Among the well of red flags in the intervention it seems obvious that Feyre is taking up the mantle of the family member that out of love became the enabler coming to terms with having to cut off their âaddictedâ family member which the topic alone is very meaningful and deep but the problem is itâs insane to me how it canât be more transparent that it doesnât hold any weight because Nestaâs story was not given that same weight and respect that an addicted persons story would entail. Nesta being an actual alcoholic wasnât a part of the story so why should I offer Feyreâs character what it is to have an actual addict family member??? I notice most counter argument fall along the lines of saying that thatâs not how the story was written so why canât I just see it for what it presents and shut up. A step above that is that some people do conviniently question the narrative only when it serves the purpose to reaffirm their already biased opinions against Nesta usually elevating an ic member in the same breath. Do you see it or is it just me đŠ
Ps Iâd post from my acotar sideblog, wolfnesta, but I canât /: tis I though!
One of my pet peeves is when readers try to headcanon the hell out of the narrative and then argue with you about why you must accept their version of the story. Many such cases with ACOTAR, as I expressed in another post.
Youâre completely right, Nestaâs addiction really isnât part of the story. Maas uses Nestaâs alcoholism and hypersexuality as a means of justifying the inciting incident of her so-called âhealing arcâ but doesnât actually care about exploring it any further. We hardly see Nesta truly craving the things that numb her pain, or tangible negative consequences that arenât a minuscule dent in Feysandâs joint account. She experiences next to no symptoms of alcohol withdrawal, and her having sex with Cassian while confined in the HOW is never regarded as a coping mechanism. This is why I roll my eye whenever people try to act like Nesta was a genuine depiction of an addict.
The people who portray Feyreâs struggle as one of a family memberâs to an addict are not serious people. Iâm partially joking about that remark (but Iâm also partially not). Feyreâs real struggle is that Nesta is embarrassing her in front of her tenuous new friend group who she doesnât yet feel secure enough with to stand up to. Hence why Nestaâs ârecoveryâ is centred around the comfort and sensibilities of those with the power to control her. This is evident from the fact that Nestaâs forced confinement was justified byâŚ*checks notes* heavy spending, promiscuity and drinking. It was an extreme measure in a situation that was not severe enough to justify it. The only way I could even potentially justify this kind of approach would be if Nesta was an active (and imminent) danger to herself and others. This is another example of SJMâs laziness and lack of imagination. Nestaâs new and unpredictable abilities coupled with PTSD, frequent inebriation and emotional distress could genuinely pose a serious threat to the public. We know that oneâs emotional state can impact their powers, and I could easily see Nestaâs powers flaring up because of that. However, no such thing ever happens and her threat level to the public is mild at best. Making the drastic measures taken by the Inner Circle completely unwarranted.
But back to the main pointâŚyouâre completely right about the selective interrogation of the narrative and its logic. Trying to paint Feyreâs actions as an acceptable way to respond to a struggling individual is just another way to absolve her. It elevates Feyre in a way that is very generous and helps these fans reaffirm their ideas about Nestaâs treatment. Itâs a counter argument that conveniently ignores the lack of weight Nestaâs addiction had in the story and fills in the gaping holes that Maas didnât bother to fill in. All this to sayâŚI completely see it.
Sidenote: I really liked this ask! This was a bit of a crossover since I follow you on my other side blog. Love your posts and analysis!