Student Republicans

The height of an election season makes it hard to remember that the values that unite us as Americans are greater than that which divides us. In every election, the nation becomes separated by a gaping political chasm.

What’s different this year is the exceedingly large portion of the population — particularly among political independents and millennials — who are deeply dissatisfied with the Democratic and Republican party nominees.

As the Libertarian candidate for President, my message to voters is simple: You have another credible alternative, on the ballot in all 50 states. You can support fiscal responsibility and social inclusion. You don’t need to vote for a candidate you don’t like in order to stop one that you like even less. We polled at 13% nationally and 62% of Americans told the pollster on Aug. 25 that they specifically wanted me included in the debates.In spite of all this, the Commission on Presidential Debates decided that only Clinton and Trump will be permitted to speak at Monday night’s debate. 

You have a third party candidate with an actual, genuine chance that isn’t a psycho, has a solid background, has built a business, have government experience, and has an actual idea of what he’s doing.

I was the Republican governor of the heavily Democratic state of New Mexico. I focused on good government and I got it done. The people of New Mexico reelected me by a comfortable margin. Ditto for Weld. Think of it this way: I’m someone you would trust to run your household and to keep it safe while you went away on a trip or a vacation. I could even fix a few things around the house. After all, the construction company I founded began as a one-man handy-man operation. Can you say the same for Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump?

I’ve balanced budgets and cut taxes. I’ve also spoken my mind about where the country needed to go on personal freedoms and marriage equality. In 1999, I became the only sitting governor to publicly advocate the legalization of marijuana. Sen. Bernie Sanders came to that viewpoint — a position that most Americans support — 16 years later.

I’m also a strong believer in our Constitutional rights to civil liberties and privacy. Our government should not be spying on the electronic communications of American citizens. Nor should our iPhones or Android devices be subject to unreasonable searches and seizures.

And I understand that, as a nation and as a society, we have unfinished business to right the wrongs of injustice suffered by minorities. Blacks are 30 percent more likely that white to be apprehended by the police; they are three times more likely to be searched; they are arrested twice as often as whites; and they are 75 percent more likely to be charged with offenses carrying mandatory minimum sentences.

It is not surprising that there is tangible mistrust, tension and frustration between the police and African-Americans, particularly black males. We need to speak honestly about these issues in order to address them. Let’s be honest. We have healing to do.

One of the biggest concerns that many voters have with both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, but particularly with Ms. Clinton, is the sense that she uses government power to advance her personal and political interests. She is the very status quo Americans want changed. She talks about progressivism, but lines her bank accounts with speaking fees from banks and special interests. That’s what crony capitalism is all about. Americans recognize pay-to-play when they see it, and they are really, really weary of it.

Having been governor of New Mexico, I know that legislation gets passed to benefit those who have money and influence. Then they buy more money and influence. As governor, I vetoed more than 750 bills and thousands of line items to keep crony capitalism away from government.

Another big difference between Hillary Clinton and myself is that I’m for our national tradition of peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations – while being extremely skeptical of committing ourselves and our armed forces to foreign conflicts.

As a Senator, she endorsed ill-advised foreign interventions. As Secretary of State, she was the architect of tragic and counter-productive policies in Libya, in Egypt and in Syria. These should not be America’s wars, and we ought not be prompting regime changes that serve only to replace bad actors with even worse actors and instability that makes us less safe.