look, if youâre going to run a website dedicated to civil rights and liberties (and especially if your website deals with disability issues) âŚ
⌠then you have to make sure your website is accessible for people who use devices like screen readers, adapted keyboards, speech-to-text, etc..
the big one Iâm thinking of here is image captions.
If youâre going to put an image in a post, caption it in plain, screen-reader accessible text.
If thereâs a link to a reader-accessible version or transcript, put it in the body of the post near the image.
but this is also for things like closed captioning.
Of the many YouTube channels I watch, I can think of only two that have regular, high-quality closed captioning (Tom Scott* and @annieelainey**, if anyone is wondering).
The rest are a sort of piecemeal, hit-and-miss fashion.
Including channels like John Oliver and Samantha Bee â these channels feature clips from network comedy news shows! They have network backing; surely they can assign someone to make sure the YouTube videos have closed captions.
Gah, and understanding that not everyone is able to use a mouse and hardware keyboard at all times.
Some people use tablets (think iPad) because of a disability. Some use a drawing tablet and pen (think what Wacom makes) because those are easier. Some people use voice-controlled mouse and speech-to-text software.
(Kristen Cashore, author of the Graceling trilogy, has written before about how she writes all her novels with pen and paper and then uses speech-to-text software to transcribe them into a computer.)
Some people can only use a keyboard, no mouse or tablet or pen at all.
my point is here that if you want to strive for progress and make that clear in your website, you must make it accessible to disabled people who use adaptive computers.
Do not leave us out of your activism because we canât access your sites. Many of us already canât be involved in activism offline because of our disabilities.
Donât make the internet even more hostile to us. Please.
(I realize that I am leaving a lot of adaptive systems out of this post. If you have more examples of ways people can make websites accessible, please add them.)
*Tom Scott makes videos about science, interesting âThings You Might Not Know,â travelogues, and general British buffoonery.
**Annie Elainey is a disability activist who makes videos about her experiences with disability, race, gender, sexuality, and a number of other issues.
I feel like @annieelainey (obviously), @becauseoftheshame, @thequantumqueer, @wetwareproblem, @petitetimidgay and anyone else who wants to add something might have good points to add to this post. Go ahead!
(tagging @annieelainey because donnieâs tag didnât work)
I donât have much to add because the internet is generally pretty accessible to me, but here are a few:
organize your website in a single-column layout. screen readers like that and tend to get pissy about other layouts.
give warnings about things that flash. seizures are Not Fun⢠and unexpected seizures are Even Less Funâ˘.
avoid all of these with basically no exceptions:
tiny text
low-contrast colors
any font your high school english teacher would yell about
autoplay of any kind
if someone tells you that something about your site makes it hard for them to use, they are right
do not argue with them, even if the change they suggest isnât a viable option at the moment.
yes, even in that hypothetical situation you just thought of
boosting this to @eritated, @hopeandhandler, @spoonie-on-wheels, @cherrydragon, @sissikuk, and @longflighttimetofight





















