Assessment 2: Final Statement
My work challenges and refocuses notions of value and purpose, forcing viewers to be confronted by the conflicting elements they contain and from this develop a response â be it disgust, or a greater understanding. It is this which constitutes an act of rebellion, simultaneously contravening and adapting elements of expectation and convention (both in the world of art and design and in everyday life). Further, the sense of conflict, discomfort and even disgust generated is something which I believe is integral to creating contemporary rebellious works.
While I always intended to create a work which projected contemporary ideas of rebellion through the media of fabric and clothing, the actual process of doing so (and my original expectations) changed somewhat from the end of assessment one to the completion of this work. For me, assessment 1 explored rebellion at a very microcosmic level, contravening my own sewing/mending practice and the expectations or rules I had placed on myself. Building off of this, my initial research for this assessment looked at the history of rebellion in art and in dress, and at contemporary artists whose work blends both of these together â conveying socio-political messages (and often rebellious ones) through their work with textiles. While my ideas here were still somewhat vague, I did have a sense that I wanted to build off of the first assessment. However, inspired by ideas from our class tasks and following an initial photo shoot, the premise of my work shifted. While it still focussed on textiles and retained the aspect of pushing back against established expectations, I had found a specific focus (and one more separate from assessment 1, though still informed by it).
Consequently, my work focusses on value, and how the juxtaposition of âdirty ragsâ with more conventionally beautiful artistic methods create confusing and often discomfiting responses for audiences. This idea of discomfort was primarily drawn from my observations of the reactions of people involved in my project, and the implications of this. Classmates who originally offered to model for me reneged on this when they heard my intention to use rags, and the model I finally found expressed disgust and even fear when confronted with these materials. These surprisingly vehement responses generated new ideas for me, and an awareness of the powerful effects that such a juxtaposition of ideas had the potential to generate.
Each individual âvignetteâ in my final work present conflicting and antithetical elements. They both embrace and reject artistic tradition and conventional notions of beauty and value, and this juxtaposition of concepts has the ability to generate a surprisingly strong reaction. They are all (in some way) aesthetically pleasing, and reference artistic and creative conventions (such as colour theory, lighting, and composition), however they retain an underlying tone of discomfort, perhaps even disgust: âThey are beautiful, but of ugly things.â Viewers feel as if they are âbeing manipulated subtly because of thisâ, and the conflict generated makes it difficult to judge the images or assign conventional value labels. However, if they can âfeel (their) way through the fear of not knowing how (theyâre) supposed to feel about these booksâ, they can emerge on the other side âwith a better understanding of how (they) actually feel about them.â [1]
This conflict, and subsequent confusion and discomfort, is a key factor in creating contemporary rebellion in art. By refusing to comfort and placate audiences, such work rebels against the very institutions which are often key to its acceptance and survival (and that of the artist). Furthermore, being made uncomfortable is âa powerful way for us to learn what we care most about, where our boundaries really areâ, by prompting viewers to question: âWhy donât I like this?â or âWhy does this make me feel uncomfortable?â [2] While my work certainly isnât perfect and only explores this reaction to a relatively small degree, with minimal risk to either artist or audience (be it economically, socially or emotionally), it is still an attempt to do so and as such confirms these notions.
[1] Miki Johnson, âWhy Good Art Makes You Uncomfortableâ, Medium, https://medium.com/@heymikij/why-good-art-makes-you-uncomfortable-a7f2c19e96b8 (accessed September 18, 2018).
[2]Â Johnson, âWhy Good Art Makes You Uncomfortable.â
Ally, Brooke, Christopher LG Hill, Nicolas Ceccaldi, and Rare Candy. "Boulevard 1st Day." Centre For Style. http://www.centreforstyle.org/boulevard1stday.html (Accessed September 12, 2018).
Arts2Arts. "Is Art Still Rebellious?" Arts2Arts Online Magazine. https://www.art2arts.co.uk/magazine/is-art-still-rebellious/ (Accessed September 13, 2018).
De Marly, Dianna. âThe Nature and Purposes of Dress.â Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/dress-clothing/The-nature-and-purposes-of-dress (Accessed September 6, 2018)
Genocchio, Benjamin. "All Dressed Up at the Katonah Museum of Art."Â The New York Times, August 21, 2009. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/23/nyregion/23artswe.html (Accessed September 14, 2018).
Johnson, Miki. âWhy Good Art Makes You Uncomfortableâ. Medium. https://medium.com/@heymikij/why-good-art-makes-you-uncomfortable-a7f2c19e96b8 (Accessed September 18, 2018).
Tucson Museum of Art. âDress Matters: Clothing as Metaphor.â Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block. https://tucsonmuseumofart.org/exhibition/dress-matters-clothing-as-metaphor/ (Accessed September 14, 2018).
Various artists. âDress Rehearsal.â Centre for Style. http://www.centreforstyle.org/dress-rehearsal.html (Accessed September 12, 2018).