#academic corruption

"I need a man, not an education"

"I need a man, not an education"

"I need a man, not an education"

"I need a man, not an education"

By: Office of Public Affairs

Published: May 14, 2026

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has completed a year-long investigation into the admissions policies and practices at the Yale School of Medicine.

Yale’s documents show that its leadership intentionally selected applicants based on their race. Yale’s documents reveal that they studied how to use racial proxies to circumvent the Supreme Court’s prohibition on using race to select students. Yale’s admissions data demonstrate that Black and Hispanic students have a much higher chance of admission to Yale than White or Asian students with the same test scores.

“Yale has continued its race-based admissions program despite the Supreme Court and the public’s clear mandate for reform.” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “This Department will continue to shed light on these illegal practices, and demand that institutions of higher education comply with federal law.”

The investigation showed that, in general, Black and Hispanic applicants were admitted with consistently lower academic qualifications than their White and Asian counterparts. These facts support the Department’s finding that Yale violated the law by intentionally discriminating based on race in its admissions, in clear violation of federal law.

Medical schools use substantial federal financial assistance to train the next generation of doctors. The Department is continuing its focus on eradicating illegal race politics from admissions at medical schools, where quality and excellence are vitally important to public safety.

––

==

Hopefully this serves as a warning to every other institutionally racist university.

Let's see what I can do for this one.

cw: sexual exploitation obviously

It's parent-teach conference night, and Khan has made the decision to actually attend this year instead of taking his usual shift watching the door. He really upset Uzi last week, and he wasn't sure where he went wrong, aside from leaving her for dead. So he wanted to start making it up to her.

First things first, after missing school for a week, he'd attend the conference to figure out what he could do to support her in getting caught up. How was he to know that Uzi wasn't making any friends, and was failing all her classes? Has she been in detention this whole time? He thought she was just hanging out with others after school...

And to imply that his daughter was damaged in her code!?

"How is she like at home?"

She- when was the last time he actually talked with Uzi? The blank his mind drew made his chest ache.

Though, apparently it wasn't going to matter, after enough incidents, enough school missed, and most of all, letting those murder drones into the colony, Uzi's report file was finally large enough to get her expelled from school.

Khan was freaking out. It's not like there's a different school in this colony his daughter could attend. If she was expelled, she'd essentially be forced into being a high school dropout. He didn't want that future for her. He was so focused on keeping the colony safe with his doors, he didn't care about what his daughter wanted. The least he could do is make sure she had the chance to choose the life she wanted. She can't do that without finishing her education.

There had to be something he could to to change the teacher's mind.

So an olive branch was given. Khan was told to come back at the end of the day.

It got a bit complicated as Uzi returned from her self grounding with one of the murder drones, and the place was being wrecked by some monster as people began disappearing left and right. But eventually he was able to reschedule a time to meet with the teacher.

And he was told to strip.

The teacher lamented how he was hardly paid enough to make this job worth it, his ex wife divorced him years ago and he hasn't had time to date since, and while the trope was usually it would be a student offering sexual favors to keep their grade up, he isn't exactly keen on the idea of being pleasured by someone his daughter's age. A desperate parent however...

And so a deal was made. The teacher got to ride Khan every night, and the expulsion case on Uzi would never be presented. Additionally, fulfill his fantasies without complaint, and the teacher would make it his personal interest to boost Uzi's grade, and turn a side eye to any future antics.

Whenever the teacher's place was empty, Khan would force himself to visit each night. And when it was the teacher's turn to have custody over his daughter Lizzy, he'd go over to Khan's. Khan made sure Uzi was none the wiser, always pressing his head to her bedroom door first to check if she was blasting her "nightcore" music, before inviting the teacher in.

The video above comes from a piece the activist class at the BBC ran back in 2023 where they clearly did zero background or fact checking on the story because they were furiously masturbating over the intersectional win of this DEI hire. ⤵️

––

You have to understand that everything on the above page is fake. Their… "fields" are all fake. The sentences are fake; those words, organized in that order don't say anything real. Even the "men" are fake. (They're troons.)

People with a "Gender Studies" degree are qualified for exactly two things – no more, no fewer.

Teaching "Gender Studies". Thereby perpetuating the cycle of uselessness.

Pouring coffee.

By: Andrew Doyle

Published: Aug 3, 2026

Jason Arday’s improbable claims have turned him into a Walter Mitty for our times. As the youngest black person ever to be appointed a professor at the University of Cambridge, there are good reasons why those who have championed him are rushing to his defence. But with each passing day, new revelations of his slippery relationship with reality seem to be emerging.

As with many fabulists, it is difficult to know where the truth ends and the fiction begins. Some of Arday’s boasts are quite obviously false. For instance, nobody believes that he completed the last nine of thirty consecutive marathons with a fractured leg that had swollen ‘to twice its normal size’. Or that he appeared in the television series Seven Up! as a child, even though its participants were selected in 1963 and Arday was born two decades later.

Other claims might well be embellishments on kernels of reality. No doubt he has raised money for charity, but it seems highly unlikely that his vaunted sum of £5.5 million is accurate. We know that he played snooker, but his assertion that he did so professionally would carry more weight if someone on the circuit had heard of him. Few would dispute that Arday is a keen amateur athlete. But if his claim to have run six hundred miles in six days were true, that would place him among the world’s elite sportsmen.

Perhaps most serious of all are the accusations of plagiarism. Cambridge has been quick to dismiss the matter, stating that an investigation has already been conducted by Liverpool John Moores University, where Arday completed his PhD thesis, and no evidence of plagiarism was found. Many readers who have compared the relevant passages side by side have reached a different conclusion. Numerous examples have been collated by Nathan Cofnas and can be seen here.

The refusal of the authorities at Cambridge to investigate the allegations properly has naturally raised suspicions that Arday is being protected because he is the poster boy for DEI. If it is true that he was raised on a council estate, diagnosed with autism at the age of three, first spoke at the age of eleven, and learned to read and write at eighteen, then his success story is unparalleled. Yet plagiarism is an extremely grave matter for an academic, and the evidence is difficult to dismiss.

The failure to hold Arday to the same standards as anyone else is, of course, a soft form of racism.

Those who have been wildly accusing his critics of racial prejudice might want to take a moment to consider whether they are engaged in a form of projection. Simon Baron-Cohen, Professor of Developmental Psychopathology at Cambridge, had circulated a letter to fellow academics urging them to sign in the name of ‘anti-racism’. It might well be that some of Arday’s critics are gleefully leaping on the controversy to discredit a prominent black man, but these are unpleasant outliers. Most people are simply concerned that academic standards are being degraded out of a misguided fealty to the creed of identity politics.

Baron-Cohen’s most shameful ploy has been to cite statistics regarding suicidality in autism and then raise concerns about the ‘impact of the media coverage on Professor Jason Arday who is autistic’. This kind of emotional blackmail ought to be beneath him. While it is natural to feel sympathy for anyone who is caught in a media storm, we cannot get around the fact that Arday is a high-profile academic at a top university. The reporters who have covered this controversy are not ‘bullying a vulnerable autistic man’; they are simply doing their job.

The notion that minorities ought to be judged by lower standards is undeniably racist, and yet this is precisely the stance taken by Arday’s cheerleaders. It is possible to investigate and report on this story without veering into cruelty, and virtually all reporters have acquitted themselves admirably in this regard. But it is no small matter that Arday’s promotion prevented other people – possibly also from minority groups – from securing a role for which they may have been better qualified. Arday is not the victim here.

At present, we have no idea why Arday lifted whole passages from another academic’s work for his thesis. According to the BBC, Arday has insisted that his autism meant that in his early academic work he would rely ‘on using mimicry to make sense of information, and that similar scrutiny would find similar errors in work by other academics’. But it is simply not the case that plagiarism on this scale is commonplace. Mistakes, of course, can be made. One might, for instance, jot down a quotation in note form without an attribution and then later take it to be one’s own writing. But look again at the sheer volume of identical passages; plagiarism does appear to be the most plausible explanation.

Hard as it is to believe, this may not even be a straightforward case of fraudulence. There are those for whom lying comes completely naturally, so much so that it is often their first instinct. The novelist Compton Mackenzie called such people the improvisatori, and famous examples he knew personally included Dr Axel Munthe, Ford Madox Ford, Lawrence of Arabia and the artist Dion Clayton Calthrop.

In the third volume of his autobiography, Mackenzie gives an example of one of these improvisatori, a military man who he refers to only as ‘T—’.

‘On one occasion cannibalism was a topic in the billiards-room. “I expect I’m the only one here who knows what human flesh tastes like,” said T—. We exclaimed in astonishment. “Yes, when I was on safari in Matabeleland soon after the war we had an unusually good soup one night. When I told my cook-boy how good it was he beamed and said it was because he had put in it a dead baby he had bought from its mother. Of course, I gave him a flogging and forbade him ever to do such a thing again.” “But didn’t you feel horribly sick when you heard what your cook-boy had done?” we asked. “Yes, I suppose I felt a bit squeamish but I have to admit that it was a really excellent soup.”’

It is a perfect example of the genre: an anecdote rich in detail and told with conviction, but utterly false. In such cases, it is not that the lie serves a purpose, but that it reveals a curious tendency in the man whose first instinct is to dwell in fantasy.

Some liars believe their own lies. Some simply relish the attention or the sense of power that often accompanies a successful deception. It is useless at this point to speculate on Arday’s motives, or even if he is aware that he has done anything wrong. Yet as a high-profile figure at a top university, any evidence of professional misconduct must be investigated. The issue is not race but standards, and a university that cannot distinguish between the two has lost sight of its purpose.

––

==

The inevitable result of DEI, affirmative action and identity politics.