Solile

(unless they're historical figures and I can use appropriate retrospect),

but I think Terry Pratchett would have hated Good Omens seasons 2 and 3.

Good Omens (the book and season 1) was VERY Terry Pratchett. The mystery of it, the humour, the references, and the nature of Aziraphale and Crowleys relationship with eachother AND with humanity. Humanity is arguably the main character of the book, with Crowley and Aziraphale popping in and out, and doing almost nothing to contribute to the end of Armageddon. It was perfect, it was funny. That book was his BABY. He had the big idea, and all the world building. He wrote (according to him) about 70% of that book.

Season 2 and 3 completely lack his presence. It's all very Neil Gaiman. The entire plot is focused so intently on Aziraphale and Crowley, with Nina and Maggies characters basically only existing to mirror them. Humanity was not centered at all. All of the mystery was stripped, and the silliness is far less.

Apparently, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman discussed the possibility of a sequel from time to time, but I doubt Pratchett would have actually followed through with it, since they never actually started it and he's not been big on sequels. He would reference previous Discworld books in later ones, but every story always started from near scratch, never a true sequel. Additionally, Pratchett asked for all him drafts and work-in-progresses to be destroyed after his death. It seems like he didn't really want people to keep his stories going without him.