- Main focus of my page will probably be MTP and BSD with some other things I like on occasion. Sometimes I have taken a dip into sociology and psychology analysis, i do general analysis of themes/ideas in the show I mentioned and sometimes i just do funny posts or highlights of trips in the future or even casual reviews im not sure yet. I also write fanfic now :) i'm on ao3 as starlostAlyssa.
- Not spoiler free for BSD/MTP manga!!!
- DNI - z!0nist, hom0phobe, r4cist etc.
- Anime/manga I like - Bungo Stray Dogs (both), Moriarty the Patriot (both), Yuri On Ice (anime), Case Study of Vanitas (anime + part of the manga), SK8 the Infinity, tgswiiwagaa (manga), the summer hikaru died (anime), (will update as I watch more)
- Other shows - Arcane, TGCF (donghua only currently), Derry Girls, etc. (some of these i like more intensely than other lmao, will update as I find any others)
- Kpop fan, Stray Kids are my favourites, also love ATEEZ, Purple Kiss, Xdinary Heroes, Twice, Loona, P1Harmony, NMIXX. Listen to a lot of other kpop artists overall.
- Other artists I enjoy - BABYMETAL!!!, Boygenius + their solo music, Ethel Cain, Fiona Apple, Chappell Roan, Poppy, Bambie Thug, Beyoncé, FKA Twigs, Bjork, etc.
- Other things I like/have - I love collecting stuff especially Kpop albums and manga, I ADORE ROLLERCOASTERS (special interest of mine), love me some lego (flowers sets especially), have a crystal collection I do not know how to use (they're just pretty), I have a collection of signed books if that's something you find cool, i'm starting to gain a decent amount of plushies for the first time since I was young (many of them are Kirby), now I'm a pokemon card collector (my fav is Diancie).
- Things I want to do/like to do - write powerpoints about my interests, infodump about things i like (majority of my posts), would like to try cosplay (either Chuuya or Sherlock), have tried scrapbooking before idk if i'm any good at it?, occasional lyric analysis, i enjoy organising things too. and sometimes the occasional silly post as a treat.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Why is William James Moriarty viewed first and foremost as a Christ, or martyr figure, before he is ever seen as human? There are two dimensions to explore: the actual medium itself and the fandom perception of William, and I do not believe these conceptions of William are by accident.
I must establish that this analysis is solely about William's role as a martyr as well as the impact it has on other characters and the fandom. I will not be exploring other characters unless it has to do with William's role as a martyr.
Note: All manga panels were taken from MangaFire.To. I wanted to establish this in good faith. I will pull quotes from this version of the manga in case people wish to check my source.
The Martyr Is Never Human
First and foremost, the martyr is never human. Upon the achieved state, the martyr no longer has any autonomy of his person; the martyr is stripped of anything that had made him human. Upon achieving martyrdom, this person becomes a reverent symbol that is to guide others underneath a cause; the martyr is only holy as anything profane, any vulgarity that tainted the martyr before the most blessed death, has vanished. (This is a reason why I cannot stand martyrdom for the martyr is stripped of their very humanity; I weep for the ones who lose their humanity in exchange for a forced holiness).
From the very first chapter of the manga, we have already deemed William a martyr. He is the harbinger of the Revolution; the Revolution, envisioned by Albert as a desperate, mad vision, is born from William's hands. Since the first chapter of the manga is told from Albert's perspective, he already colors our idea of William. William, in turn, has ascended past humanity because he is the embodiment of the cause; William is the call to arms. Without William, Albert's vision would have remained a vision. Without William, Albert could not have brought the Revolution into reality. If William, the Christ who walks amongst the bloody and the downtrodden, who decides to bestow punishment in absolution, were not to have turned his attention to a new world, then there would be no other martyr with his effectiveness. If we recall Albert stumbling upon the orphans demanding the blood of evil nobles, we have already deemed William as the only appropriate choice for Christ. Who else is to endure the sacrifice that must be undertaken? Who else is willing to lie upon the altar and bleed for humanity? Albert is a visionary, but he cannot bring the fruition of a world that must be drowned in blood first; even in prison, Albert finds himself incapable of self-slaughter. Here, self-slaughter turns William into divinity. He is the servant of a new Lord, and he is the hand that will deliver Man to paradise. William is a martyr because he is capable of denying himself personhood; he is capable of losing his autonomy to the Revolution. That is what makes him so effective as the Lord of Crime.
I find myself pondering, especially in the manga panel above, as to whether we ignore William's personhood because he is so irrevocably linked with being a martyr. William's purpose has fused with being Christ. Through the eyes of Albert, William seeks only one purpose: the absolute topple of the current hierarchy in favor for the eternal brotherhood of Man to flourish. That is the beauty of the martyr. The human is buried for the sake of the cause. William has damned any marker of identity, including his actual name. The martyr need not interject his own ideas for the symbol which he represents since it is decided for him; it is twisted in favor of those who worship him. William means something to each and every person he encounters. Through worship, they idealize the projections they impose on him. The martyr is the projection of hope in the eyes of whomever the cause serves. William is not any different as a martyr. With the wreath of thorns, did not Christ inspire the ideal in each of his worshippers? Did they not bow before the King of Kings because of what he represented? Centuries later, are we aware of Jesus of Nazareth the man, or do we still project our desperation onto the martyred son of God?
The Formation of Christ: Trial by Blood
The martyr has no personhood and the martyr has no autonomy. However, a martyr is not simply born to such a purpose, it is forged in a crucible. Upon meeting William in the first chapter, it has already been established that William has bound his identity to the Revolution, but there has been no baptism. Yes, it is certainly true that he has helped several of the working class and underclass, as evidenced in The Merchant of London arc. However, in my view, I do not classify this as his baptism. Going off my own theory that Albert is the visionary of the Revolution, William is born as his Christ the moment Albert's mother and brother, True William, are murdered. The burning mansion merely stands as a testament to the three brothers forming the Lord of Crime, from three to one.
I find that William's purpose is explicitly shown in the first chapter of the manga, and thus carries until The Final Problem arc. (I have only read some chapters of Part 2, but found it rather lacking compared to Part 1. Most of my information and theories spawn from Part 1 ). His name is not mentioned because it does not serve the Revolution. William James Moriarty, as the revolutionary lamb, has risen from the baptismal waters as the Lord of Crime, the Lord that ought to make the ashes of the old world to suffice as the fresh dirt of the new one. William's personal history means absolutely nothing. If we were to see William as a person first, his trial by blood would not stand as proof that a revolutionary form of Christ may emerge from the rotted decay of the old empire. The revolutionary Christ stands so that Rome does not last as an empire, but crumbles before the love of Mankind. Thus, in a sense, we do not need to acknowledge the person that came before William James Moriarty, the Lord of Crime. While several fans, including myself, desire to see the backstory in which William and Louis exist outside of Albert's image, I do not think it would add much. Going off my own desire to have seen William perish at the bridge, his final act of martyrdom, I think this conclusion would have enforced him as Albert and us readers intended. William is a man bathed in the blood of monsters, and he pays in kind with his own blood to ensure that sacrifice made will manifest in true kinship with one's fellow man. The manga had begun with Albert's projection of William as the only vessel capable of bringing about the Revolution, and in a perfect world, it would have ended with William's death. Thus, not only is the blood William shed merely a reminder of the more grotesque realties of revolution, but that blood may become water. Would it not be miraculous of blood to manifest as a clear spring?
Earlier, in the section The Martyr is Never Human, I speculated about Christ in a blasphemous, detached manner. I looked upon Christ not as a man whose sufferings attempt to save the world whole, but at how he is remembered. I theorized that we will never view Christ as Jesus of Nazareth. We will never associate Christ with any base nature that is common in all humans, but as a martyr whose ultimate sacrifice is the indication of the holiest of beings. The symbolism of Christ the martyr is more prevalent in our minds, religious or secular, then of Jesus, the man. Whatever projections we may have, the martyr Christ serves a symbol of hope and absorbs all projections on however each person wishes to utilize him. Christ is a collective belonging, and there is no interjection of individuality in which we can draw from. Just as Christ was tied to the salvation of men, so is William tied to the Revolution. As a martyr, as the symbol in which we project our desires and hopes, William will first and foremost be a collective belonging. Whether by the characters in the manga or the readers, it is not William's personhood that is hailed as holy but the symbol he represents. No martyr will ever regain their autonomy once they have been slain for the cause.
I Have Created You on the Seventh Night, and That Is Good
First, I realize that I am imitating the Old Testament, but I always adore reading the creation story. Perhaps I am outlandish or even a fool to believe that Albert is essentially a representation of God in the manga. Aforementioned, Albert is the visionary for the Revolution, and it is born of his mind and heart. He desires to bring his utopia into existence, but he has consistently shown that he is quite unable. Thus, that is where he must latch onto William, and Louis to a lesser extent, to do his bidding. I charge Albert with the vision of the Revolution because it is he who not only provides the resources but is the center of it all. All action is derived from his intentions. William does act in Albert's name, and serves under Albert's name. (I would like to remind the reader of the manga panel I have chosen from the section The Formation of Christ: Trial By Blood in which William explicitly mentions that he serves in Albert's name, and that his anticipated murder is guided by Albert's will).
Throughout the manga, Albert is not directly involved in most plots. Besides using MI6 as a shadow branch of the Lord of Crime, his resources, and influence, Albert is distanced from the action itself. This is where I would like to make an analogy where Albert acts as God, the Father, and William is the Son, and it is only the Son which intervenes in the world of Man. (I am imitating Paradise Lost this time, especially the separation of the Father and the Son, but it suits Albert and William very well. Credit this analogy to Mr. John Milton!).
From the very first chapter of the manga, it is William who has already made a greater impact on the working class and underclass than Albert. Though one ought not to discredit Albert's service to the orphanage and those less fortunate, his ideal world is still an abstraction that he cannot force into the real world. This obviously makes sense since even though he has resources as an aristocrat, Albert would have been shielded from the horrors of poverty. He would not have been interacting much with the underclass and working class save for the orphanage and other potential servants. In fact, the most exposure Albert gets to the world outside aristocracy and luxury is by serving the nuns at the orphanage. William, however, has become more versatile in his service. While his genorosity extends to the children and nuns of the orphanage, his services are indiscriminate. This is seen when Albert realizes that that William was the mastermind of the robbery at Thompson Manor, recalling how William described the logistics of using a tunnel to reach the estate. Here, we see that William is an active actor in the world of the underclass. It does not matter that the gentlemen who robbed the manor were criminals, it is that they were of the underclass of England. Just as the Son acts on the behalf of Man so does William act on behalf of the underclass. He is unbiased toward whoever needs his help because the underclass, in totality, has been under the heel of oppression. Christ did not choose which person is deserving of his mercy and which is not.
Even by Albert's own thoughts, he realizes that William is the one who shall bring his ideal world into existence. The Father has come up with his ideals and laws for the universe, but it is the Son who may execute them. The Father is distant, and his reach only extends metaphorically. He has built the world in which the Son may act. Albert is not only the influential and financial hand, but it is he who created the conditions in which the Lord of Crime may actually hold ground. Yet, it is William's plans and his direct intervention which guides the fate of oppression to ruin. It is William who bleeds on the altar to ensure that the ideal has actually come to pass. Albert is responsible for the genesis of William. Thus, William acts on Albert's behalf in every echelon in society. As Albert lingers in the abstraction, William alchemizes it into reality.
Abel and His Remorse for Cain
This section will probably be the shortest, but it is imperative to have within this analysis. I cannot fully argue about William as a martyr without failing to acknowledge that his personhood actually does exist. Let us turn to The Final Problem arc. There are two paramount human interventions that directly battle against the rising climax of the Revolution: Louis and Fred. I will spend more time on Louis here, but Fred's intervention is paramount to understanding William too. Obviously, Fred is crucial to this arc. He is the one who got the closest to William as the Revolution's demand for sacrifice and blood rose. Fred is the one who confronted William and tried to understand him as a person rather than by his title as martyr. William, noticing Fred's empathy, even told Fred about how he truly views the world and judgement. I'd say this is one of the few chapters in which William is allowed to exist as solely human. He may exist as one of us, without punishment, without the tarnishing of his identity as Christ and the Lord of Crime. He is given a mercy no martyr is ever given; he is allowed to reclaim his personhood, even if it is only for minutes.
Louis is the one who understands and loves William the most. Although we have not seen much of their origins, it is clear that Louis, despite being relentlessly pushed away by William, understands him in a way many, including Albert and Sherlock, do not. As early as the Hounds of Baskerville arc, we see William unable to tolerate the rising tide of the Revolution. Louis pushes hard to take the suffering from his brother onto his shoulders, but William cannot tolerate Louis ever being crushed by the responsibility. The new world, in William's mind, was made for Louis alone; Louis should be the first person to return to Eden.
I mentioned Abel and Cain. Let me be clear, the traditional parable of Abel and Cain do not suit Louis and William, but there is an aspect I draw inspiration from. William's perpetual guilt of Louis being dragged into the Revolution's destruction acts almost like a metaphorical murder. In Chapter Ten, William says, "Louis, I wanted you, just you...to enter that new, cleansed world." By bringing Louis into the plots of the Lord of Crime as opposed to keeping him far away, William's agony manifests as guilt. It is as if he has murdered his little brother by damning him to being swallowed by the Revolution. In my tangent, Cain is not a selfish, jealous man but a remorseful being who has foreseen his brother's end. Brother is a treasured word for it only applies to the one. Yet, Louis is well aware of William's suffering, and it slowly kills him inside. Watching the Revolution unfold and the toll it takes upon William personally is unbearable. To Louis, William is not a martyr or the revolutionary lamb, he is just William. Upon this, Abel is watching Cain live out the monstrosity of his mark; he can see how Cain wanders around in the aftermath of his destruction. Then, could one say that both Cain and Abel are intolerant of his beloved brother's suffering?
Louis, in my mind, has always fought back against the utlimatium that the Revolution issues to all those involved in the Lord of Crime. Losing William does not just mean the lingering heartache after the Revolution has swallowed her favorite son, but it means that never will William emerge out of clay and dirt again. Once the Revolution has reached its apex, it will discard William. The message has been delivered and the purpose has been served. I doubt Louis wishes to live in a world without William, even if William had formed the new world just for him. One conclusion is be reached: William has been humanized, and that cannot be ignored just because the Revolution demands a symbol.
Woe to You, Creator of Light
(Clearly, dear reader, I cannot stop with the biblical references and metaphors. I have not finished reading the Bible. I am still on Genesis, how mortifying of me, but Luke 6:24-26 really gets to me).
Let us return to the idea of Albert as God, or the Father. To understand William's martyrdom and his branding as the Revolutionary Christ, it is imperative that Albert is established as God. Ad nauseam, I have mentioned how the very first perspective that colors our view of William for the rest of Part 1, is Albert's own imposition of holiness onto William. The Adventure of the Empty Hearts, Parts 6-7 establishes not only Albert's ideal world, but it also establishes on how he believes to have treated William to achieve the ideal world. Obviously, during his time in the Tower, he has had much time for reflection. Albert views himself as an evil noble because of his inaction. His inability to act before he met William is what, to him, requires the most condemnation. I do not think Albert ever wished for William to suffer, and it sears his heart upon seeing the toll the Revolution took on his younger brother. William is the manifestation of action; he alone manifested as a symbol of actualization for Albert. William proved that he shares the same vision as Albert, and he proved that he could be used in whichever way to bring about the ideal world. Drawing from the Father and the Son, Albert is able to use William in places in which he cannot or dare not enter. William serves him in all echelons of British society. Albert cannot act because he is a noble, and he must maintain himself as the eldest son and Earl of Moriarty. Yet, William is free to do his bidding by acting as the second son. William can move in directions that Albert simply cannot. Thus, the Son has once again served him in bringing about the ideal world via revolution.
This has come at a cost. William has suffered because his personhood, at certain points, have conflicted with his martyrdom. Although he always chooses to be the sacrificial lamb, William is wounded by his choices. He is not Christ in the initial sense, but in time? By choosing to serve the Revolution above all else, William will have been immortalized as the harbinger of true brotherhood. Albert knew, and still knows, the cost of what such a symbol would entail. William's metaphorical end was unavoidable; the martyr falls from the Cross once there is nothing left to be extracted. This guilt consumes Albert alive. It will never let Albert forget about the consequences of his own influence.
Just as creation exists so does destruction. Albert, through using William, did manifest his ideal world into practice. Now, one must think of the cost. Out of his own inaction and guilt, Albert condemned himself to the Tower. William had sacrificed himself, but Albert does not think it enough. Even though he could never feel the same nails that had driven William to the Cross, Albert self-flagellates so he can experience a shred of what William had to endure. Was it then too late to repent for the Son when he has already fallen? The Father had known His Son would fall to the hands of Man and Evil, that is apparent. Did it cause the Father such torment to see His Son fall that He Himself emulates the punishment too?
Blessed is the Persecuted, but His Is Not The Kingdom of Heaven
(Last blatant reference to the Bible, I promise, dear reader).
To end this incoherent mess, I wish to discuss the implications of William's martyrdom, in particular, for the readers and fandom. This is not necessarily to speak on fandom behavior or mischaracterization, although that tends to be rampant in some parts of the fandom, but overall how William embodying the martyr archetype impacts the reader's own view about how he is perceived.
Let me begin with my own perception. Upon my first read of the manga (Part 1), I found myself viewing William less in isolation and certainly less as an individual. Often, I would perceive his character through the perspectives of the surrounding characters. His actions were not taken in relation to his individual self. Instead, I would attach William to his outcome. For example, let us take the Hounds of Baskerville arc. When Fred asked William if they could save the children, and William agreed fervently, I did not equate this to William's actual personality, but to what he represents. William is the personification of the Revolution. While he has a kind heart, saving the children, in my mind, was an extra detail. I was focused on the villain because the eradication of the villain is what is essential in demonstrating William's capabilities as both the martyr and Christ of the Revolution. In shorter terms, the plot served to add to William's purpose, not necessarily to highlight his individuality. Like so many, I made the mistake of viewing William in service of revolutionary triumph rather than looking at a good man who despised seeing the innocent and oppressed suffer.
I do not think this is a failing of any particular reader. From the very beginning, we are introduced to William not as an individual, but as a symbol of everything righteous. His role in this grand narrative is to bring forth a new, ideal world. His actions are linked so heavily to the Revolution that at times, it is difficult to find a shred of William's individuality. Upon Albert's first perspective to the very final arc where everyone hinges on William's plan to succeed, the reader is reminded that William is the Revolution. Since his introduction, he has had no choice but to choose the wheel that shall break him.
William is a revolutionary martyr. Upon binding him to the Revolution, his personhood is gone. Christ acts in service to his disciples and followers, and he does not ask for anything; he who has been risen to the status of holiness loses the claim to humanity. Many think that the holy is worshipped, but it cannot exist without the narrative imposed on it by the profane.
WIP - Snippet of a long yuumori AU I'm working on (this is from chapter 4, of which I'm aiming for 13-15? And I have 9 complete as of now, I plan to start posting it once i'm close to being done on my Yuumori ITW AU).
Guess which game I based it on (it's in the hashtags but I do take some creative liberties with the story. It's very much relationship (sherliam) focused to begin with but the game stuff matters more as the story goes on).
I started working on this story a month ago bt, this is no small matter to me. I'm really loving this story and exploring the yuumori characters in this scenario/setting.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
As I considered writing about in this post, the first chapter of my yuumori into the woods au is now up! it's a big introductory chapter really making the world make sense - sherliam meet next chapter and alcroft the one after that! i'm going to post weekly because i still need time on writing/editing a few chapters
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
Songs I associate with Sherliam Part 1 because i'm really fixated on them rn
Most Wanted Man - Lucy Dacus
(I could imagine Sherliam on a case for the Pinkertons in mid-western America in the timeskip, with this song mostly being from Sherlock's pov. i like the idea of 'trying to write the book' on william as developing a full understanding of him in the greatest detail, especially considering the only existing book on him is Watson's (Conan Doyle's) portrayal in the Final Problem. so Sherlock would write the real 'book' on him, but for themselves and no one else. that kind of deal.)
i'd already posted about this on twitter but i'd rather share it here too because i really like this song!! listen to Lucy Dacus' music it's amazing
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A selection of my favourite Morimyu Sherliam motifs
I watched most of Morimyu/Morimu for the first time about a month ago, and this version of Sherliam is probably close to my favourite representation of their dynamic (closely tied by the manga) because there's so many aspects that the musicals strengthens and deepens their relationship- especially with instrumental and lyrical motifs, so here's some of my favourites (mostly lyrical motifs):
[A lot of my lyric translations will be based off of @morimyulyrics and their translations]
- Sherlock the Violinist and William the Pianist -> So in Morimyu, most of the live music is done by two instruments - Piano and Violin. The Piano is almost a constant; it soundtracks the majority of scenes, especially when William and his allies are on stage. The violinist is only on stage and plays for Sherlock and his allies. The piano represents William - his control over the stage and narrative as the Lord of Crime. The violin represents Sherlock; largely because he's a violinist himself (as there are a few tracks where he mimics playing violin as the sound comes from the stage violinist). When they play in tandem, usually reserved just for Sherliam scenes, they merge very well and it's quite beautiful. William also controls the ends of musical pieces on occasion (see this post where I talk about this a little bit more).
- 'Catch me if you can' -> the classic line is turned into a song! The verse reads "Catch me if you can, Mr Holmes. If you can, go ahead and try, Mr Holmes." The concept of William being 'caught'/Sherlock 'catching' William comes up many many times as it did in the manga, but turning it into a song (and a reoccurring motif) feels very poignant and more emotionally driven.
- 'I hope'/'I will' -> this is the title of Op2's closing number, as well as seperate songs in Op4, and comes up a lot.
The 'I hope' side of the Op2 closer is William's desire for Sherlock to catch him - "Catch me if you can, Catch me, you can do it" - which expands upon the 'catch me if you can' theme to be more of a desire. The 'I will' of that same number is Sherlock's side, his commitment to apprehending the Lord of Crime (LOC) - "I will catch you, I will expose you, past all of the illusions" - and ultimately they (William and Sherlock will meet "at the end of this mystery."
Then in Op4 there's two pairs of tracks that express the same sentiment: the first sets up their desires and then the second shows a stronger desperation for them. Sherlock's first track 'I will' talks about him sticking with what he believes in and where his heart takes him in order to catch the Lord of Crime, no matter how "dark the fields" or "high a tower I must climb" (cheeky Tower Bridge reference maybe?). That "I will definitely catch you, with my own hands" is his dedication to unraveling the mystery and finding the Lord of Crime. William's first track 'I hope' is his desire to, when he lets his life go, have Sherlock by his side. The hope that he can get one wish, and that wish is for Sherlock to "catch my wicked soul". To him Sherlock is the "protagonist of the play I write, the light shining... and this light is too bright for me" - aka he thinks he is not worthy of it but he hopes Sherlock can catch him anyway.
William's second song 'On this path' is a much darker and depressive view, one where he essentially begs for it to be Sherlock who will kill him - "My heart silently hopes, please, at the end of all this. Sherlock, you'll be the one to do it. Extinguish the fire of my cursed soul... with your own hands, Sherlock". He thinks he is truly beyond saving ("I can't ask for salvation, nor forgiveness"), or being truly 'caught', with allusions to a 'cancer' grown on his heart and the 'scent of blood' on his fingers and his 'filthy body' showing him seeing himself as fully corrupted. There's that finest glimmer of 'hope', but it's now twisted to be about death. Meanwhile, Sherlock is dealing with the guilt of Milverton's murder but still thinking of William - "I know sinners do not deserve their wishes to be granted, yet this desire won't fade. Liam, I.. to you..". Sherlock still wishes to catch William (now that he knows he's the LOC), to "uncover everything about this most amazing mystery... stand in the same field and see the same things as you..". His more desperate wish, that he feels he doesn't deserve, is to fully understand William.
- "With your/my own hands" -> referenced in Op4's 'I will' and 'On this path' as shown above. Their mutual desire for the chase to end with them confronting each other, using their hands to catch (as Sherlock wants) or kill (and William wants towards the end).
- Rondo -> A type of composition, utilised by name in the song 'Swirling Rondo' (Op3) - where Sherlock likens his chase of the Lord of Crime to a dance where he does not know his dance partner by name, and the composition and moves of the routine are dictated for him. All he can do is follow in the steps he thinks the Lord of Crime wants him to do, simply "riding the rhythm of the rondo". With the Lord of Crime always disappearing no matter how he chases. William's side of the number also echoes my favourite recurring motif, as explained below. But they agree that they wish to find each other at the end of it all. Also the composition itself in this scene does actually feel like it's spinning, just as the characters are on stage (switching positions from stage front and stage back in a circle). Very smartly done scene.
- The wind blows -> whilst there are references in the reprises of Op1 and 2, the original utilisation of this motif comes from Op3's William solo 'In the isolated room'. Here William likens his heart to a frozen lonely room, where no warmth or movement can reach. But at some point, a breeze makes its way in - "A warm quiet wind caresses my cheek", makes his hair sway, moves his heart. Even lets him hope that "Perhaps even God will allow me this" - perhaps he can hope to have but one moment of peace. And he knows the source, as he says in the song, but he only expresses that fact that Sherlock is the breeze in the song 'Swirling Rondo'. The phrase 'The Wind Blows' reoccurs in a few different songs, including but not limited to: 'Holding my heart' (op3), 'I Hope' (op4), and 'William & Sherlock' (op5)! This is such a beautiful motif in my opinion because it really strengthens how much Sherlock means to him.
- Hearts -> a lot of Sherliam's lyrics make direct references to the concept of their hearts: as an example of how they are affected by each other. Such as 'Swirling Rondo' having lines about the "rondo of our hearts," Sherlock's second solo from Op4 taking about how "I'll reach your heart" in reference to William, or William referring to himself as a "demon with a broken heart" in 'William & Sherlock', as well as the metaphor of the frozen heart in 'In the isolated room'. Not comprehensively covered by any means, because there's many instances of this.
- Orpheus and Eurydice -> Whilst I haven't seen Op2 reprise, I am aware of a new song that was added into that production during the two detectives arc through lyric translations by 'IHopeIWill13'. Not only do they both utilise the 'the wind blows' line, and reference the warming of hearts, BUT they also reference the tale of Orpheus and Eurydice. I understand this reference more now because I listened to the Hadestown soundtrack, but essentially this greek myth revolves around a musician falling for a beautiful woman (I think she's a Nymph, although research is unclear) who tragically dies, and he makes the journey down to hell to see her again and plays a song so beautiful it inspires compassion in Hades, who lets them try to escape the realm on one condition - Orpheus cannot look back at Eurydice, or she is doomed to die. William's line "You are like Orpheus, showering a beautiful melody into my universe of scattered numbers" and Sherlock's line is "You are like a nymph, drifting deep within the forest of mysteries, toying with me." Now, Orpheus' song in his grief was told to have moved everything, living or not, in the world - that's the kind of power William associates Sherlock with, which is crazy; also note how both of them talk in a specific relation to themselves - "my universe", "toying with me" - it's symbolism related entirely to their own feelings rather than outside symbolism. It's personal. Also in a sort of foreshadowing; as Orpheus, Sherlock is not able to truly look upon William (to fully understand him) until the Final Problem (where William is supposedly doomed to die), much like Eurydice.
[This is also not comprehensive coverage of all the motifs between them, but just a few I like the most. I really need to watch the reprises because I've heard there's some great fibonacci symbolism in Op1 reprise which interests me. Apologises if these explanations are confusing, it's hard to work with PLUS I started this a month ago and only just added a few other points.]
Analysing the Albert Mycroft scenes from chapter 4 because I think it's really effective
Unironically I think these scenes tell you quite a lot about both of their characters especially Albert given that it's one of his first chances to shine after the backstory chapters!
So first of all, it's important to know how they even got in this situation in the first place - an opium ring is spreading across England off the back of the dissolution of the East India company, where it is rumoured that opium trading routes were handed over to nobles and high-ranking navy individuals (it's also linked to the mafia, which this series mentions a few times but rarely actually handles). The military and the house of lords are refusing to move to take down the organisation (likely because some of them benefit from the ring), so a military friend brings up the attempt at creating a shadow organisation within the intelligence branch that doesn't need permission of the house to act and isn't swayed by political interests.
Albert's reaction is quite important here - that he'd heard there was simply "no money to fund it, so the project was tabled" and that "If I could get into that organisation, it'd surely be of use to William." It's clear that he's done great research, prioritising knowledge of the political and social spheres. He is aware of its potential as an asset to the plan (Albert is prioritising William specifically in this), and directly requests William to help him organise a plan that helps him into its ranks. Then they spend a whole month planning this out, sorting out all of the logistics before he even goes to meet anyone at the Intelligence division - he's confident in its success before they even strike the deal itself. They've rigged the board in their favour without anyone knowing they're even in the game.
So now for the meeting at the Intelligence branch itself with Mycroft. Now, he is not named as Mycroft, but he is revealed to be at the end of Volume 3. Mycroft's first words seem a bit clunky in exposition - "and what would an indian army official such as yourself want from an intelligence official such as myself this late in the evening?" - but it also acts as a reminder of their ranks. Titles (Mycroft also uses his 'lieutenant colonel title afterwards) and ranks are incredibly important in this era, and Mycroft knows that a man like Albert would only show up at this time if it was an urgent or important request, so he's reminding him of the nature of such an exchange; that he, as military intelligence has the upper hand, and that Albert, if he wants something, needs to convince him.
Albert decides to forgo the titles after calling Mycroft 'Chief' once - he notes Mycroft's signifiers and plays back in opposite. His demeanour is generally much more casual, deciding to deliver his request as coming here to "talk to myself out loud." Of course, Mycroft is listening, and Albert knows this, and his request begins as an explanation of the needs and logistics (benefits and funds, mostly) when founding a shadow organisation. Mycroft is painfully aware of such things, and Albert is making sure that he knows that he is equally aware of the necessities. It's as if he's not talking about his own thoughts, but as if he's reading Mycroft's mind.
The line that brings it all together is "I will take care of all this myself," which brings a close to the logistical talk and acts as where he enters as a player in the game. He's offering to ease the burden on Mycroft's end, without the need for him to do anything but employ Albert in his stead. Albert's bold request is coated in layer of interpretive subtlety, where he gives the illusion of a concerned bystander but it is still clear that at the end of the day all he wants is this deal. Instead of taking the route of gaining trust and then making a bold request, Albert proposes the deal straight off the bat - using the request (and eventual results) to gain his trust.
And arguably this impresses Mycroft. It's that "Will you now? You have my attention." that really sells the idea that this boldness intrigues him. That upon studying his demeanour, gauging his personality, he is pleasantly surprised by the methodism, and welcomes it. He makes the deal right there and then, and it's by no means a small price - if the operation succeeds, he'd be transferring Albert to the military intelligence branch and letting him run that shadow organisation. It makes sense, given he'd be partly funding it, but also feels out of left field to trust a man he'd just met with such power. But Albert has clearly fascinated and convinced him enough in only a few sentences. Yes, it is still contingent on the results, but to even make the deal is an equally bold move on Mycroft's move.
Let's talk body language. Albert is aware that Mycroft is observing his every move intently, trying to gauge what he wants and if he is trustworthy. Yet his first decision is to turn away from his desk and instead adjust some of the memorabilia on his shelves. You don't usually turn away from someone when making a deal, given the fact it usually seems untrustworthy, but it's what he does with his hands. It's hard to tell, but it could be as if he's perfecting the placement of the items on the shelf. This shows Mycroft something else - that Albert has great attention to detail and a penchant for organisation. That he's calculated and orderly, which is the kind of person you need for such a role. And then there's the bow, and the hand to his heart - an action that's often seen as a sign of sincerity. He's indicating his honesty in taking care of the situation, and he's showing respect for Mycroft similarly with the bow. It's an indicator that he's not a threat, but an ally. That's part of how Mycroft comes to trust him. But still, each move seems calculated to elicit such an association. Albert is still playing the game, Mycroft allows it.
And Mycroft gets something he can't argue with - efficient results. The complete dismantling of the opium ring in a single operation, clearly calculated to perfection. Mycroft noticed this, and even points it out ("Makes me wonder just how much of this you already had planned out"), because that's the kind of mind he needs to run his organisation. Albert's insistence that's it's "all just a coincidence" is not supposed to be a convincing bluff - it's a calculated deflection from questioning the mind behind the plan (William, mostly) and what his ulterior motives may be. And this line from Mycroft - "well played, Lieutenant Colonel." Acknowledging that he's won this round, he gets his prize. He gets to lead MI6, with Mycroft as his superior.
Because they both know they're playing each other in some way. This makes much more sense with the foresight of chapter 17 (Scandal of the British empire act 1) - where Mycroft is aware of the fact that Albert has some ulterior motives, and he is prepared to test his loyalty to the empire. And Albert is aware that he's being tested. It's quite similar here - Mycroft knows Albert needs this position for something he's unaware of, and Albert knows Mycroft can't refuse these kinds of results. I do believe him and William will have done research into Mycroft prior to their meeting, and they are aware what he prioritises going in. With what Albert says and does, they play into his interests and necessities, in some ways like William plays into Sherlock's interests. But they're not quite playing opposite; they have a common motive and work as allies, but neither is trying to take the other down, considering how they equally benefit from their partnership. They sort of take to studying and testing in a mutual fashion. Each to gauge where the other's loyalties lie, and if they are to be trusted.
[I have more things to talk about with them... my recent reread has got me thinking a lot more about some characters and themes. I wish more of their interactions got into the anime or in morimu it's really important for their characterisations. Hope this makes any sense! I find it hard to transfer my thoughts into words sometimes.]
Still on my bullshit when it comes to fanfic writing so here's an Alcroft/MyAl fic where Mycroft thinks he is annoyed by Albert's confidence but he's actually really attracted to it or whatever. I researched a bit about wine for this. I don't drink alcohol.
Something I really love about post-timeskip yuumori manga is how it explores the grief over William's death in depth with the three characters in his group he was closest to - Louis, Albert and Moran - and how it shows different sides of grief. Yet they all fundamentally link back to the same idea: this quote from Louis during the latter chapters of the Final Problem.
"When you feel like you're at a dead end... if you can find one person, just one person to validate you, then you can go on living."
For all 3 of them, William was that person. With him gone, they want to share in his burden and do so in very different ways.
Moran shares in the burden by "taking up William's mantle" as that of passing judgement via murder. William was the one who gave him a purpose after his return from the battlefield, when he only had revenge on his mind. Becoming friends with William was becoming "his sword and shield until the day you die", but when the time actually came, he couldn't. When he died, he felt like he couldn't do the one thing he'd promised - "I failed your brother. I'll never forgive myself for how useless I was that day" - and so he wants to take on his place and role in order to keep this world peaceful. He becomes the villain for William's sake. Ironically, he'd once wanted the opposite - "the only person I've ever wanted to be a hero for is William" - because his connection with William is his driving force for what he does within the group. In his three years after going rogue, he barely cared for himself (letting his strength drop and not maintaining his prosthetic), perhaps out of the belief that he didn't deserve to, and comes back onto the scene still deeply believing and utilising in William's original methods. He doesn't believe he can atone, only that he can continue what William started. Learning of William's survival then lets him hope he has a way to atone, and hope that there's a way for that original promise to be fulfilled ("When the time comes, we'll go out into the good night together, all right?”). Because William is the one person who validates him and what he does.
Albert's way of sharing the burden is self-imposed exile because he blames himself the root of all the evil acts they took part in. His time in prison is essentially a part of him giving up on himself - "My soul has long since left this place. It's with you now" - and a deep dive into his way of thinking. Albert has a very distinctly strong moral code and way of viewing the world: in his youth he believed "the world was wrong" for its treatment of people based on class and he couldn't change it, but he could alter the things right in front of him. But when he does try to help a man, the thief goes right back to his ways and even becomes a murderer. Albert comes to believe that this was his fault ("By reaching out to him, I had changed the way things were supposed to be") and that he was the one in the wrong - "I was the one the world didn’t need. I didn’t have the know-how to change the world, nor did I have the courage to end my part in it.” Then he meets William, who has the knowledge he needs, who makes him realised it was the world that was wrong, who could "save me from my darkness." Hiring him to help murder his family, which saved him from his suffering, but in his mind doomed William ("I expelled him from paradise"). Albert had been the only one to see William's suffering in his role, but had "ignored it" because he was afraid of losing him. Now he believes his desire caused William's martyrdom and that he "caused you nothing but suffering from beginning to end". And now Albert thinks he is lost and alone again because of his hubris, resigning himself to darkness because he believes himself morally corrupt and indefensible - with William the only one who could have found him and validated him. Sharing the burden is not the same as atoning to him in that regard, but he does come to realise that to atone he needed time to study himself and claw himself back from such a way of thinking. His share of the burden is to him the 'original sin' element, the root cause of the situation and the fatal flaw which doomed his brother to die, and he posed the heaviest restriction he can on himself to take on that burden.
Louis' reaction is distinctly different because he is characterised by having more hope. His arc begins in the Final Problem, realising his brother never meant for him to die and has been validating his chance at life even when Louis himself believed it was worth nothing. So, in turn, he promises to cherish that life. The burden he takes on is the path to atonement, the role of Em. He's got a purpose to work to as Em, to "watch over this new world he made and make sure it says as beautiful as he left it". He believes William will come home, and he wants to maintain the peace for him until he does and long after. His moral compass also has morphed with it: MI6 try their hardest to prevent any death, and refuse to utilise murder to solve the left-over evils of society. He believes "criminals must be judged by the law" when it comes to their work, implying a new trust in the system that they helped create. It's very interesting that he polices it so forcefully because as much as he considers what his brother did 'right' in the long run, he doesn't want to follow in his stead - he doesn't want to add more lives to their shared burden. This system is not perfect, clearly - Moran points out that there are still corrupt people who deserve punishment that the law may not be able to deliver - but they do what they can without murderous means. Because that's what this is all about: doing what they can to make the world better in William's honour.
Louis thrives because he holds out hope for the better and shoulders the burden in a balanced fashion rather than letting it consume him. Albert and Moran are consumed by grief and the need they feel to punish themselves for their perceived transgressions in causing William's sure death. It takes them longer to process because they deeply blame themselves for it, whereas Louis does not and equally is given the opportunity to become his own person outside of his grief.
Albert and Moran's ways of processing are not necessarily wrong - they take much longer and cause themselves a lot of harm in their ways of thinking, but they still come out the other side with some support. Louis has a support network as head of MI6, Albert and Moran left theirs behind in their self-imposed punishments. Albert does have one consistent support though - Mycroft, and his letters via Charles Dickens, who shared in his grief of a younger brother - but it is still not quite enough to bring him out of his darkness. Sometimes people need a bit more help, like Moran needing the help of all of MI6 in the end, after he'd been on his own for the whole time skip. William literally says "we (humans) can't survive on our own" and that's true for basically everyone in the series - it's what Louis was talking about when it came to someone 'validating their need to keep on living'.
Yuumori Into the Woods AU idea where Sherlock and Mycroft are the princes, William is Cinderella and Albert is Rapunzel.
Prince Sherlock has always been interested in maidens in perilous situations, or rather just the mysterious nature around their situations. As such, his relationships are fleeting - once the tale is unravelled, and he finds a new more exciting riddle elsewhere with a different maiden shrouded in mystery, he moves on. But at a masquerade ball he meets a different maiden, the only mystery being her true identity (hidden by magic), but his interest is more powerful than ever before. Charmed by witty banter, stimulating battles of deducation and undeniable romantic tension, he seeks out (only a simple clue to lead the way) and finds a poor yet striking young man by the name of William James (surname unknown) behind the facade. But for once, the interest doesn't disappear; in fact it strengthens more than ever before, almost synonymous with that idea of love he'd yet to feel prior. And William, originally sneaking into the ball thanks to his fascination with the life of the aristocracy, equally falls for the man's brilliant mind and beauty.
Meanwhile, his brother Prince Mycroft is expected to ascend the throne soon, and so is occasionally sent as a knight to rescue princesses in peril (hoping he will find a wife in the process). In his mind, he saves them as a duty to the people of the kingdom, and so shutting down any proposals and interest he is shown is the right thing to do. He already has a lot of responsibilities in the kingdom, essentially running a large aspect of it by now despite not having taken the mantle of king. One day, he finds a mysterious tower in the woods, the route to reach it precarious and requiring climbing an incredibly long head of chestnut hair. Inside sits not a young maiden, but a young man (going by the name of Albert Moriarty) who had been locked inside his whole life. This is the first time in his life Prince Mycroft has felt anything romantic toward someone he were to rescue (although he is very taken aback and nervous about it, unsure if he is allowed to act on such feelings), and Albert is immediately taken by his charm - but the process of rescue is not so simple. They communicate through letters, sent by carrier pigeon, plotting a way to free Albert from the chains of the Witch (who has convinced him he has committed terrible sin and the tower is his punishment or something like that, I don't know what character would fill that role).
Their endings are up for change, as it would act more as a resolution to their character flaws compared to Act 2's original approach (the fact they chase what they can't have rather than what they love and are doomed to repeat so for eternity). I could say I would want them to have a happy ending but Into the Woods isn't a story of the conventional type of happily ever after (that subversion is the entire point, I fear). So it has equal opportunity to be tragic or happy.
[I lowkey kind of just needed to get this idea out into the world because otherwise it would sit in some drafts for ages instead.]
So i'm 15k words deep in this concept now. I've basically written 3 full chapters but I don't want to post it yet because chapter 1 needs a lot of editing to make it interesting because it's SOO MUCH CONTEXT but that's just how the prologue song is anyway. But my prose in that chapter needs WORK. Chapters 2 and 3 though (the respective sherliam and alcroft first meetings).. i think they're pretty tea i think they're good. this is the wackiest au concept ever and I'm determined to make it work and see it through. hopefully coming at some point to ao3
edit: on ao3 now. should be linked in an updated version of the og post.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Another time skip NYC daily life Sherliam fic but William stays home whilst Sherlock is on a case and has to keep himself entertained :) plus it's a bit more angsty and feels centric and surprise it sets up a third instalment
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
when writing a sherliam fluff fanfic of them having a day out in nyc (that i want to be decently historically accurate) has so far got me searching the wikipedias for 'gas stove', 'the history of transportation in new york city', 'central park', 'tallest buildings in the world built before the 20th century', 'the american museum of natural history', 'dinosaurs', and 'bacon sandwiches'