One thing that made it difficult for me to get into the novel at first was Toruās passivity. It is of course essential to have an active protagonist, or else we wonāt have a story. But for most of the novel, things happened toĀ Toru, instead of Toru making things happen, and it does make the reading experience a bit stale.
But as I was thinking about how the novel offers no explanation about the strangeness of Toruās reality, I begin to realize this sounds kind of depressing. Yet, the novel does not feel depressing, because Toru eventually makes a choice.
After his wife Kumiko left, the Kano sisters tell Toru to give up on finding the cat (the symbol of marital bliss) and to leave Japan for a while, but in the ending of Book 2, Toru decides to stay and find Kumiko. No, to be more accurate, he is still waiting for something to happen most of the time. Then how is that a change in Toruās character?
I think we often forget waiting can also be a choice. Toru waited before and after he made a decision to stay. In appearance, itās as if he has no character development, but Toruās purpose for waiting is different in these two scenarios. Before Kumiko left, he just left his job. He is aimless and is simply waiting for something to happen. After Kumiko left, he is going against what the world is telling him to do and chooses to wait for something that can guide him to his wife.Ā
Choosing to wait is his act of defiance against a world that doesnāt make any sense, a world that forces us to move along its strange flow. The reappearance of the cat, despite Malta Kanoās prediction that it will never come back (and her predictions are written to be flawless and always accurate), is a representation of Toruās defiance against the reality that is constantly out of his control, and this is because he chooses to stay and wait. This simple choice directs how the story is going to go.
So is Toru a passive or an active character? Iāll say he is an actively passive character. Toru is the proof that in a world that moves uncontrollably, sometimes, passivity can be an action. Because, ultimately, our overt actions are not the most important thing. What drives those actions are our choices, and what we choose can make a difference.










